Circular logic?

What causes autism? The lack of answers or even particularly good leads is frustrating to say the least. Not surprisingly, people both within the scientific community and the general public are hungry for answers, and my general opinion is that the more information the better. However, I’m a little puzzled by a report from the British Association for the Advancement of Science’s annual Festival of Science.

According to Simon Baron-Cohen‘s ’extreme male brain’ theory, people with autism show extreme versions of behaviors that are normal in men. In general, men tend to empathize less and systematize more than women. These drives are taken to an extreme degree in people with autism, resulting in the behaviors associated with autism, including reduced eye contact and verbal skills and increased repetitive behavior and orderliness, according to Baron-Cohen.

Is the hormone that causes male behaviors involved in autism? At the Festival of Science, Baron-Cohen and Bonnie Auyeng reported that fetal testosterone contributed to ‘autistic traits’ in normal eight-year-old children. The researchers calculated an ‘autism spectrum quotient’ from questionnaires about children’s social behaviors and cognitive skills completed by their mothers. Fetal testosterone levels recorded eight years earlier accounted for more than 20% of the variability in this quotient.

According to the researchers, these data suggest that elevated testosterone levels in the womb may contribute to traits associated with autism. However, based on the researchers’ reasoning, wouldn’t an alternative explanation be that fetal testosterone correlates with male-typical behaviors? Animal studies have shown that testosterone produced in the fetal testes masculinizes the brain (allowing male-typical behavioral patterns). Perhaps the present study indicates that male-typical behaviors are graded, with high levels of fetal testosterone producing ‘super males’.

While interesting, it’s not clear to me that these data are directly relatable to autism. For that, we’ll need to see Baron-Cohen’s next study, involving clinical data and amniotic samples from 90,000 people with and without autism.

Spare change

Nominations open Monday for the first Kavli prizes in neuroscience, astrophysics and nanoscience. One $1,000,000 prize will be awarded for each of the three fields in Norway next year. Sound like another Scandanavian award? Unlike Nobel prizes, which tend to reward scientists at the ends of their careers, the Kavli Prize will recognize innovation, according to a recent article in Time magazine. Fred Kavli, a Norwegian physicist/business mogul/philanthropist, has been funding giant awards for (the odd mix of scientific pursuits) neuroscience, astrophysics and nanoscience research at universities, like Caltech, Harvard, MIT and Cambridge. So, if you know of a deserving neuroscientist, the application deadline is 15 December.

Down the drain

If you think managing chemical waste in your lab is like throwing money down the drain, imagine how Daniel Storm feels. According to the Seattle Post Intelligencer, rather than paying $15,000 to properly dispose of 5 cans of ethyl ether, the professor of pharmacology at the University of Washington took an axe to them and poured them down the drain. According to Nature, Storm falsified waste manifest sheets in an attempt to cover up the crime. Storm was sentenced to 3 years of probation, 80 hours of community service and a $5,000 fine in U. S. District Court and is undergoing university disciplinary review.

Like most people who have had to sit through the courses and fill out the monthly paperwork required to dispose of anything other than water, I can understand Storm’s frustration. Do people in hazmat suits really need to close down a building over a broken thermometer? However, you don’t have to be an environmentalist to realize that pouring an extremely flammable liquid into university pipes isn’t a terribly smart thing to do.