Caltech president to leave post and head to Saudi University

California Institute of Technology president Jean-Lou Chameau has announced that he will step down.{credit}Caltech{/credit}

Jean-Lou Chameau is leaving his post as president of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena at an unspecified date later this year to head the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) in Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.

KAUST confirmed the move of the French-born engineer in a statement on 19 February. Chameau has served as president of Caltech since September of 2006 and has sought to promote multidisciplinary research and education on campus. His wife, Carol Carmichael, worked as a faculty associate in the engineering department. In a statement, Chameau said the move came as something as a surprise.

“Until recently, Carol and I believed we would complete our careers at Caltech and retire in Pasadena,” he said in a statement. “We did not expect, however, to be presented with a unique and life-changing opportunity: to lead the recently created King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).”

Chameau has helped to raise nearly US$1 billion in funding for Caltech since arriving that the university. His appointment to KAUST will likely give a major boost to efforts there to make it into a world-class institution. He replaces Choon Fong Shih, a mechanical engineer who has overseen the university since it opened its doors in 2009.

More details of Russian meteor emerge

{credit} Butsenko Anton/ITAR-TASS Photo/Corbis{/credit}

Over the weekend, scientists learned more about the meteor that struck the Chelyabinsk region of Russia on 15 February. Ria Novosti is reporting that scientists from Urals State University in Ekaterinburg have made an expedition to Lake Chebarkul, where meteor fragments reportedly fell.

On the basis of 53 samples between 0.5–1 centimetre in diameter, the researchers determined that the meteor was an ordinary chondrite containing olivine, sulfite and about 10% iron. The material is consistent with a stony meteoroid from the asteroid belt.

While Russian researchers get their hands on the tiny meteorites that remain, other researchers have been sifting through the data picked up by a network of infrasound stations that are designed to listen for atomic weapons tests. As many as 17 stations, including one as far way as Antarctica, have picked up the reverberation of the meteor in the atmosphere. The Comprehensive Nuclear-test-ban Treaty Organization, which runs the network, is now calling the explosion the largest ever seen by their system.

NASA has fresh figures on the meteor, based on infrasound data. According to an updated release from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, the meteor was 17 metres across and weighed 10,000 tonnes. The explosive energy was nearly 500 kilotonnes.

In response to the accident, scientists in both the United States and Russia have called for programmes to intercept and destroy meteoroids and debris. Such concepts are likely to be costly.

Incoming! Russia feels meteor blast

https://youtu.be/duD0b1UMAnA

This morning, residents of the Chelyabinsk region of Russia saw an enormous meteor streak across the sky. Cars’ dashboard cameras captured one or more objects falling to Earth.

The strike is reported to have occurred around 03:25 UTC this morning, according to the Planetary Society, just before sunrise locally. Other videos record the shock wave from the meteor — probably either a sonic boom as it entered the atmosphere and/or the sound of it breaking up:

https://youtu.be/b0cRHsApzt8

There are reports of hundreds injured by broken glass across the region, and additional videos show apparent damage to some buildings.

It’s not entirely clear what’s caused the damage. The shock-wave video shows that it was a powerful burst that could have probably shattered windows on its own, but the New York Times reports that an impact crater has been found on the outskirts of a town 50 miles west of Chelyabinsk city. Meteorites are also reported to have rained down around the city of Satka, but these reports are unconfirmed.

The strike comes as an asteroid known as 2012 DA14 is about to pass Earth in a geosynchronous orbit, but initial reports make it sound as though the meteor or meteors are unrelated. Astronomer Phil Plait says that the trajectories simply don’t seem to add up — this meteor came from a different direction. The European Space Agency’s Space Operations Centre in Darmstadt, Germany, has tweeted that they believe the meteorite is unrelated. They’ve also posted a photo, taken by Meteosat-10, of the meteor’s vapour trail.

 

North Korea tests “smaller and lighter” bomb

{credit}USGS{/credit}

This morning North Korea announced that it had conducted a third underground nuclear weapons test. The test was detected by US Geologic Survey (USGS) seismic-monitoring stations and those of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization in Vienna, which reported “explosion-like characteristics”. The yield of the test is believed to be roughly 3–10 kilotonnes, according to James Acton, a physicist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington DC.

In a statement from the Korean Central News Agency, North Korea claimed that the test was of a “smaller and lighter A-bomb”. The bomb performed as expected, “demonstrating the good performance of [the country’s] nuclear deterrence that has become diversified”, according to the statement.

North Korea did similar tests in 2006 and 2009, but this one seems to have been more successful than either of the previous attempts. The 2006 test was widely believed to be a “fissile” ‘fizzle’, in which the nuclear material failed to ignite completely, and the 2009 test appeared to be at least partially successful. The USGS put the magnitude of the seismic event associated with the latest explosion at 5.1, several times as powerful as the 2009 test.

A crucial question is what kind of bomb was tested. To date, North Korea has worked only with plutonium, but some believe that the country might be close to testing a uranium weapon. Other arms-control analysts have speculated that the bomb might contain a fusion component to boost its power.

The test comes just two months after North Korea successfully launched its first satellite into orbit.

External review reaffirms hurdles for nuclear-fusion superlaser

A technician at the National Ignition Facility inspects the laser's target {credit}LLNL/NIF{/credit}

Last autumn, the world’s most powerful laser missed a major milestone in its drive to produce thermonuclear fusion. Now, the findings of an independent peer-review panel lay out in detail why achieving that goal is turning out to be so difficult.

The US$3.5-billion National Ignition Facility (NIF), at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, California, is designed to crush tiny pellets of hydrogen isotopes until they fuse into helium. The goal is to release more energy than goes into the pellet and, in doing so, to roughly mimic conditions inside a modern nuclear warhead.

That was the goal, but a six-year “ignition campaign” came up short in September, sparking introspection among scientists, federal officials and congressional funders. Introspection in Washington inevitably leads to reports, and in November and December, a series of reviews of the project were released — including plans to shift the giant laser facility away from ignition work and towards weapons.

Now, a peer review of the project has been made public by the US National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the government body that oversees the NIF. That review, by independent scientists, is the last in a series convened by Steven Koonin, former undersecretary of science at the US Department of Energy.

The new review doesn’t differ too much from previous ones, but it does provide a pithy summary of some of the problems. In particular, it notes that scientists at the NIF have had trouble controlling the symmetry of their laser-driven implosion, and the ways in which hot and cold fuels mix together. The committee also noted that computer codes just aren’t good enough.

Perhaps more interestingly, the committee seemed to be split over whether ignition would actually ever be achievable. “Some reviewers were optimistic while others remain highly skeptical as regards for the prospects of future ignition,” the report says.

Archaeologists unearth Richard III

{credit}University of Leicester{/credit}

This morning, archaeologists at the University of Leicester, UK, announced that a body uncovered last September in a car park was in fact that of the famous king Richard III. The team revealed its find at a morning press conference, along with new photos of the body, which was found on the site of a long-buried medieval church.

The team supplied a bevy of evidence in support of its claim. The most visible sign was scoliosis of the spine, a deformity immortalized in Shakespeare’s unflattering portrait of the king. But researchers cited other pieces of evidence including the location of the burial, the fact that the body had apparently suffered numerous wounds, carbon dating and mitochondrial DNA.

The announcement is generating a lot of press coverage, but it’s sparked a twitter of discontent among scientists who are wondering why the university publicized the discovery before putting the data out for peer review:

ITER gets a home

Tokamak complex

{credit}Engage{/credit}

The experimental ITER reactor is supposed to show how to do nuclear fusion here on Earth. So far, however, it has been used by many scientists as an example of how not to do a major scientific project. The roughly €15-billion (US$19.9-billion) project has been parcelled into contracts, which in turn have been divided among ITER’s seven members: the European Union (EU), Russia, Japan, South Korea, India, China and the United States. As we reported in autumn, this piecemeal strategy is threatening to delay ITER’s already delayed start date by years while the central organization and member states parcel out designs and contracts.

But there was good news for the fusion project yesterday. The EU has signed a major contract for the building to house ITER. Fusion for Energy, the European body charged with the EU portion of the project, announced the contract with a consortium of French and Spanish companies on 15 January. The €300-million building is expected to be completed in mid-2018. For now, ITER is scheduled to begin its first tentative experiments towards fusion in November 2020.

North Korea reaches space

{credit}KCNA{/credit}

This morning, North Korea announced that it had successfully launched an Unha-3 rocket carrying a small satellite into orbit. Claims of success are nothing new for the regime, but this time, NORAD (the US-Canadian defence radar network) confirmed that the nation had succeeded in placing a small object into orbit.

The launch is the fourth attempt since 1998 by the North Koreans to place a satellite into orbit. The latest tracking data show it in roughly the right place, along with two other small objects. An amateur astronomer in Australia seems to have caught the first faint image of the satellite streaking across the sky.

The United States is describing the act as “highly provocative“, and Japan has called for an emergency session of the UN Security Council. And this may not be the end of North Korean trouble-making — South Korean intelligence indicates that their neighbours may be preparing another nuclear test for early 2013.

 

Fukushima fish still hot

{credit}K. Buesseler, Science{/credit}

Data visualization is all the rage these days, but there’s nothing quite like getting the story from points on a graph. In today’s issue of Science, Ken Buesseler of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts provides plots of radioactivity in fish around the ruined Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant that do just that (click image to enlarge).

The Y axis is a logarithmic scale of radioactive caesium in becquerels per kilogram (Bq/Kg). The dashed line isn’t a trend line, it’s the Japanese government’s limit on what they consider safe levels of radioactivity in seafood (100 Bq/Kg). This data is for demersal, or bottom-dwelling fish.

There’s a couple of things the graph tell us: first, there is enough radioactivity in the fish in Fukushima prefecture to seriously hinder commercial fishing. Second, the radioactivity doesn’t seem to have declined in the first year after the accident.

Buesseler speculates that this is because much of the radioactivity has settled into the sediment around the plant. Caesium 137 has a half life of 30 years or more, and this could mean that fish from the region will be inedible for decades to come.

The plots also raise some worrying questions: if caesium is continuing to enter the ecosystem and will enter it for some years to come, how might this affect things in the long term? What will happen as contaminated fish swim outside the area around the plant? Buesseler believes that understanding the patterns of contamination on the sea floor, and how it enters and leaves the food chain, will be crucial to managing local fish stocks in the coming years.

Missile defence needs networking

 

{credit}MDA{/credit}

A report out this morning from the US National Academy of Sciences calls on the nation’s Missile Defense Agency to take a new tack on the age-old problem of stopping ballistic missiles before they fall on the homeland.

The report authors say it is time to abandon airborne lasers and super-fast interceptors that can catch a missile in its vulnerable boost phase (when it is attached to its rocket). Instead, the programme needs to network existing technologies together so that they can actually hit something travelling through the air.

The report backs up a 2003 study by the American Physical Society that essentially ruled out boost-phase technologies. In fact, the United States has been backing away from boost-phase-intercept technology, and it essentially ended its two main programmes in 2010. Continue reading