Biron et al.

A diacylglycerol kinase modulates long-term thermotactic behavioral plasticity in C. elegans

Worms can be ‘taught’ to prefer different temperatures. Here the authors report that worms lacking the kinase DGK-3 are very slow temperature learners. As DGK-3 is a crucial enzyme in the degradation of the signaling mediator DAG, authors hypothesize that DAG levels in thermosensory neurons determine worms’ temperature preferences, and confirm this idea experimentally.

Hall et al.

A neuregulin 1 variant associated with abnormal cortical function and psychotic symptoms

Variants in the NRG1 gene may confer an elevated risk for schizophrenia. The authors here have followed for up to 10 years a group of young people from families affected by schizophrenia. They found that one particular SNP in the NRG1 gene promotor region, substituting a T for a C nucleotide, correlates with low IQ and high risk for the disease.

Darrow et al.

Cochlear efferent feedback balances interaural sensitivity

Sound location requires that the brainstem compare the very slim difference in input from the two ears. This study suggests that feedback from the olivary complex to the auditory nerve is required to keep the signals from both cochleas in balance, enabling this comparison. One of our referees called this paper “one of the most interesting manuscripts I have ever reviewed.”

When Monkeys Fly

Yesterday, I went to see Michael Crichton speak at the National Press Club. I was hoping he’d speak about his new book Next, which is a novel about the danger of being ill-prepared for advances in genetics. According to the New York Times, the book includes subplots about ethical missteps by autism researchers and the legal ramifications of the ‘thrill-seeking gene.’ Instead of directly discussing his book, Crichton, whose scientific qualifications include fictional works about cloned dinosaurs and evil monkeys, lectured about science policy and ethics.

It’s not that I didn’t agree with some of Crichton’s points. He discussed the folly of gene patents, the problems with peer review, the need for data replication and the importance of open access. He called on the media to publicize the limitations in scientific studies and suggested that the government should police the release and replication of data.

What I resented was that he presented himself as a lone watchdog in a world in which scientists have taken advantage of the public. He’s right that truth has become a casualty in our society. But there’s something wrong when the public relies on a fiction writer to inform them of the truth.