A celebration of cryo-EM

Here at Nature Methods, we were quite excited yesterday to wake up to the news that the Nobel Prize in Chemistry had been awarded to Jacques Dubochet, Joachim Frank, and Richard Henderson for their seminal developments in cryo-electron microscopy (better known as cryo-EM) which now enable high-resolution biomolecule structure determination. This is a technique we have been watching closely since 2013, when the first papers (including one of our own) realizing the capability of near-atomic-resolution structure determination with cryo-EM were published.

Though much of the excitement about cryo-EM is quite recent, the Nobel Prize is a good reminder to us all that the essential foundations of this technology were laid decades ago. We celebrated such developments, both old and new, in our 2015 Method of the Year issue featuring cryo-EM.

To commemorate this well-deserved Nobel Prize, Nature Research presents an editorially curated collection of papers published in our pages – including methods and protocols, biological results generated using cryo-EM technology, and reviews, news and comment. Check it out!

Nobel thoughts

The Nobel Prize is quite possibly the most anticipated annual event in the scientific community. This year the winners again highlighted the importance of methodological development in scientific progress. Remarkably, the physics, chemistry and medicine prizes all rewarded method and tool developments. This continues, and possibly strengthens, a trend that has become more evident in recent years.

An editorial in the November issue of Nature Methods provides our thoughts on the Nobel Prize and suggests that the addition of a prize dedicated to biology might reduce some of the strain the prize has been experiencing recently and help protect the prize from an erosion of the community support it relies on.

What do you think? Is it ill advised to tamper with something of such stature and history or is it a long overdue change?