{"id":6091,"date":"2015-06-23T16:35:36","date_gmt":"2015-06-23T15:35:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/?p=6091"},"modified":"2015-06-23T16:35:36","modified_gmt":"2015-06-23T15:35:36","slug":"blogroll-patently-inventive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/2015\/06\/blogroll-patently-inventive.html","title":{"rendered":"Blogroll: Patently inventive"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Editor&#8217;s note: As we continue to invite bloggers out there in the wild to compose our monthly Blogroll column, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/lgamon\" target=\"_blank\">Luke Gamon<\/a> penned the July 2015 column.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p><strong>Toxicology, the odds of discovering a drug and creativity in design.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Spurred on by <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/lisamjarvis\/status\/591358247585452032\" target=\"_blank\">a tweet from C&amp;EN&#8217;s Lisa Jarvis<\/a>, an active discussion has developed on Twitter and in the blogosphere about the odds of a chemist discovering a drug over an entire career. Some <a href=\"https:\/\/pipeline.corante.com\/archives\/2015\/04\/24\/what_are_the_odds_of_finding_a_drug_and_how_do_you_stand_them.php\" target=\"_blank\">number crunching by Derek Lowe<\/a>, writing at In The Pipeline, produced a figure around 1%. Ash Jogalekar at The Curious Wavefunction <a href=\"https:\/\/wavefunction.fieldofscience.com\/2015\/04\/what-is-probability-of-chemist.html\" target=\"_blank\">argues that the question is more complicated<\/a> and wonders whether \u201cthe patent system has become biased toward chemists\u201d. In the protracted, multidisciplinary development of a drug, who is truly responsible for its invention?<\/p>\n<p>Over at The Dose Makes the Poison, <a href=\"https:\/\/dosemakespoison.blogspot.com.au\/2015\/04\/the-beat-goes-on-with-synthetic.html\" target=\"_blank\">ForensicToxGuy writes of the more illicit innovations in synthetic cannabinoids<\/a> and what can be considered to be the &#8216;wild west&#8217; of drug design. The creativity of these outlaw medicinal chemists in developing chemical diversity never ceases to amaze and is creating a \u201cpublic health nightmare\u201d of substances with unknown pharmacological and toxicological effects. Meanwhile, writing at amphoteros, <a href=\"https:\/\/amphoteros.com\/2015\/05\/15\/filling-the-groove-of-bcl-2\/\" target=\"_blank\">Andrei Yudin talks of chemical aesthetics<\/a> and the merit of elongated molecules in drug design, however ugly they may be.<\/p>\n<p>While the chemical sciences continue to innovate, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.labsolutely.org\/2015\/04\/25\/parafilm-galore\/\" target=\"_blank\">Vittorio Saggiomo delves into the history of Parafilm<\/a> \u2014 another ugly, yet incredibly handy invention \u2014 on his blog Labsolutely. Many would shudder to think of a laboratory without that greasy, stretchy film. Finally, the ever-present Kristof Heged\u00fcs at Pictures from an Organic Chemistry Laboratory <a href=\"https:\/\/labphoto.tumblr.com\/post\/119214028699\/the-best-example-that-why-do-chemists-wear-lab\" target=\"_blank\">tells a cautionary tale of a nitration gone wrong<\/a> and the importance of a good lab coat. Even the most commonplace of innovations may well be the most vital.<\/p>\n<p><em>Written by Luke Gamon, who blogs at <a href=\"https:\/\/lukegamon.wordpress.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/lukegamon.wordpress.com\/<\/a> and tweets as <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/lgamon\" target=\"_blank\">@lgamon<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p><em>[As mentioned in <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/2010\/12\/blogroll_the_column.html\" target=\"_blank\">this post<\/a>, we\u2019re posting the monthly blogroll column here on the Sceptical Chymist. This is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/nchem\/journal\/v7\/n7\/full\/nchem.2292.html\" target=\"_blank\">the July 2015 article<\/a>]<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Editor\u2019s note: As we continue to invite bloggers out there in the wild to compose our monthly Blogroll column, Luke Gamon penned the July 2015 column.&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/2015\/06\/blogroll-patently-inventive.html#more-6091\" class=\"more-link\">Read more<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/2015\/06\/blogroll-patently-inventive.html\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":541,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6091","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogs-we-like"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6091","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/541"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6091"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6091\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6091"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6091"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/thescepticalchymist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6091"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}