Playing Dumb – Does being in a group setting affect your IQ?

Marcia Malory began her academic career as a chemistry student but ended up receiving a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Brooklyn College of the City University of New York. Since then, she has worked in various industries in the United States and the United Kingdom. She is interested in how science, culture and politics interact.  Visit her website or follow her on Twitter @sciencefindout.  

Do you ever downplay your intelligence when you are around others? Recently, an experiment was performed to determine how being in a group setting affects IQ test results. University students took pencil and paper IQ tests to determine their baseline IQ scores. They were not told their results.

Afterwards, the subjects had to take another IQ test – a multiple-choice exam given on a computer. Subjects were divided into groups of five. After answering a question, each was told how she or he ranked compared with the other four members of the group and the relative rank of one other group member. The researchers focused on subjects who had scored about the same on the baseline IQ test; they had a mean IQ of 126.

Although all of the subjects had similar baseline IQs, the results on the computer test varied widely. The IQs of some subjects stayed about the same, but the IQs of other subjects dropped dramatically. The researchers divided the test takers into two groups – “high performers”, who scored above the new median, and “low performers”, who scored below that median. The IQs of the low performers dropped by an average of 17.4 points. Continue reading

23 and Me CEO Wojcicki on turning 150,000 DNA tests into a research database

23andMe, which started out in 2006 as a “personal genome service,” offers DNA analysis to consumers for $299 over the Internet. Now the California-based company is building a research program with crowdsourced data from its 150,000 customers. Company scientists have published several papers.

Continue reading

A lesson from ENCODE about the limits on Human Reason

untitled.bmpDavid Ropeik is an international consultant in risk perception and risk communication, and an Instructor in the Environmental Management Program at the Harvard University Extension School. He is the author of How Risky Is It, Really? Why Our Fears Don’t Always Match the Facts and principal co-author of RISK A Practical Guide for Deciding What’s Really Safe and What’s Really Dangerous in the World Around You. He writes the blog Risk; Reason and Reality at Big Think.com and also writes for Huffington Post,  Psychology Today,  and Scientific American.

He founded the program “Improving Media Coverage of Risk,” was an award-winning journalist in Boston for 22 years and a Knight Science Journalism Fellow at MIT.

The post below was written in the days immediately after the release of the ENCODE papers and includes both a foolish factual error and a tone which, upon reflection and with feedback from many critics, is harsh. A subsequent post at Risk: Reason and Reality “New Evidence About DNA, and Old Patterns of Resistance to New Ideas”    attempts to rectify the error and make my argument more respectfully.  

In what should be another blow to the hubris of human intellect, we have a new entry in the long and ever growing list of  “Really Big Things Scientists Believed” that turned out be wrong. This one is about DNA, that magical strand of just four amino acids*, Adenine paired with Thymine, Cytosine paired with Guanine, millions of those A-T and C-G pairs linked together in various combinations to make the genes that spit out the blueprints for the proteins that make us. Or so science believed. Continue reading

Socially Assistive Robots that Care: Surprisingly likeable and, hopefully soon, surprisingly helpful

Maja Mataric´ is a professor of Computer Science, Neuroscience, and Pediatrics at the University of Southern California, founding director of the USC Center for Robotics and Embedded Systems, co-director of the USC Robotics Research Lab and Vice Dean for Research in the USC Viterbi School of Engineering. She received her PhD in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence from MIT in 1994, MS in Computer Science from MIT in 1990, and BS in Computer Science from the University of Kansas in 1987. She is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Fellow of the IEEE, and recipient of the Presidential Awards for Excellence in Science, Mathematics & Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM), the Okawa Foundation Award, NSF Career Award, the MIT TR100 Innovation Award, and the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society Early Career Award. She served as the elected president of the USC faculty and the Academic Senate. At USC she has been awarded the Viterbi School of Engineering Service Award and Junior Research Award, the Provost’s Center for Interdisciplinary Research Fellowship, the Mellon Mentoring Award, the Academic Senate Distinguished Faculty Service Award, and a Remarkable Woman Award. She is featured in the science documentary movie “Me & Isaac Newton”, in The New Yorker (“Robots that Care” by Jerome Groopman, 2009), Popular Science (“The New Face of Autism Therapy”, 2010), the IEEE Spectrum (“Caregiver Robots”, 2010), and is one of the LA Times Magazine 2010 Visionaries. More details here.

The recently released movie “Robot & Frank” features an elderly, and quite curmudgeonly, thief named Frank, whose family provides a caregiving robot to take care of his needs.  The robot’s capabilities in the movie are well beyond the current engineering state of the art, but, ironically, most people won’t find the robot unrealistic (though it is), but they may find the bond that forms between the robot and Frank hard to believe (yet it is realistic according to latest research). Continue reading

Beginnings – Top 10 Tips to Succeed in Your PhD

Thursday 26th July saw the launch of SciLogs.com, a new English language science blog network. SciLogs.com, the brand-new home for Nature Network bloggers, forms part of the SciLogs international collection of blogs which already exist in GermanSpanish and Dutch. To celebrate this addition to the NPG science blogging family, some of the NPG blogs are publishing posts focusing on “Beginnings”.

Participating in this cross-network blogging festival is nature.com’s Soapbox Science blogScitable’s Student Voices blog and bloggers from SciLogs.com, SciLogs.deScitable and Scientific American’s Blog Network. Join us as we explore the diverse interpretations of beginnings – from scientific examples such as stem cells to first time experiences such as publishing your first paper. You can also follow and contribute to the conversations on social media by using the #BeginScights hashtag.   

Marialuisa Aliotta is a Senior Lecturer at the School of Physics and Astronomy of the University of Edinburgh and carries out research in experimental Nuclear Astrophysics. She is also the curator of the Nuclear Astrophysics Magazine and of Scientific Academic Writing. Her blog, Academic Life, is aimed at providing resources for aspiring and established academics. To find our more, visit: www.marialuisaaliotta.com

“The only way to find out how to do a PhD is to do one.

Therefore all advice is useless…”

                                                                                                                                               Richard Butterworth

 So, you have just graduated and are about to start a PhD. Well done and congratulations! This is certainly an important milestone in your education and you deserve to celebrate both an end and a new beginning. No doubt you are expecting exciting times ahead and plenty of new experiences and opportunities. For the luckiest of you, your PhD might turn out to be an easy ride. For most, however, it will not be all rosy as you first thought. Continue reading

Beginnings – How to write your first grant proposal

Thursday 26th July saw the launch of SciLogs.com, a new English language science blog network. SciLogs.com, the brand-new home for Nature Network bloggers, forms part of the SciLogs international collection of blogs which already exist in GermanSpanish and Dutch. To celebrate this addition to the NPG science blogging family, some of the NPG blogs are publishing posts focusing on “Beginnings”.

Participating in this cross-network blogging festival is nature.com’s Soapbox Science blogScitable’s Student Voices blog and bloggers from SciLogs.com, SciLogs.deScitable and Scientific American’s Blog Network. Join us as we explore the diverse interpretations of beginnings – from scientific examples such as stem cells to first time experiences such as publishing your first paper. You can also follow and contribute to the conversations on social media by using the #BeginScights hashtag.   

Faye is a civil engineering professor at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, who studies river ice processes and dynamics.  She has served on, and chaired, grant selection committees for Canada’s Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grants program and for Canada’s International Polar Year research program.  Faye has a few blogs you might want to check out: “Help for New Professors” provides (often humorous) advice to early career academics and “The Art of Scientific Writing” provides much needed advice on technical writing to graduate students in science and engineering.  Check out Faye’s “River Ice Photo Blog” for beautiful pictures featuring the weird and wonderful world of river ice.

Many thanks to Nature for inviting me to write a guest post for the “Beginnings” series.  I’ve been asked to offer advice to young academics who are facing the daunting task of writing their first grant proposal.  This is a broad topic and, to a great extent, the specific approach is highly dependent upon the agency you’re targeting with your application.  In that context, it’s critical to read the instructions they provide.  Apparently, ~80% of people don’t do that. Amazing! However, beyond that, there are some general tips that apply universally and that’s what I’ll be focusing on today. Continue reading

Beginnings – Dos and Don’ts for first time Networkers

Thursday 26th July saw the launch of SciLogs.com, a new English language science blog network. SciLogs.com, the brand-new home for Nature Network bloggers, forms part of the SciLogs international collection of blogs which already exist in GermanSpanish and Dutch. To celebrate this addition to the NPG science blogging family, some of the NPG blogs are publishing posts focusing on “Beginnings”.

Participating in this cross-network blogging festival is nature.com’s Soapbox Science blogScitable’s Student Voices blog and bloggers from SciLogs.com, SciLogs.deScitable and Scientific American’s Blog Network. Join us as we explore the diverse interpretations of beginnings – from scientific examples such as stem cells to first time experiences such as publishing your first paper. You can also follow and contribute to the conversations on social media by using the #BeginScights hashtag.   

Pursuing an academic career in Palaeontology, Jon began university life as a geologist, following this with a course in biodiversity and taxonomy. While preparing for a PhD in vertebrate macroevolution at Imperial College, he is currently working on policy at the Geological Society. He blogs at https://fossilsandshit.wordpress.com/, tweets as Protohedgehog and co-runs an impending podcast series called Palaeocast.

It’s that time. You’ve been holding it off for as long as possible, but now the inevitable is upon you. You have to attend your first conference. You have to meet and be scrutinised by your peers, while convincing them that you are someone of value to the research community. Your first conference can break you as an academic, or you can leave so richly fulfilled that all you want to do from now on is attend them. The key is picking the right one. Larger international conferences can be a bit overwhelming. You want something a bit more chilled out, a bit more intimate, and a bit cheaper if possible. Break yourself in nice and easy. Continue reading

Beginnings – Writing your first science paper

Thursday 26th July saw the launch of SciLogs.com, a new English language science blog network. SciLogs.com, the brand-new home for Nature Network bloggers, forms part of the SciLogs international collection of blogs which already exist in GermanSpanish and Dutch. To celebrate this addition to the NPG science blogging family, some of the NPG blogs are publishing posts focusing on “Beginnings”.

Participating in this cross-network blogging festival is nature.com’s Soapbox Science blogScitable’s Student Voices blog and bloggers from SciLogs.com, SciLogs.deScitable and Scientific American’s Blog Network. Join us as we explore the diverse interpretations of beginnings – from scientific examples such as stem cells to first time experiences such as publishing your first paper. You can also follow and contribute to the conversations on social media by using the #BeginScights hashtag.   

 

Michelle Wynn is a PhD candidate in Bioinformatics at the University of Michigan, working under the supervision of Sofia Merajver and Santiago Schnell .  Her thesis work involves the use of systems biology methods to understand the dysregulated signaling and metabolic networks associated with breast cancer development.  Her long-term goal is to direct a multidisciplinary research group that operates at the interface of theoretical and experimental cancer biology.  She hopes to defend soon.

In graduate school first-author publications are especially important because they represent a key milestone in the transition from trainee to independent researcher – something we all work very hard to achieve.   In October of last year I published my very first first-author research paper.  It was a lot of work and took far longer to write than I anticipated.  I know first-hand that preparing a manuscript can be very difficult and stressful – especially the first time.  I learned a great many things throughout the writing and submission process.   Below, I have listed three of the most important things I learned in the hope that they may be useful to others.

Continue reading

Beginnings – Bunch of Fives – Why Blogging is Great, and Tips for Starting

Thursday 26th July saw the launch of SciLogs.com, a new English language science blog network. SciLogs.com, the brand-new home for Nature Network bloggers, forms part of the SciLogs international collection of blogs which already exist in German, Spanish and Dutch. To celebrate this addition to the NPG science blogging family, some of the NPG blogs are publishing posts focusing on “Beginnings”.

Participating in this cross-network blogging festival is nature.com’s Soapbox Science blog, Scitable’s Student Voices blog and bloggers from SciLogs.com, SciLogs.de, Scitable and Scientific American’s Blog Network. Join us as we explore the diverse interpretations of beginnings – from scientific examples such as stem cells to first time experiences such as publishing your first paper. You can also follow and contribute to the conversations on social media by using the #BeginScights hashtag.   

 

Suzi Gage is a PhD student based at the University of Bristol. She’s researching cannabis and tobacco use, and their relationship with psychosis and depression, using Children of the 90s, a birth cohort based in Bristol. In her spare time she blogs, sings, knits, tweets and reads. Her blog, Sifting the Evidence, can be found here

I’ve always enjoyed journalism and writing; at school I edited the school mag one year, and I was a music journalist for Pi, UCL’s magazine while studying there, despite being a scientist at heart. Once I left Uni though, the opportunities for writing somewhat disappeared. I started working as a Research Assistant in Bristol, and the thought of journalism left me somewhat. But when I started my PhD, I realised I wanted science communication to be a big part of my studies. My topic of research (cannabis and mental health outcomes) is likely to generate some media interest, so I wanted to be as good as possible at explaining my science. But it was taking part in I’m a Scientist Get Me Out of Here that really showed me the value of science outreach. The scheme involved a lot of science writing, as all questions are answered in text form, but I was speaking to teenagers, so a completely different scientific language was required. Continue reading

There is no “normal”

Dr. Chris Gunter is the HudsonAlpha director of research affairs. She earned a bachelor’s degree in both genetics and biochemistry from the University of Georgia, and a Ph.D. in genetics from Emory University.  Her research was centered on human genetics and genomics. Chris has also earned publishing experience at several journals, including editorial positions at Human Molecular Genetics and Science, and as the editor for genetics and genomics manuscripts at Nature. Upon starting to publish genome papers at Nature in 2002, Chris told her boss that if they ever got the platypus genome published, it would be time to move on. She started at the nonprofit HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology in 2008 and coordinates research activities in genetics and genomics. She creates and maintains an academic environment and communicates HudsonAlpha’s research in a variety of different formats and public venues.
Chris also holds adjunct appointments at three universities, is an editor of the blog Double X Science, and currently serves on the Program Committee and as the chair of the Communications Committee for the American Society of Human Genetics. For probably too much info, see her @girlscientist on Twitter. Continue reading