Farm to Genomes: African Rice

Meyer at al., Nature Genetics, 2016

Meyer at al., Nature Genetics, 2016

Rice is one of the most important crops on the planet, responsible for feeding billions of people. Given this global significance, studying rice in different geographies can be useful and aid in harnessing genetic diversity underlying particular traits and adaptations favorable to different environments. African rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud.) is mainly grown in sub-Saharan Africa and known for its stress tolerance. In a new article this week in Nature Genetics, Michael Purugganan and colleagues report the whole genome re-sequencing of 93 African rice landraces from various regions of Western coastal and sub-Saharan Africa. They create a genome-wide SNP map and through comparative genomic analysis study the domestication and population history of African rice. They use their map to perform GWAS for salt tolerance and find 11 significantly associated regions, highlighting the value of this unique genetic resource.

Meyer et al., Nature Genetics, 2016

Meyer et al., Nature Genetics, 2016

By studying various regions with distinct environments, the authors were able to get clues about adaptation and geographic spread of the populations. They focused on coastal Senegal and inland Togo, which have higher and lower levels of soil salinity, respectively, and interviewed farmers in the region to understand the agricultural practices they employ in each region. The knowledge of the farmers helped to inform the genetic analysis and contributed to the model of African rice domestication and dispersal.

You can watch some of the interviews with the farmers here:

African rice farmers- interviews

Additionally, we spoke with authors Michael Purugganan and Rachel Meyer to get some background on this research.

Why do you think that rice is understudied in Africa compared to other places?

MP: I think it’s because it is not widely grown, unlike its Asian counterpart which has pretty much taken over the world.  But there definitely is more interest in African rice as breeders are trying to figure out how to increase food production in Africa, as well as to try to see what genes in African rice can be used to improve Asian rice.

RM: There is a lot of great research on improving Asian rice for African farmers that is being done by brilliant AfricaRice scientists, and they are working hard on the social science side too. But there are so many challenges that Africa disproportionately faces – particularly climate variation – that demands ramping up rice research. There is insufficient support for programs that integrate crop experiments and trials into the different farmlands. A better connection between scientists and small-scale farmers would really help farmers adopt new varieties too- because there is sometimes resistance to trying new ones.

How did you choose which samples to include in your analysis?

RM: Recognizing that a lot of NGO work encouraging farmers to grow Asian rice ramped up in the 80’s and 90’s, we took advantage of the germplasm largely donated in the 70’s to the West Africa Rice Development Association, which were duplicated and available through IRRI (International Rice Research Institute). We chose accessions with the most metadata available, preferring ones with georeferenced location and a cultivar name. It wasn’t until later that we realized water tables far inland were high in salinity, so we just tried to make sure we had a fair number of samples within 250km of the coast, or along rivers connecting to the ocean.

Were you surprised by any of your findings?

MP: There definitely were a few surprises in the data, but the big revelation for me was the long time for the population bottleneck that led to domestication.  We found from the genomic data that it may have taken more than 10,000 years of steady population decline before full-blown domesticated African rice shows up in the archaeological record.  This suggests the possibility that humans were already cultivating or managing its ancestor for thousands of years, and I think if this pattern holds for other domesticated crop species it will change our thinking on how domestication has taken place.

RM: I was surprised we got nice GWAS results with so few samples, and even more surprised that we saw several of those exhibiting signatures of geographic selection. We were lucky to find a broad distribution of traits in the landraces we chose to sequence, for we had made the DNA libraries ahead of the phenotyping experiments.

What was it like to meet and talk with the farmers?

RM: It was one of the highlights of my life to meet the farmers! I’m grateful to have gotten a glimpse of their heritage, their pride, and their struggles. We were all so impressed with the generosity of women, in particular, to help each other. We were also shocked by how many farms are run by the elderly; their children don’t see farming as profitable and many have left. For the three of us in the field, it made us think hard about how we can give back to the communities that gave us their time. I hope that crop science, publicity (like this blog) and policy changes can raise the profile of the small-scale farmer.

In each interview, the farmers also had a chance to interview us, and that part was especially interesting. Several asked really good questions about African and Asian rice domestication. You could see the cultural value of the basic science.

You chose to focus on salinity tolerance as a trait particularly relevant to farming in Africa.  In what ways do you see your results being used for crop improvement?

RM: One of the authors, from AfricaRice, Dr. Kofi Bimpong, had actually been working on salt tolerance separately as well, and has two graduate student collecting African rice landraces in Casamance. If from this paper we can consider that domestication possibly occurred in the Inner Niger Delta region and also in the West, then these collecting efforts are all the more important because they are from a center of origin, promising more genetic variation than people would have ever estimated. If you look through the available germplasm there is so little that has been collected or studied from Casamance. It’s tricky collecting there, for there is social unrest, and landmines. Hats off to the young graduate students, Mamadou Sock and Bathe Diop, doing that fieldwork; I’m sure there is a lot of discovery to be made with those collections, and more promising salt tolerant landraces to integrate into breeding programs.

In addition, our results suggesting many of the salt tolerance genes are shared in both rice species make them more valuable to explore in other crops.  Shared adaptive mechanisms are especially fascinating to evolutionary biologists and are powerful assets of the breeder’s toolbox.

Preliminary look at GWAS articles including dbGaP accessions

{credit}NCBI {/credit}

In this month’s Editorial (doi:10.1038/ng.3088) we mention 66 articles in this journal published between 2008 and 2013 that cite dbGaP accession codes and we took a preliminary look at citation of 13 pairs of GWAS articles with and without a dbGaP accession published on the same trait on the same day in the same journal (in the case of more than two simultaneous articles, non-overlapping pairs were assigned by sequential DOI number). Here are the references and some of the citation information for readers who want to investigate this area further.

Simultaneously published articles with citation data:

Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 4.33.49 PM

citationdataAll Nature Genetics articles with dbGaP accession:

DOI Scopus citations up to 8/1/14
10.1038/ng.249 212
10.1038/ng.364 184
10.1038/ng.362 174
10.1038/ng.416 128
10.1038/ng.311 468
10.1038/ng.269 396
10.1038/ng.291 583
10.1038/ng.290 305
10.1038/ng.386 111
10.1038/ng.384 464
10.1038/ng.381 534
10.1038/ng.377 169
10.1038/ng.456 86
10.1038/ng.466 137
10.1038/ng.474 270
10.1038/ng.432 141
10.1038/ng.716 87
10.1038/ng.714 131
10.1038/ng.520 628
10.1038/ng.523 86
10.1038/ng.521 211
10.1038/ng.517 134
10.1038/ng.501 191
10.1038/ng.493 75
10.1038/ng.602 46
10.1038/ng.604 68
10.1038/ng.537 148
10.1038/ng.568 198
10.1038/ng.567 80
10.1038/ng.571 281
10.1038/ng.573 223
10.1038/ng.686 761
10.1038/ng.666 91
10.1038/ng.642 197
10.1038/ng.1017 52
10.1038/ng.1013 56
10.1038/ng01113 13
10.1038/ng.859 85
10.1038/ng.803 374
10.1038/ng.801 387
10.1038/ng.970 69
10.1038/ng.922 75
10.1038/ng.934 31
10.1038/ng.941 77
10.1038/ng.223 43
10.1038/ng.2250 103
10.1038/ng.2466 18
10.1038/ng.1108 124
10.1038/ng.1051 45
10.1038/ng.2354 95
10.1038/ng.2344 35
10.1038/ng.2213 60
10.1038/ng.2274 71
10.1038/ng.2285 22
10.1038/ng.2272 40
10.1038/ng.2368 23
10.1038/ng.2360 30
10.1038/ng.2385 63
10.1038/ng.2564 42
10.1038/ng.2505 23
10.1038/ng.2529 51
10.1038/ng.2554 38
10.1038/ng.2792 17
10.1038/ng.2794 6
10.1038/ng.2764 42
10.1038/ng.2702 36

Love for Nature Genetics

In a previous blog post, I asked “what makes a Nature Genetics paper?” I have been slow to follow up on the post with my own answers to that question, but in the meantime I would like to share this email that brightened my day (edited for clarity): 

“I work on the field of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in complex diseases and I note that of recent months, the criteria and standard of Nature Genetics (NG) for accepting GWAS papers is getting higher and higher.

 Looking back at this editorial from 3 years back:  https://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v43/n7/full/ng.881.html

Vol43_7

Cover art from Vol 43, Issue 7 {credit}John Arabolos{/credit}

It appears that NG remains truly interested in strong, novel biological insights arising from the genetic work, and this is really wonderful. Consistent with this, NG published a beautiful and conclusive GWAS on visceral leishmaniasis in 2013, even though very small studies in the past have hinted at the same gene, but without any power to be at all definitive. I could go on and on, as there are many such great examples.

Despite a ton of [rejections without review], my collective experience with the journal has been very good due to the consistency of the editorial decisions handed down, and the very helpful tone of the editors. It may seem subtle and not all that obvious, but I note that ‘secondary, strongly genome-wide significant, ethnic specific signals’ within a broadly known locus is usually not of sufficient novelty for NG, and it is really consistent throughout. The journal is to be saluted for the consistent, increase in standards throughout the years.”

We of course try to be as consistent as possible in our editorial decisions and to constantly raise the bar…though this doesn’t always make everyone happy, for sure. We’d love to hear from more of you (whether positive or negative feedback…though please keep it civil!). You can email me or directly leave a note in the comments if you prefer.