Marcus du Sautoy: Communicating Science within the Sciences and to the Public

Marcus du Sautoy. A passionate advocate for the "wonders of science".

Marcus du Sautoy. A passionate advocate for the “wonders of science”.

Marcus du Sautoy, OBE, is the Simonyi Professor for Public Understanding of Science and a Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford. He is known for his efforts in popularizing mathematics and has been named by The Independent on Sunday as one of the UK’s leading scientists. He was a recipient of the London Mathematical Society’s prestigious Berwick Prize in 2001, which is awarded every two years to reward the best mathematical research by a mathematician under forty.

Du Sautoy writes for the Times and the Guardian and has presented numerous television and radio programmes, including The Story of Maths, School of Hard Sums and The Code. He is also the author of many academic articles and books including the best-selling The Music of the Primes and The Num8er My5teries: A Mathematical Odyssey Through Everyday Life.

When mathematician Marcus du Sautoy was appointed the prestigious role of the Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at the University of Oxford back in October 2008, he had two distinct priorities looming prominently in his mind.

The job brief was clear in its motives at the time and reflected on the one-hand high-level science, and on the other, the ability to communicate this scientific research widely to a public audience. The latter was the first priority. Stepping into fill the boots of the inaugural holder Richard Dawkins, was by no means an easy feat, but du Sautoy also a Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford, took to the role naturally.

“When I took over from Richard, my immediate thoughts were on clearly communicating to the public what was happening in science,” says du Sautoy. “Science has such a big impact on humanity. In order for people to feel empowered and for them to be able to make decisions on where they want science to go and the long lasting effects it has on society, they must first fully understand the surrounding issues.”

The second role of his job, encouraging the communication of science between disciplines within the sciences, is perhaps the most intriguing, in terms of developments. The biggest challenges, du Sautoy says, are the “inbuilt education system” and the “linguistic barriers” across the sciences. “This is a fascinating area where across academia we’re looking to break down the silo mentality which I believe has been prevalent in most universities across the world”, asserts du Sautoy. “This is partly due to the time and hard work we put into our own specialist subject meaning there often isn’t time to see what’s happening in other areas.”

Continue reading

Voyager 1 Reaches Interstellar Space

Bohle headshotShannon Bohle has experience with NASA, is a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society in the UK,  is a lifetime member of the Cambridge University Astronomical Society, and has held  professional memberships in the AAAS, the British Society for the History of Science, The National Space Society, The Planetary Society, and The Mars Society. She is  a registered consultant for the Science and Entertainment Exchange run by the National Academy of Sciences.

Boldly Traveling Where No Archival Recording has Gone Before

On 12 September 2013, following analysis of data from its Voyager 1 spacecraft, NASA confirmed that the spacecraft has now reached a new milestone; interstellar space. It seems fitting that Carl Sagan, astronomy popularizer and pioneer in the field of exobiology, wanted to send library materials. Inside the box-like portion of the spacecraft, called the satellite bus structure, is the first archival sound recording designed to be understood by non-human intelligent life. If intelligent life is out there, let’s just hope they enjoy our first publication so much that they visit Earth to request a library card.

SCI Space Craft International, www.SpacecraftKits.com

SCI Space Craft International, www.SpacecraftKits.com. Click on the image to enlarge 

Infographic about the Voyager spacecraft showing the location of the image and sound recordings. “The SCI ‘Fact Sheet’ graphic products, for Voyager and other interplanetary spacecraft, have been seen in the hands of flight team members as well as enthusiasts among the public. The box structure is called the spacecraft bus. The circular, gold-plated information package is mounted to the outboard face of one of [the bus’s] ten bays.”

Voyager, A Look Back

Kicking the proverbial wheels and dipping the oil stick, on 5 September 1977 NASA launched Voyager 1 from Kennedy Space Flight Center. By 1979 it was whipping past Jupiter, and by 1980 it completed a flyby of Saturn and began a course that would take it out of the solar system:

You are currently viewing a placeholder content from YouTube. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.

More Information

Video credit: NASA JPL

pale blue dot

“This narrow-angle color image of the Earth, dubbed ‘Pale Blue Dot’, is a part of the first ever ‘portrait’ of the solar system taken by Voyager 1. The spacecraft acquired a total of 60 frames for a mosaic of the solar system from a distance of more than 4 billion miles from Earth and about 32 degrees above the ecliptic. From Voyager’s great distance Earth is a mere point of light, less than the size of a picture element even in the narrow-angle camera. Earth was a crescent only 0.12 pixel in size. Coincidentally, Earth lies right in the center of one of the scattered light rays resulting from taking the image so close to the sun. This blown-up image of the Earth was taken through three color filters — violet, blue and green — and recombined to produce the color image. The background features in the image are artifacts resulting from the magnification.”
(Description and image credit: NASA JPL).

In 1990, the spacecraft lost the ability to return photos to Earth. Its last image, Pale Blue Dot, has become a famous look back at our planet that shows just how small our world really is in the vastness of our solar system. It was also used in the title of and inspiration for science writer Carl Sagan’s book, Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space (1994).     

How Does NASA Know Voyager 1
Reached Interstellar Space?

There are some arguments about whether or not Voyager 1 has left the solar system. The term solar system is most commonly used to refer to the inner solar system which includes the sun and planets. So, yes, Voyager 1 left the inner solar system in 1990. On its journey, it continued towards the edge of the heliosphere. “The heliosphere is the immense magnetic bubble containing our [inner] solar system, solar wind, and the entire solar magnetic field.” In 2012, the probe passed the edge of the heliosphere, called the heliopause, which separates the heliosphere from the interstellar medium. The heliopause “traps” the stellar wind (which carries dust and particles) and does not let it escape into the interstellar medium. The term interstellar literally means “the space between stars,” the place where Voyager 1 is now located. (The plural of “interstellar medium” is “interstellar media,” from which is derived the title of this piece). The problem with saying that Voyager 1 is no longer in the solar system is that, technically speaking, the solar system (comprised of both the inner and outer solar system) is an area where any body is primarily influenced by the gravitational pull of a star, like our sun. Since the 1960s, scientists have agreed that the sun’s gravitational influence extends into the Oort Cloud, a very large region, but they are not sure how far into the Oort Cloud to draw the boundary of what could be considered our solar system. Clearly, then, Voyager is located in the interstellar medium but has not left the solar system.

v timeline

Voyager: The Grand Journey and Beyond.
(Image credit: NASA JPL)

As the sun “burns” it emits particles of light and heat released during nuclear reactions called hydrogen fusion. The energies from these reactions propel charged particles (called plasma) into space, sometimes through large bursts called prominences. Large prominences are called Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) while smaller ones are solar flares. Sometimes these particles hit the Earth in large doses, during space weather events, and are often referred to as solar storms or geomagnetic storms. Depending on their strength, which is measured and monitored by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other agencies, these particles can cause a variety of problems for communications satellites and the International Space Station orbiting the Earth as well as electronic equipment on Earth.

According to researchers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), when plasma passes through space within the heliosphere it would hit a detector “uniformly from all directions,” but particles that reached Voyager 1 as a result of the “St. Patrick’s Day Solar Storms” a year earlier showed different results. “Sunspot AR1429 unleashed a powerful X5-class solar flare detected by solar observing satellites and Earth on 7 March 2012, commencing the ‘St. Patrick’s Day storms’ of 2012.” Unusual readings continued to be detected from May through July 2012. According to NASA JPL, it took about 400 days (beginning 11 April 2013) for each solar outburst to have reached Voyager. See this video: Voyager 1 at the Final Frontier.

After the readings were taken it only took about 16 hours for Voyager’s radio waves to travel back to Earth. By 25 August 2012, scientists believed that Voyager had made it into interstellar space. Instead of normal readings, they said, “particles [were] hitting Voyager from some directions more than others” and sound recorded “oscillations increased in pitch,” like a shriek, indicating that the spacecraft had moved into a very different plasma environment, one that was nearly twice as dense as inside the heliosphere. Since this method for determining location had never been done before, they said, it took researchers at NASA over a year to be certain and to verify the data. See this video: Voyager Reaches Interstellar Space.

The heliopause boundary is created because in addition to plasma moving through space from the sun, so too is the solar magnetic field. The interstellar magnetic field, which is composed of ions like those found in hydronium, repels the adjacent solar magnetic field, creating a “bubble” of space called the heliopause which has previously been defined as the outer edge of the solar system. The magnetic field, while strong enough to create a barrier for radiation, is not strong enough to pose a problem for a metallic spacecraft passing through this boundary just as spacecraft are able to leave the Earth’s atmosphere.

Set a Course for the Oort Cloud–Engage!

oort

NASA JPL

Voyager still has a long way to go before leaving the solar system even though it is travelling at a rate of 37,000 miles per hour (60,000 km per hour). The spacecraft is presently 11.7 billion miles (18.8 billion kilometers) from Earth. Still, it will take an estimated “300 years for Voyager 1 to reach the inner edge of the Oort Cloud and possibly about 30,000 years to fly beyond it.” In 40,000 years it is expected to reach the constellation Camelopardalis. That’s long after you and I will live. To put it into perspective, should any intelligent life actually receive the message it is unlikely humanity (if it has managed to survive) will resemble anything like what is depicted in the recordings. If anything, it may serve as a record of our history, much like cave drawing of primitive humanoids 40,000 years ago during the Upper Paleolithic era (the “Later Stone Age”) does for us today. Interestingly, we are sending the message roughly at the midpoint of our communication technologies: analog stone tools, digital tools, and who knows what else 40,000 years from now.

Radio and television signals have long since left our solar system, so chances are that any non-human intelligent life in the universe would encounter those first, and view the Voyager 1 disk as an artifact. Nevertheless, unless faster than light transportation is turned from science fiction into science fact, Voyager 1’s “gold record” may be the first “Galactic hit” in terms of physical information objects from Earth held by an otherworldly civilization.

 

This blog post will be continued over on Shannon’s SciLogs blog

Tear Down These Walls

DSC_0190

Buddhini Samarasinghe is a molecular biologist with experience in cancer research. She completed her PhD at the University of Glasgow, UK and then recently completed a postdoctoral position at the University of Hawaii. Her science writing can be found at Jargonwall. She is also a passionate science communicator, engaging the public with current research in the life sciences. Where possible, she uses original research papers and describes the science minus the jargon! She is also involved in science outreach through broadcasts on YouTube and other social media sites.

On a cold weeknight in late November, 1660, a dozen men gathered in the rooms at Gresham College in London to found the Royal Society. Not all of them had a scientific background; some of them were lawyers, politicians, merchants and philosophers. The one thing they all had in common was a thirst for knowledge. The formation of the Royal Society was the coming together of a group of curious gentlemen determined to promote the accumulation and dissemination of useful knowledge. It represented a paradigm shift in the practice of science. The Royal Society invented scientific publishing and peer review, two major developments that redefined science from an amateur hobby to the rigorous beast that it is today.

Continue reading

When science becomes personal: a role for personal life in advocacy

StephaniPagePhotoStephani Page is a PhD candidate at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics.  She is a member of the Bourret/Silversmith Lab in the Department of Microbiology & Immunology.  

When a patient is diagnosed with a form of cancer which has the potential to significantly shorten his lifespan, his life takes on a different meaning.   He looks at himself in the mirror, small and frail, and decides to do what it takes to make it through this trial.  Not too long ago, this was my father.  I am the only scientist in my family and, as such, I know that cancer patients, even those who have treatment options, face difficult battles ahead.  Chemotherapy drugs, while potentially adding years to a prognosis, can ravage the body.  Research often focuses on finding new chemotherapy drugs, making current drugs more effective, and minimizing the side effects.

I am a PhD candidate in the Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  One of the labs in my department actually assisted in the development of a chemotherapy drug prescribed for my father’s pancreatic cancer.  For many years I had struggled to explain to my family (made up of homemakers, lawyers, career military, teachers, nurses, etc.) what I do as a scientist and why what scientists do is important.  Suddenly, my family needed no further explanation.
Continue reading

Give conservation a sporting chance

Reading Rhino with Rhino BeetleAlastair Driver, Environment Agency National Biodiversity Manager, has the honour of inclusion in Who’s Who for “distinction and influence” in the field of environmental conservation. He is one of the most experienced river and wetland conservationists in the UK, with a growing international reputation in the field of catchment management.

If you’d told me 35 years ago, after I’d scraped through beer-and-sport-fuelled university with an ecology degree, that I was going to make a living out of conservation, I’d have suggested you should be sectioned. But the fact is that there are now literally thousands of people out there who are professionally employed in conserving and restoring our still beautiful, but quietly ailing natural environment. In fact, there are 200 of them in the Environment Agency alone.

Back in the late 70s when I was cutting my teeth on wildlife surveys, I remember my rugby mates expressing indignance that their taxes were paying for me to “count grass” and suggesting that I had “a girl’s job.” Nowadays ‘the bloke down the pub’ instantly recognises that people like me have a role in society which is both interesting and valuable.

The question is – are we conservationists really making any difference? The simple answer to that is – yes, but just as the environment has suffered near-death by a thousand cuts, so it requires healing by a thousand operations, and that takes time. You can’t spend 200 years damaging the environment and then expect to put it right in the blink of a government. Continue reading

Predators in the publishing jungle

Ian WOOLEY (22-3-2010) _MG_0193

Ian Woolley is an infectious diseases physician who trained in Australia and the United States and who works at Monash Medical Centre in Melbourne. He is also Adjunct Senior Lecturer in the Departments of Medicine and Infectious Diseases at Monash University. In 2012/2013 he completed a sabbatical with the Manson Unit of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) UK during which he helped MSF respond to an outbreak of hepatitis E in South Sudanese refugee camps. 

In April 2013, I decided to count the number of unsolicited emails I received from journals that asked me to read them, write for them, review articles or be an editor for them; or some combination of the above. I counted nearly three dozen in that month alone; all were from journals that were open access in nature in some form. Like most people, I lack the time or knowledge to assess the merit of these journals and to decide whether or not they are bona fide. And until recently, perhaps naively, I hadn’t realised that this might even be necessary. Continue reading

Crossing the great divide – moving between academia and industry

clinicianfellows-052Luke Devey has joined the GSK Esprit R&D Programme as a Director of Translational Medicine. He completed his medical training at the University of Oxford and worked in Oxford, Newcastle and Edinburgh before going on to do an MRC-funded PhD at the University of Birmingham. In 2008 he was awarded an Academy of Medical Sciences/The Health Foundation Clinician Scientist Fellowship, which he undertook alongside training in transplantation and general surgery in Edinburgh.

Working as a doctor in any specialty, it soon becomes clear that medicine is imperfect, and unable to offer good treatments for a great many patients. I have always wanted medicine to think of itself as a ‘technology industry’, using creative research and development (R&D) to seek solutions to the problems of today to shape a better tomorrow.

Until now, my work as a clinical academic has been either at the laboratory bench or at the clinical coalface. As I approached the end of my clinical training and my Clinician Scientist Fellowship, I started to think about what my next move should be. The default position was to continue in clinical academia – very much a known entity. But part of me wanted to explore other opportunities to maximize the translational impact of my work, and I had come to realise that the critical steps on the long path (it takes 15 yrs and 1$bn to make a new medicine) between bench and bedside are most often taken in industry. Continue reading

The presence of a chemical is not the same as presence of risk

Dr. Joe Schwarcz bio pic 2Dr. Schwarcz’s is currently a chemistry professor at McGill University and the Director of McGill University’s Office for Science and Society. He also hosts “The Dr. Joe Show” on Montreal’s CJAD and has appeared on The Discovery Channel, CBC, TV Ontario and other networks. Dr. Schwarcz has received numerous awards for his work, including the American Chemical Society’s Grady-Stack Award for demystifying chemistry and the Canadian Chemical Institute’s “Montreal Medal” recognizing his lifetime contributions to chemistry in Canada. 

“Chemical” is not a dirty word. Nor is it a synonym for “poison” or “toxin.” Chemicals are the basic building blocks of all matter and classifying them as “safe” or “dangerous” is inappropriate. But of course there are safe or dangerous ways of using chemicals. In any case, chemicals are not to be feared or worshipped, they are to be understood. And perhaps the most important point to understand is that the presence of a chemical does not equate to the presence of a risk.

Thanks to our analytical capabilities, we can now routinely detect substances down to the part per trillion (ppt) level. That’s not finding a needle in a haystack; it’s finding a needle in a world full of haystacks. At that level, we can detect a myriad of chemicals should we choose to look for them! And by selectively referencing the scientific literature, the spectra of risk can be readily raised. Continue reading

Can we raise woolly mammoths from their Pleistocene graves?

This post has been cross-posted from the OUP blog.

SL bio picSharon Levy is a freelance science writer who specializes in making natural resource and conservation issues accessible for a broad audience. She is the author of Once and Future Giants, a book that introduces the idea that Ice Age megafauna extinctions hold important lessons for modern conservation. She lives in Humboldt County, California.

Thousands of years after the last woolly mammoth died, some bioengineers dream of resurrecting the species. When I first heard their arguments, these folks struck me as the modern, high-tech version of snake-oil salesmen. The product they’re promoting is not what they lead people to believe it is, and it won’t do what people like to imagine it will.

Mammoths and mastodons once roamed throughout the Americas, as well as much of Europe and Asia. There were several species, but the best-known is the woolly mammoth, a creature of the far north. Well-preserved carcasses have been discovered melting out of the permafrost in Siberia and the Yukon. There’s been a lot of talk of ‘cloning’ a mammoth by using DNA recovered from bodies preserved in permafrost. Continue reading

Scientific publishing 2.0: moving the compute to the data rather than moving the data to the computers

Adrian Giordani has a Masters in Science Communication from Imperial College London, where he was also the Editor-in-Chief of I, Science magazine. He was a science journalist and Interim Editor-in-Chief at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. The publication he worked for, International Science Grid This Week, covers news about science and computing in Europe, the US and Asia Pacific regions. Adrian writes about technology such as supercomputing, grid computing, cloud computing, volunteer computing, networks, big data, software and the science it enables. You can follow him on Twitter.

Today, data-intensive science turns raw data into information and then knowledge. This represents the vision of the late and influential computer scientist, Jim Gray, who divided the evolution of science into four paradigms. One thousand years ago, science was experimental in nature, a few hundred years ago it became theoretical, a few decades ago it moved to a computational discipline, and today it’s data driven. Researchers are reliant on e-science tools to enable collaboration, federation, analysis, and exploration to address the data deluge, currently equal to about 1.2 zettabytes each year. If 11 ounces of coffee equalled one gigabyte, a zettabyte would be the same volume as the Great Wall of China.

So much data is produced that the journal Neuroscience stopped accepting supplementary files along with research manuscripts to enable them to better handle the peer review process. In an attempt to address the challenges presented by so much data, some are combing software, databases and infrastructures to transform the way scientific publishing is done, which has been little changed for centuries. Continue reading