[As mentioned in this post, we’re posting the monthly blogroll column here on the Sceptical Chymist. This is a slightly longer version of March’s article.]
What responsibilities are borne by the creators of compounds that end up as ‘legal highs’?
Nature kicked off the International Year of Chemistry in style, with its first issue of the year containing lots of features, comment and papers on the central science. In its pages was a ‘World View’ column from David Nichols, in which he “describes how his research on psychedelic compounds has been abused — with fatal consequences.” Nichols refers to the makers of ‘legal highs’, who use his work on psychedelic drugs for treating disease in rather less academic ways. Perhaps surprisingly for a one-page opinion article, this got quite a lot of attention — even reaching the BBC website. It certainly reached Derek Lowe who blogged about it in strong terms at In the Pipeline. Lowe expressed his “disgust for the people who are making and selling these things – they show a horrifying and stupid disregard for human life”, and his sympathy for Nichols.
These sentiments were echoed by David Kroll on Terra Sigillata. In a lengthy post Kroll discussed Nichol’s work, the social responsibilities of scientists and even personal freedoms. He summed up by voicing his admiration and “respect Dr. Nichols for coming out and discussing his personal feelings about how his science is used”.
But the chemistry blogosphere was not entirely in agreement. Andrea Sella used his Solarsaddle blog to ask “Is David Nichols just a wee bit disingenuous?”. Sella had been on a BBC radio programme discussing Nichols’s article and was surprised to discover Nichols’s close links to Alexander Shulgin, author of PiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story. He even goes so far as to say that Nichols’s “opinion piece strikes me as a kind of lame attempt to deflect criticism of his work”. Kroll responded in a second post acknowledging that Nichols did admit that “part of the reason” behind the article was to “distance himself from the psychedelic community”.
And finally…KJHaxton launched a new series of posts on Endless Possibilities titled ‘What Am I?’. Haxton gives some chemical clues to the ingredients of a household product and leaves the reader to deduce its identity.
Stu’s suggested that I round out the “blogroll on the blog” feature by letting you know what just missed the cut, so here goes:
If James Cameron did chemistry from I Can Has Science
You Can Take the Chemist Out of the Lab but… [why do onions make you cry? And also interesting for the lab habits you use in the kitchen] from the Chemistry Blog
More Nature IYC-provoked stuff with ChemBark on Whitesides+Deutch
“Never work for a company as a chemist if chemistry is not their main activity.” The take-home advice of this post from Lamentations on Chemistry
Ayusman Sen on public appreciation of scientists vs entrepeneurs (eg Gates/Jobs/Zucker)
WARNING! VERY BAD LANGUAGE!*
And f*ing finally, the sweary science pictures guy (ZOMG Science)