Somatic mutations in histone H3 in pediatric brain tumors

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) are aggressive subtypes of brain tumors that both have a very poor prognosis and are almost always lethal. Two new studies in Nature and this journal today identify the same recurrent mutations in H3F3A in pediatric cases of glioblastoma multiforme and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. These are the first reports of human disease associated with mutations in histones, which play an extraordinarily important and conserved role in chromatin structure and gene regulation. With the recent spate of papers reporting somatic mutations in chromatin remodelers in various types of cancer (examples from this journal alone include the histone H3K27 demethylase UTX, transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, histone methyltransferase EZH2 in follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and myeloid disorders, DNMT3A in AML, ARID2 in hepatocellular carcinoma, MLL2 in DLBCL, and ARID1a in gastric cancer) it is clear that targeting the chromatin remodeling machinery will be an important area in the development of new cancer drugs.

 

Around 3000 children are diagnosed with brain tumors each year in the United States. DIPG is a type of aggressive brainstem tumor that occurs almost only in children. The Nature study reports somatic mutations in the H3.3-ATRX-DAXX chromatin remodeling pathway in 44% (21/48) of tumors, while the Nature Genetics study reports mutations in either H3.1 or H3.3 in 60% (52/86) of tumors. Remarkably, the Nature Genetics study finds that 78% (39/50) of DIPG tumors display a p.Lys27Met change in either histone H3.1 or H3.3.

 

Suzanne Baker and colleagues report in this journal today whole-genome sequences of 7 DIPGs and matched normal tissue. Four of the tumors harbored a p.Lys27Met change in H3.3 and one of the tumors showed a p.Lys27Met change in the related histone variant H3.1. The authors subsequently sequenced the genes encoding H3.3 (H3F3A) and H3.1 (HIST1H3B) in 43 more DIPGs and 36 non-brainstem pediatric glioblastomas. In total, 39/50 DIPGs carried a p.Lys27Met change in H3F3A or HIST1H3B. 13/36 non-brainstem pediatric glioblastomas harbored a p.Lys27Met change in H3F3A or HIST1H3B or a p.Gly34Arg change in H3F3A. The authors also sequenced the16 histone H3 genes in other types of pediatric brain tumors but found no other histone H3 mutations in these lower-grade tumor subtypes.

 

Nada Jabado and colleagues report in Nature today 48 whole exomes of pediatric GBMs, as well as matched normal tissue for 6 of those samples. Two of these samples harbored the p.Lys27Met change in H3.3 and 2 samples harbored a p.Gly34Arg change in H3.3. After extending the analysis to 48 whole exomes, the authors found that 44% (21/48) of samples harbored mutations in H3F3A, ATRX or DAXX. It is particularly notable that the two amino acids affected in H3.3 (K27 and G34) are at or in close proximity to sites that are important post-translational modifications. Trimethylation of K27 (H3K27me3) is associated with silencing of genes whereas K36 is associated with transcriptional activation.

 

Mutations in histones have not been reported in cancer (or in any other human disease), although somatic mutations in genes regulating histone modifications have been reported in cancer. It is clear that different histone variants are associated with different chromatin and transcriptional states. In particular, H3.3 is enriched at sites of active gene transcription and regulatory elements. Jabado and colleagues speculate that the finding of the same mutations in different tumors, plus the lack of truncating mutations, suggests that these mutations here are gain-of-function. However, the precise mechanism of action is hard to predict. Analysis of gene expression in 27 of the whole-exome samples shows that tumors with the K27 or G36 mutations have distinct profiles, suggesting that each mutation leads to tumors in different ways. Regardless, both papers show a central role for the chromatin remodeling machinery in pediatric gliomagenesis and mutations in histones as another way that epigenetic events drive cancer.

Marking the launch of this blog and our journal

We launched Free Association in November 2005, as one of the first two Nature Publishing Group journal blogs. Our blog was launched as a pioneering effort by our then Senior Editor Alan Packer (who has since moved to a position as Associate Director for Research at the Simons Foundation ), as a new way for the editors of Nature Genetics to engage our community.  We did so with excitement about interacting and discussing papers and community issues on a more informal level than is possible in our print publication.  At the same time, I recall that we (the Nature Genetics editors at the time) shared some concerns about what we would be able to discuss, given the confidential nature of the peer review process. We also wondered if our community of authors, reviewers, and readers alike would manage to find time and interest in posting on our site.  While these concerns have in some part remained, we have a new perspective as we move into the 7th year of this blog and with the launch of this new site. 

Over these years, we have maintained Free Association as an editor driven blog, used to highlight and discuss our own content, press and feedback from the community, and to announce special events.  We will continue to post on these topics, and are also welcoming guest posts on topics relevant to our own content and our genetics/genomics community.

We have also experimented with using this blog as a means to discuss and develop community standards and research guidelines relevant to our community, but we have now shifted to using the data standards section of Nature Precedings  for this purpose. 

This year also marks the 20th anniversary of the launch of Nature Genetics.  I have been fortunate enough to be an editor here since 2004 (yes, I do remember our pages pre-GWAS), and have to admit that every year I find myself saying that this is one of the most exciting times to be in this field.  We have much to celebrate in advances within the genetics and genomics communities.   All I will say for now is that you should stay closely tuned for how we will mark this anniversary.  Comments and suggestions are of course welcome. 

Orli Bahcall

Senior Editor, Nature Genetics