Finding job satisfaction as a venture capitalist

After a brief stint as a general surgeon, and a PhD in translational cancer research from the MRC Cancer Cell Unit, University of Cambridge, UK, Bali Muralidhar changed career direction to venture capital investment.

Read more about Bali’s career transition here.

Bali-Muralidhar-naturejobs-blog

{credit}Image credit: MVM Life Science Partners LLP{/credit}

What happened after you graduated from your PhD in 2008?

Throughout my academic and medical training I had seen a few start-ups come and go, and thought that investing in them could be something I might find interesting.

So after I completed my PhD in 2008, I moved to Bain & Company, a global consulting firm, where I spent time working with healthcare companies. It gave me a wider view of business and essentially replaced an MBA. This proved to be a great introduction for venture capital investment careers.

What skills did you acquire in academia that have been useful during your career in venture capital?

It’s helpful to understand where and how the pitfalls lie in science and how to read a paper. My understanding of the scientific method and ability to analyse different data sets have also been extremely useful.

For example, I’ve been looking at a potential drug that needs to go through a clinical trial before it is approved. Part of my diligence process is to comb through all the patient data, scientific literature, clinical papers, pre-clinical papers etcetera, to work out whether the thesis to the drug makes sense. I then need to work out if the clinical trial design is sound.

What was one of the biggest challenges you faced when switching from academia to venture capital?

As a scientist, you need to do all experiments and collect all the data before making a conclusion. In venture capital, this isn’t always possible. Sometimes you cannot get the data or collecting it is going to take too long, so you need to make the best decision you can with the information that you have. This mindset isn’t easy, but it comes with time and experience.

What do you enjoy most about your work?

I find I’m in a privileged position, seeing cutting edge science and potentially patient-changing companies that you might not see if you were doing niche research in academia, where, often, you’re stuck thinking about one field.

What advice do you have for any scientists looking to work in venture capital?

I wholeheartedly recommend that you get some experience with a consulting firm. These companies give you a wider view of what’s out there. You see lots of different science, work with lots of different people and you get an insight into the commercial world.

The training and professionalism that you get is a really great addition to a PhD. In a PhD you’re used to working in a lab and just with a supervisor; you don’t understand or have much experience of management. A consulting firm gives you the opportunity to develop these skills, which are essential for working in venture capital.

Interview by Julie Gould

A STEM major offers career opportunities in all sectors

On 10 July 2014, the United States Census Bureau published an interactive visualisation of careers that college graduates go on to have, based on data it has collected via the 2012 American Community Survey.

Census-data-visualisation

Screen shot from the US Census Bureau website

The graphic links US graduates who majored in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) to the jobs they went on to do. By moving your mouse over the label for each STEM subject, you can see the main destination occupations for those graduates. For example, the majority of students majoring in biological, environmental and agricultural sciences ended up working outside the STEM occupations, notably in healthcare.

Some interesting patterns emerge from this graphic. For example, almost half of graduates from courses in engineering or computers, mathematics and statistics stay in STEM-related careers. For all other STEM majors, most graduates end up working in other fields.

It’s also interesting to view it from the other direction. Hover your mouse over the occupational group, and you can see the proportion of graduates from each STEM discipline and what subjects these people studied as their major at college (graduates from non-STEM disciplines are not shown on this graphic, but can be found on one of the other tabs). For example, of the STEM graduates in the business and financial sector, the majority are drawn from the social sciences – which might be surprising if, like me, you thought it would be maths.

The graphic also allows you to split the data according to gender, showing, for example, that STEM-related occupations make up a smaller percentage of jobs for women STEM graduates than for men. The data can also be split according to ethnicity.

This shows what the work force of 2012 is doing, and what they studied, and is an interesting but high-level overview. It would also be useful to know, for example, when they graduated, and whether they are following STEM careers in or outside of academia. Although they don’t have that information, they do have something more.

If you dig a little deeper, you’ll find some more stats that the US Census Bureau collected on median estimated earnings of college graduates split by field of bachelor’s degree, occupation, gender, and STEM-specific roles. They also compare STEM eployement rates across all US states. They surveyed “Full-time, year-round civilian employed aged 25 to 64 with a bachelor’s degree or higher level of education.” Below are just a few highlights.

Across the entire sample, the highest median earners were those with a degree in engineering ($92,883) while the lowest were those from the visual and performing arts ($50,684).

The gender difference is stark. The largest pay gap exists between men and women who have received a bachelor’s in physical and related sciences. Here, the median wage for a man with is $89,558. For a woman, it’s $61,907. Across all other bachelor degrees, the difference in median earnings between the sexes is approximately $15,000. But, the data doesn’t show how long people have been working in their respective occupations. they may be comparing people (men and women) who have only just entered the job market with those who have been working for 20 or more years.

The combination of this visualisation with the data on median earnings can be useful for anyone in STEM looking at their career paths. What it shows is that your career choices aren’t limited – US graduates with a STEM major seem to be able to find work in any occupational field, with certain states employing more than others – and certain careers paying more.

Tech-savvy scientists needed for healthcare innovation

Posted on behalf of Kavisha Ramdayal

Innovators with a flair for technology can find lucrative opportunities in healthcare, according to speakers at this year’s BioVision forum in Lyon, France.

Technology can provide cost-cutting solutions in areas such as patient management, where there is substantial room for improvement. In many cases existing technologies can be exploited in innovative ways, such as the use of cellular phones for remote patient monitoring. In addition to telecommunications, other areas of growth include biotechnology, where 3G wireless technologies have already improved diabetes management and care, and nanotechnology.

Studying patient behaviour to identify unmet needs could also lead to new revenue streams, with the internet and social media giving scientists increased access to patient opinion and other data. However, the need to protect patient privacy remains paramount, particularly considering the speed of technology advancement. Alastair Kent, vice-president of the International Genetic Alliance, said new opportunities were emerging, but highlighted the need for responsible technological applications to adhere to regulations and licensing procedures.

The delivery of healthcare technologies also requires a fundamental overhaul if costs are to remain sustainable, said Nicolaus Henke, a consultant at the McKinsey Hospital Institute. If this can be achieved, Henke says technology has a significant role to play in healthcare management – although it should not be considered a substitute for the human touch.

Kent and Henke were speaking at the “How can technology innovation transform healthcare delivery?” session alongside other expert speakers at the BioVision forum.