James Cameron makes deep donation to oceanographers

A visualization of the Mariana Trench with an exaggerated vertical scale. credit: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

A visualization of the Mariana Trench with an exaggerated vertical scale.
{credit}NOAA{/credit}

After setting a record for the deepest single-person dive, filmmaker James Cameron stored his submersible in his garage and moved onto other projects — namely sequels to his hit 2009 movie Avatar. Now he’s pulling the craft, the DEEPSEA CHALLENGER (DSC), out of storage. On the anniversary of Cameron’s trip to the bottom of the Mariana Trench, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts announced that it is forming a partnership with Cameron and that he is donating his submersible and associated technology to the research centre.

The submersible, which reached a depth of 10,900 metres, is the only one capable of ferrying a human to the lower third of the ocean’s full range. The next deepest-diving submersible, China’s Jiaolong, just passed the 7,000-metre mark during dives last year.

“The DSC’s unique capabilities are highly valued,” says engineer Andy Bowen, director of the National Deep Submergence Facility at Woods Hole. “Having spent some time looking at the submersible, it’s impossible to come away unimpressed by the quality of the engineering and technical achievement embodied in the submersible itself and the various subsystems.”

Researchers at Woods Hole plan to start using some components of the DSC almost immediately. Chris German, a marine geochemist, hopes to use the camera systems from the submersible during dives with a remote-controlled vehicle this summer into the Cayman Trough. Although the vehicle, called Nereus, has its own cameras and lighting systems, the ones from the DSC are thought to be superior.

Scientists seeking to conduct dives with the DSC itself will need to raise the necessary funds to support a field programme, says Bowen. And the vehicle has not yet passed the kinds of certification tests typically required of research submersibles. “One of the early steps we’ll be undertaking is to look at what needs to be done to bring it into compliance with certification,” he says. But Bowen did not hesitate when asked whether he would take the DSC on a trip more than 10 kilometres down. “It’s an extremely well-designed submersible and there’s been a tremendous attention to safety.”

This will be a big year for deep-diving activities at Woods Hole. The centre is finishing up a US$40-million rebuild of the Alvin submersible, a three-person craft capable of diving to 4,500 metres. Alvin has been the workhorse of US oceanography for the past 5 decades, but it has been out of commission since 2010. The refurbished submersible will undergo field trials in late spring, says Bowen.

Steven Chu to step down from energy post

Steven Chu{credit}DOE{/credit}

Steven Chu announced today that he will soon step down as head of the US energy department, a move that had been widely anticipated. Nature this week previewed some of the potential replacements for Chu and other members of US President Barack Obama’s environmental team.

In his letter to energy department employees, Chu highlighted a string of accomplishments, including starting the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), founding Energy Innovation Hubs for applied research and overseeing a doubling in the country’s production of solar and wind energy.

Nature recognized Chu as its newsmaker of the year in 2009 for his role in revamping America’s energy research and power systems. He played an important part in helping to stem the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, but he also faced strong criticism from foes in Congress, particularly over a US$535-million loan guarantee that his department made to the solar-cell manufacturing firm, Solyndra, which entered bankruptcy in 2011.

In his letter today, Chu told employees that he and his wife will return to California and he would like to resume teaching and research.

Arctic Report Card: Dark Times Ahead

Decreasing snow amounts may be pushing Arctic fox populations in Europe toward extinction{credit}NOAA{/credit}

Conditions in the Arctic are slipping rapidly from bad to worse as the pace of climate change accelerates in that region. That’s the message from an annual environmental assessment of the far North, released on Wednesday.

“Conditions in the Arctic are changing in both expected and sometimes surprising ways,” said Jane Lubchenco, head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The changes are having an impact far beyond the far North, she added. “What happens in the Arctic doesn’t always stay in the Arctic. We’re seeing Arctic changes that affect weather patterns in the US,” Lubchenco said at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco, where the Arctic Report Card was previewed. The online report was written by 114 scientists from 15 countries.

According to the report, the Arctic broke a string of environmental records this past year. The summertime sea ice pack was the smallest ever seen. The amount of Northern Hemisphere snow in June hit the lowest mark on record. Virtually the entire Greenland Ice Cap showed some evidence of surface melting for the first time in observations going back to 1979. And permafrost temperatures on the North Slope of Alaska topped previous highs, said Martin O. Jeffries, a co-editor of the Arctic report and the Arctic science advisor at the Office of Naval Research. “If we’re not there already, we’re surely on the verge of seeing a new Arctic,” he said.

The widespread reduction in snow and ice cover in summertime has darkened the ocean surface and land in the Arctic, allowing it to absorb more sunlight, which leads to enhanced warming. “The Arctic is one of Earth’s mirrors and that mirror is breaking,” said Donald Perovich, an Arctic researcher at Dartmouth College, who participated in the report.

The darkening of the surface creates a positive feedback that explains why the Arctic is warming twice as quickly as lower latitudes, said Jeffries. “This is what we call the Arctic amplification of global warming, a phenomenon that was predicted 30 years ago, which we’re now seeing happening in a significant way.”

The changes are putting stress on some creatures, including Arctic foxes in Scandinavia and nearby regions. The European population has crashed in recent years; and with only 200 individuals left, it is in danger of extinction, according to the report, which blames disruptions in the population of rodents. Lemming numbers have dropped in some regions, and scientists have suggested that reduced snow cover may be implicated, said Jeffries.

The Arctic assessment comes out a week after a report that documented accelerated melting of ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica.

James Cameron releases results from his deep dive

A 3-D rendering of the trench exaggerates the vertical scale to show topographic features{credit}National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration{/credit}

While the public has been waiting for film director James Cameron to produce a sequel to his blockbuster Avatar, oceanographers have been wondering when he would release the science results of his dive to the bottom of the ocean last March. On Tuesday, Cameron and his team doled out a few tidbits to a packed audience at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco.

“We did end up with some amazing science results from this project,” says Cameron.

On 26 March, he piloted his newly finished submersible, the Deepsea Challenger, to the floor of the Mariana Trench and became the first human since 1960 to reach the lowest spot in the ocean—at a depth of 10,900 metres. In trials before that, he set the record for currently operating submersibles by diving down to 8,200 metres to the bottom of the New Britain Trench, which had never been explored by humans or by remotely operated vehicles in the past. “It was basically terra incognita from a science perspective,” says Cameron.

In terms of biology, the New Britain Trench looked like New York City compared to the desert at the bottom of the Mariana Trench. On dives with the submersible and with robotic vehicles, the team found thriving communities of acorn worms and sea anemones at the bottom of the New Britain trench, which were fed by nutrients coming from nearby islands. “There was a lot of nutrient input,” says Douglas Bartlett, a microbiologist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, California. “It was incredible to see logs at 8.2 kilometres.”

Cameron had hoped to do more dives in the Mariana trench but ran out of time, in part because of a helicopter accident that killed two crew members earlier in the expedition, he says. Aside from Cameron’s single trip to the bottom, the submersible went down in an unmanned check-out dive and the robotic vehicles visited two spots on the seafloor in the trench. One of those sites was in a basin called the Serena Deep.

“What was very exciting about the Serena Deep dive was we could see outcrops and bizarre microbial mats covering the rocks,” says Kevin Hand, an astrobiologist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. The researchers suspect that the outcrops contain rocks from the mantle that are being altered by a process called serpentinization, in which sea water reacts with minerals and releases hydrogen and methane. Those could provide the energy to feed the microbial communities seen at the site, says Hand.

The findings have implications for the origins of life on Earth and other planets, he says. Researchers have speculated that the process of serpentinization in the early oceans could have supplied the energy and raw materials critical for a primordial metabolism, which could eventually have given rise to the first cells. “Serpentenization is seen to be a possible culprit in that step between geochemisty and biochemistry,” says Hand.

Cameron doesn’t have concrete plans to take his sub for a spin anytime soon, but he says he hopes to gain funding for future missions and will make the technology available to the scientific community. In the meantime, he may get involved in a Mars mission.

Cameron helped develop a stereo zoom camera system for the Mars Curiosity rover, but NASA took those advanced cameras off the craft shortly before launch and replaced them with simpler imagers. NASA announced on Tuesday that it will send a mission to Mars in 2020 using some of the technology developed for Curiosity. Hearing that at the meeting, Cameron said, “I’ll immediately go and start banging the drum to get the zoom version flown.”

 

Armstrong left mark on science

Neil Armstrong after his first moon walk{credit}NASA{/credit}

The death of Neil Armstrong over the weekend triggered a wave of commemorations, from Barack Obama and Mitt Romney to countless tweeters who said they were inspired by the first man to walk on the moon. Armstrong and his fellow Apollo astronauts also made a big impact on science — by helping to steer a generation of young students toward scientific research. That was one of the conclusions to come out of a survey that Nature conducted in the summer of 2009, on the 40th anniversary of the Apollo 11 lunar landing. Nature asked 800 scientists who had published in the journal about the legacy of the Apollo program. Half of the researchers who responded said that the Apollo missions had inspired them to become scientists.

Our story on the Apollo survey notes that the moon landings influenced future researchers in many fields, not just those in astronomy. “I became completely space crazy,” one life scientist told Nature at the time. “I was certain I’d be an astronaut. My interest shifted to biology, but I still believe Apollo 11 was a major influence on me.” Most researchers also felt that there were strong scientific reasons for continuing to support human space flight.

Nature’s Apollo special has a rich assortment of articles, interviews, and commentaries. There’s also a great slideshow of Apollo images.

Court dismisses suit over unethical US experiments

Guatemalan subjects of US medical experiments

A US court has dismissed a lawsuit by Guatemalan citizens against US officials in connection with unethical medical experiments conducted by American researchers in the 1940s. Lawyers representing the plaintiffs vowed to appeal the 14 June decision.

The semi-secret research project, which Nature reported on in “Human experiments: First, do harm”, involved a group of US medical researchers who established a lab in Guatemala to study treatments for syphilis, gonorrhoea and other diseases. They experimented on more than 5,000 Guatemalans — including military personnel, residents of mental hospitals and prisoners — without their consent and exposed at least 1,300 to sexually transmitted diseases. After details of the experiments emerged in 2010, President Barack Obama apologized to Guatemala and launched an investigation by the presidential bioethics commission, which issued a series of reports condemning the experiments.

In the court case, Guatemalans who contend that they were victims of the medical experiments (or their legal heirs) sued eight US federal officials. On Wednesday, Judge Reggie B. Walton ruled in favour of the US government, which argued that it was immune in this case. In his decision, Walton said, “This court is powerless to provide any redress to the plaintiffs. Their pleas are more appropriately directed to the political branches of our government, who, if they choose, have the ability to grant some modicum of relief to those affected by the Guatemalan study.”

Terrence Collingsworth, a lawyer representing the Guatemalan plaintiffs, said in a statement: “We are disappointed by the decision and strongly disagree that these doctrines of immunity apply under the extreme circumstances of this case. We plan to appeal and will continue to seek justice for the victims of these atrocious human rights violations committed by the US Government.”