Interactions: Conversation with Serhii Plokhy

Post by Christine Horejs

Plokhy Serhii_photo by Tania DAvignonSerhii Plokhy is professor of history at Harvard University and author of the book ‘Chenorbyl – The history of a nuclear catastrophe’, released last week. In his book, he tells the complete history of the nuclear disaster of Chernobyl, from the Soviet excitement about nuclear energy, to the details of the explosion of unit 4, the clean-up, the devastating effects for the people living in Pribyat and the political consequences, culminating in Gorbachev’s policies of glasnost and perestroika and ultimately, the end of the Soviet Union. In Serhii Plokhy’s book, the reader gets to know the personalities involved in the Chernobyl disaster – the director of the nuclear power plant and his family, the operators, the firemen known as liquidators, the doctors in the hospitals trying to handle a disease that they were not trained to treat and the Russian and Ukrainian politicians, who tried their best to hide what had happened. Serhii Plokhy’s book is as compelling as a novel and describes this tragedy not only from a scientific, but also from a political and personal perspective, which makes it a strong testimony to the good and bad of science, and to what can happen if political and scientific responsibility is not taken seriously.

We talked to Serhii Plokhy about his new book and the stories behind it. 

How did the idea for the book ‘Chernobyl’ take shape?

I was interested in the topic for quite a while — after all as someone who lived in the Ukraine in 1986, I knew very well that my own life and the life of many of my friends were affected by the catastrophe. The final decision came on a trip to the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. I realised then that I had to tell the story of Chernobyl for those who were not around at the time.

How was your visit to Pripyat? Would you recommend it?

It was a useful experience, not only for me as a historian and a writer, but also as a human being. You have to see this place to understand the enormity of what has happened and to feel how vulnerable we are as humans. Continue reading

Radio frequencies: The many lives of radio waves

Post by Patrick Michelberger

microwave-link

The radio frequency (rf) range is one of the most technologically exploited portions of the electro-magnetic spectrum. Although the definition is not strict, the rf spectrum commonly refers to waves with frequencies between 20 kHz and 300 GHz. This also includes microwaves, which have frequencies stretching from 300 MHz to 300 GHz. Rf technology was discovered in the early days of modern physics, and it quickly became the cornerstone of mass media broadcasting. Unlike optical signals at higher frequencies, rf waves are generated with electronic circuits comprising a capacitor and an inductor. In these so-called LC circuits, electronic charge carriers can be made to oscillate and, as a consequence, emit electromagnetic radiation at the desired frequency. The faster the oscillation and the smaller the corresponding circuit, the higher the frequency of the emitted waves; amplitude and frequency modulation of the produced waves enables the encoding of information.

Today, nearly all of the rf region plays a role in some form of human communication. Waves in the low (below 30 kHz) to middle (below 300 kHz) range, for instance, bend around the earth and penetrate deeply into water: they are used to contact submarines and set radio clocks. Other well-known examples are television and mobile phone signal transmission, which relies on waves at higher frequencies (below 3 GHz). In the latter – densely populated – portion of the rf spectrum, a recent switch from analog to digital television (which is less demanding in terms of bandwidth) has freed up some bandwidth for mobile data services. Until the 1980s, transmission lines for large amounts of data – the backbones of communication networks preceding the internet, in a sense – operated on microwave links (corresponding to frequencies below 300 GHz). This changed with the advent of solid-state lasers and optical fibres: thanks to the larger bandwidth offered by short laser pulses, optical fibre networks are now the prime technology for the internet. As a result, microwaves seem to have gone somewhat out of fashion – or have they not?

In fact, microwave links have recently enjoyed a revival of interest thanks to a lucrative application known as high-frequency trading. In this area of finance, profit derives from a speed advantage in buying and selling financial instruments such as stocks and currencies. For instance, high-frequency traders will try to profit from small discrepancies on the prices for a single asset traded on different trading venues: if you buy at the cheaper venue and ‘simultaneously’ sell at the more expensive one, you will make a positive return. This sounds surprisingly simple, yet such trading strategies strictly require fast access to both venues in order to detect an opportunity and exploit it before anyone else does. Standard optical fibre networks do not live up to this tight requirement, mainly because fibres do not necessarily run in straight lines between venues such as stock exchanges – for which reason light pulses have to travel additional distances and pick up undesired time delays. Even if there were direct connections, optical fibres’ higher refraction index means that light travels through fibres 1.5 times slower than microwaves propagate in air. To ensure an advantage in this high-stakes game of micro- and nano-seconds, traders have thus reverted back to building private direct microwave links between exchanges: examples of existing links can be found between London and Frankfurt or between Chicago and New York. So beware – never underestimate the reach of radio waves.

Patrick Michelberger
Associate Director – Quantitative Research
Record Currency Management
Morgan House, Madeira Walk,
Windsor, SL4 1EP

Terahertz: Entering applications

Post by Oliver Graydon

spectrum_THz

{credit}Image by Bethany Vukomanovic {/credit}

The electromagnetic spectrum spans a rich range of wavelengths – from short-wavelength, highly energetic x-rays at one end through to long-wavelength radiowaves at the other. While many regions of this spectrum have already been explored by mankind and put to good use there is one that is still largely underexploited – that of terahertz waves. Lying in the region between infrared light and microwaves, terahertz waves (photons with a frequency between ~300 GHz and 10 THz), fall into a gap between the worlds of photonics and electronics. However, in recent years scientists have been increasingly exploring how such terahertz waves can be exploited. Historically, difficulties in efficiently generating and manipulating terahertz waves served as a barrier for the area. However, several developments have changed the fortunes of the field.

The advent of the quantum cascade laser in the mid-1990s provided access to a solid-state laser technology that evolved to emit milliwatts of power of terahertz radiation from a convenient semiconductor device, albeit cooled. More recently, engineered structures called “metamaterials” have been designed that can switch and modulate terahertz waves.

As for applications, researchers have found that terahertz waves can be useful for security screening, in particular. For example, it’s known that terahertz waves can pass through thin layers of clothing and organic materials but are blocked by metals, such as a knife blade, and that certain explosives and pharmaceuticals have a clear absorption fingerprint. As a result, several companies have since commercialized the technology for security scanners for use at airports and elsewhere. Other potential applications include the use of terahertz waves instead of radiowaves as a high-frequency carrier wave for future mobile communications opening the door to ultra-high-bandwidth data connections. There are also efforts to use terahertz waves for biomedical applications such as skin cancer detection, however the strong water absorption of terahertz waves limits many biological applications.

One thing’s for sure: the region is evolving from being a once neglected gap in the electromagnetic spectrum to a highly active area of science that is rich in potential applications and opportunities.

 

Mid-Infrared: the molecular fingerprint region

Post by Nina MeiznerMolecular_Fingerprinting

Mid-infrared (mid-IR) radiation – typically defined as 2.5–10 µm wavelengths (although the exact values can vary) – is not something many of us come across in our daily lives. We can’t see it and we don’t use it for data transmission either. So, why do we care about it at all? Well, mid-infrared radiation can help us identify many materials by their characteristic spectra.

To understand this better, let’s take a little detour into the world of molecules. Even if they don’t move around widely, molecules can be in different excited states: they can stretch along their bonds, vibrate around their centre of mass and rotate around one of their axes. Like a stretching spring or the balance of a watch, these excitations store energy and, of course, energy can be expressed in wavelengths and the energy of many of these rotational and vibrational (ro-vibrational) excitations correspond to mid-IR wavelengths. And because the energy stored in each of these excitations is characteristic to a specific molecule, we can use these spectral fingerprints to identify materials using spectroscopy. That’s why airport security use spectrometers to check for dangerous substances when they swipe your laptop.

While we can use mid-IR radiation to identify materials, materials are also one of the biggest challenges for mid-IR applications because all the materials typically used at shorter wavelengths don’t work the same way at longer wavelengths. For example, the silica glass used for microscope slides, lenses and optical fibres in the visible and near-infrared, is no longer transparent above about 4 µm, forbidding such applications in the mid-IR. Two common silica replacements for the mid-IR are calcium fluoride or chalcogenide glasses, but the search continues, especially for nonlinear applications.

But how do we make mid-IR light in the first place? Well, that has long been a bottle neck in mid-IR technology, but the last few years have brought some improvement and mid-IR sources can these days even be bought off the shelf. These are usually frequency combs – trains of sharp spectral lines with an equidistant frequency spacing  – often derived from quantum cascade lasers, but many of them do not cover the full mid-IR range. Compared to the adjacent near-infrared, however, the choice of sources is limited, and more advanced frequency converters like optical parametric oscillators (OPO), which are standard lab-equipment in the near-IR, are still few and far between in the longer mid-IR.

Luckily, these challenges are opportunities rather than obstacles, and although we’ll never be able to see it in a literal sense, we will for sure see a lot more (figuratively) of the mid-IR in the near future.

Near-Infrared: A fact sheet

Post by Lina Persechini

Fibre_wikipedia

What?
As you move away from the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum you encounter the Infrared region. Infrared light is divided into three spectral regions: near, mid- and far-infrared

Where?
The near-infrared (NIR) can be defined as the region between 750 nm and 2,500 nm, although the boundary between the NIR and the mid-Infrared (MIR) region can vary slightly.

When?
In the year 1800, astronomer and composer William Herschel had been using dark filters in a telescope to study the sun when he noticed that he could still feel the heat of the sun’s rays through the filters. It was through this ‘sensation of heat’ that he concluded that there must be invisible light beyond the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum.

How….can we use it?
Herschel’s discovery led to the development of astronomical spectrophotometry as a means to understand our stars and galaxies. NIR spectroscopy can also be used to understand the chemical composition of different media we have right here on Earth. However, the most significant and relevant use of NIR radiation is in fibre-optic communication, where information is carried through NIR light rather than through electric cables. The telecom window between 800 – 900 nm was originally used for transmitting information, but it turned out the optical fibre losses over longer distances were too high in this region. Later, the range 1,260 – 1,360 nm (or more affectionately known as the original ‘O’-band) was used, as the optical fibres produced in the 1970s were of the lowest loss in this region. Nowadays the C-band (1,530 nm to 1,565 nm) is the most conventionally used band for long-haul and submarine optical transmission. In total we can boast around 6 bands (O, E, S, C, L, U) which have been defined and standardized to meet our information requirements.

 

Visible spectrum: On our wavelength

Post by Mark Daly

The Earth’s Sun emits a tremendous amount of electromagnetic radiation in the Earth’s direction. Even though the entire spectrum of light is incident on this planet, why is it that we humans only see in a tiny band that we have — rather appropriately — named the visible spectrum?

world-1582347_1280

At first, we could simply dismiss the problem as being purely evolutionary, but there must have been a driving factor — some evolutionary pressure — that led us down this path. With a little thought and some ‘light’ physics, we can use the process of elimination to lead us to a logical solution.

Let’s begin with the source of all our light, the aforementioned Sun. The Sun can be described as a ‘black body’. Without getting too bogged down in the somewhat confusing name for such a bright object, let’s just say it means that the Sun is capable of emitting light continuously over the entire frequency spectrum. (More interested readers can take a look at the Wikipedia entry for more information).  Luckily, our good friend Max Planck worked out the distribution of light across the different frequencies emitted by such a black body back in the 1900s. Using Planck’s law, we can input our Sun’s temperature and discover that the peak of its emission just so happens to be in the visible spectrum. You might be forgiven for thinking ‘Ah-ha! This is why we see in this range’, and you would be partially correct. Yet we can still dig a little deeper.

Atmospheric_electromagnetic_opacity.svg

Atmospheric absorption of light from the sun. Image credit: NASA, SVG by Mysid

Not all of the light that is incident on Earth makes it down to the ground in any meaningful abundance. In fact, there are huge absorption bands in our atmosphere. The only bands of light that could be candidates for vision are ultraviolet, visible, near-infrared, and longer radio wavelengths.

Technically speaking, all of these types of light would be viable candidates for providing some information about the world around us. However, the scale of the fine details on Earth limits it further. Radio wavelengths are very long, ranging from a few millimetres to kilometres! Because of their long wavelengths they turn out to be very useful, because they aren’t absorbed much by thin obstructions. However, because of their large dimensions, if we relied on radio wavelengths to see we wouldn’t be able to make out any fine details in our surroundings, so we can rule them out.

What about the infrared spectrum? Some animals do see in the infrared, but these animals are typically cold-blooded. Why? Well, hot objects emit quite a bit of infrared radiation, so we would be all but blinded by the heat from our own bodies if we could see in this regime. Ultraviolet light contains a lot of energy – the shorter the wavelength, the higher the energy of a single photon. Although some animals do see in the UV, we humans cannot. We know that even on a seemingly cloudy day, UV radiation can damage our skin, so it’s best not to focus this powerful light onto our delicate retinas.

Ultimately, after exhausting all other options, we are left with one contender: the good old reliable visible spectrum.

Plato, superheroes and a visit to the abattoir

Post by Malte Gather, commissioned by Nina Meinzer

The original paper in Nature Communications can be read here.

2010, Boston. The 50th anniversary of the laser. A device that was originally famously proclaimed as “a solution in search of a problem” and that became the solution to so many crucial problems of modern society and science. What better way to pay tribute to the laser than to bring it quite literally to life? With this in mind, my former supervisor Andy Yun and I got to work on turning living cells into tiny lasers, using a green fluorescent protein produced by the cells themselves as optical gain medium. When our paper came out, it inspired many people in … well … unexpected ways: “Sharks with frickin’ lasers attached to their heads”, “bacterial infection that shoots lasers in your body”, “superheroes shooting laser beams from their eyes”. The first two seemed rather undesirable, let alone the red-tape involved in any study aimed at their realization. But superheroes with laser eyes? Back in ancient Greece, Plato even believed vision itself was mediated by “eye beams” that scan our environment. So could laser beams emitted from the eye have a more peaceful application than what is suggested in the comic books of modern times?

laser on a contact lens on a cows eye1

Fast forward to 2017, St Andrews, Scotland. Working with Professors Ifor Samuel and Graham Turnbull, our jointly supervised PhD student Markus Karl develops an ultra-thin organic semiconductor laser. He strips all non-essential components and ends up with a 200 nm-thick membrane that contains only gain medium and resonator; the pump is supplied externally by optical excitation. To fabricate these devices, Markus uses a carrier substrate and a sacrificial intermediate layer. In the final step of the fabrication, the membrane floats off the substrate and rises to the surface of a water bath. What now? Another solution in search of a problem?

We soon find that we can pick up the membranes with another substrate, or fish for them with a little net. Then we find that our membranes work like stickers, stickers that can turn any object into a laser. Ifor suggests to put them on banknotes as a new security feature. A membrane laser on every banknote in the United Kingdom would probably make our membrane lasers the world’s most numerous type of laser.

But what about Plato and the superheroes? Our lasers are not only among the world’s thinnest, they also have very low lasing thresholds. But how low? Say, compared to laser safety standards? It takes a bit of courage but eventually my student and I go to see the department laser safety officer to ask how their intensity – and more importantly the intensity of the optical pump – compare to permissible levels for intentional ocular exposure. In other words, could we use our membranes to shoot laser beams from one’s eyes without blinding ourselves? We check, twice, three times, four times, but the answers seems to be that it should be safe, with about a ten-fold margin before reaching maximum permissible exposure levels.

We refrained from testing our lasers on the human eye – at least for now. Instead, the last part of our study involved a trip to an abattoir near Edinburgh to buy some cow’s eyes. (Ophthalmology research often uses them as model for the human eye.) A few hours later a cow’s eyeball in a Petri dish shoots a green laser beam across our optics lab. In the future, we hope to use such lasers as an authentication and access control feature, complementing a biometric iris scan. For now, we are left with the slightly weird image of a zombie supercow shooting laser beams from its large blank eyes…

Malte Gather

Reference: Nature Commun. 9, 1525 (2018)  doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03874-w

Ultraviolet radiation: Not just for a suntan

Post by Gaia Donati

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation identifies the region of the electromagnetic spectrum where wavelengths are longer than those of X-rays. The extreme UV (XUV) range identifies light with a wavelength around 10 nm and up to 100 nm; far-UV and middle-UV regions are characterised by wavelengths between about 100 nm and 200 nm and between 200 nm and 300 nm, respectively. Near-UV radiation extends to around 400 nm, which is commonly taken as the lower value for visible wavelengths. You may wonder – why should one bother to label these intervals so diligently? While the precise boundaries of these ranges are not set in stone, the UV region peculiarly spans two different orders of magnitude in wavelength (or, equivalently, in frequency): the fastidious labels for each sub-region are there to remind us that the features and applications of light in the longer-wavelength near-UV region are distinct from those characterising short-wavelength XUV radiation, for example.UV_Photo_GD

If you check the label on your sunscreen, this will probably read “UVB protection” or “UVB and UVA protection” – and it just so happens that UVB and UVA identify wavelengths ranges which almost coincide with the middle- and near-UV regions, respectively. Of all kinds of UV light, UVB and UVA rays are the ones that penetrate the deepest into human skin – with its longer wavelength, UVA light reaches all the way into the epidermis and the dermis. Therefore, it is important to protect our skin from these rays: overexposure to UVA and UVB radiation – including tanning beds – is now known to increase the risk of developing various forms of skin cancer. On a more positive health-related note, light in the UVB region is instrumental to the activation of vitamin D in the organism, and is thus crucial for calcium absorption.

Let’s put aside the interaction of light with our human bodies and look instead at what happens when light interacts with media such as a crystal slab or a gas. Under specific conditions, it is possible to observe a variety of so-called nonlinear interactions between these states of matter and electromagnetic radiation: nonlinear frequency conversion, for instance, describes processes whereby shining light at a given wavelength through a crystal produces an output radiation at a different wavelength. An ‘extreme’ form of nonlinear frequency conversion involves the interaction between an intense, focussed laser pulse (which has a fixed temporal duration, as opposed to the continuous light beam produced by a laser pointer) and a gas, resulting in the generation of light at high multiples of the optical frequency of the original pulse: this process, known as high harmonic generation, has proven incredibly successful for obtaining short laser pulses in the XUV range. These short pulses, which have durations around and below 100 attoseconds (where an attosecond equals one quintillionth of a second), can be turned into probes for the study of physical phenomena taking place on the same temporal scale – think of a very fast camera capturing the dynamics of electrons in matter, for example. Ultraviolet? Ultrafast, too.

X-rays : a tale of bones, molecules and mummies

Post by Giulia Pacchioni

x-raysX-rays are the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum that falls between gamma rays and the ultraviolet (UV) — their wavelength is of the order 0.01−10 nanometres. What’s fascinating about them is their extremely wide range of applications, going from astronomy to art.

The history of X-rays goes back a long way: they were accidentally discovered by Wilhelm Röntgen in 1895. As it wasn’t clear what the nature of the new radiation was, Röntgen just labelled it ‘X’. The name was supposed to be temporary… but it stuck. As X-rays penetrate soft tissues but not bones, the potential for medical imaging was immediately clear, so much that X-rays were already in use during World War I. Röntgen received the Nobel Prize in Physics for this discovery − and not just a Nobel Prize, but the very first one − in 1901.

An interesting fact is that in the early days there was no suspicion that the new radiation might be harmful, and, for a while, a proper X-rays mania arose, with products advertised as ‘X-rays headache tablets’ and ‘X-rays stove polish’ (and it’s still a mystery what X-rays actually had to do with them). Until the 1950s, X-rays machines could be found in shoe stores, with the purpose of ensuring a perfect fit.

As it soon became clear, X-rays have enormous potential beyond medical imaging as means to shed light on the structure of matter: for example, X-ray crystallography unlocked the structure of DNA in 1953, which led to a Nobel Prize in 1962 (yes, another one. 15 Nobel prizes were awarded for research related to X-rays over the years). The brightest X-rays are found in synchrotron facilities, and the fun fact here is that originally X-rays were an unwanted by-product of particle accelerators developed for high-energy physics (particles moving along a curved trajectory emit radiation, and when their speed is close to that of light this radiation comes in the form of X-rays). Starting from the 1980s synchrotrons entirely dedicated to X-rays came on-line, starting a very productive era of discoveries in materials science, chemistry, biology and drug discovery. Nowadays the first X-ray free electron lasers, which offer ultrafast and very bright X-rays, make it possible to film chemical reactions and determine the structure of single biomolecules.

But the range of X-ray applications does not end here. They are used to investigate the Universe, studying black holes and dark matter, to unveil underpaintings and changes in works of art, revealing what went through an artist’s mind while working on a masterpiece. X-rays allowed us to study Egyptian mummies without unwrapping or damaging them (examples here and here), to read ancient scrolls without unrolling them (here and here), to find out that a wooden statue contained an ancient Chinese mummy… and even to see inside the remains of dinosaurs. And not to mention applications in daily life, such as in airport security.

We went a long way from the very first X-ray image — the hand of Röntgen’s wife — and in directions he would never have imagined.

Interactions: John Dudley on the International Day of Light

Post by Nina MeinzerIDL-Logo-Horizontal

Last year, UNESCO proclaimed the International Day of Light – or IDL for short – as an annual celebration of the role of light and light-based technologies in society. The first ever IDL is happening soon, on 16th May, and on your wavelength will join in the celebration with a series of light-related blog posts spread across the whole month of May.

To start our ‘month of light’, Nina Meinzer spoke to John Dudley from the Université de Franche-Comté, who is the Chair of the IDL 2018 Steering Committee, to hear more about his experience of working with UNESCO to get the IDL off the ground.

Why is it important to have an International Day of Light?

After the International Year of Light in 2015, it became clear that the task of raising awareness of the importance of light and its central place in science (and many other fields) was something that had really only just begun. Although 2015 saw over 10,000 events worldwide, we had really only scratched the surface in linking together different communities that needed to talk together. For example, events that involved politicians, scientists, industry, NGOs and students were a great success, yet they were rare. I thought that there was untapped potential to do more. Bringing communities together is the only way that we can solve pressing humanitarian concerns – whether it is the lack of safe light that reduces educational opportunity for children, or the lack of access to simple optical technologies such as eyeglasses that reduces the quality of life. An International Day of Light now gives us an annual focal point to raise these problems amongst the different sectors that – by working together – can solve them.Dudley

Moreover, the world has changed a lot since the idea of the International Year of Light was first mooted in 2009. The whole notion of science as an arbiter of truth is under threat, and the negative consequences of bad science and the inability to distinguish fact from fiction are becoming evident in all spheres of society. Promoting science and the scientific method via an annual International Day provides us with the chance to do something about this directly. We all complain about the direction the world is taking – well, here is our chance to do something concrete about it through education.

The 16th May was chosen to celebrate the first operational laser. Why is the laser so significant?

Lasers have had a truly revolutionary effect on society. This sounds like a cliché I know, but it’s hard to think of a comparable technology in optics that has had a similar influence in so many different fields. Lasers underpin communications and the internet, are used in manufacturing, navigation, medicine and many, many other applications. They also kicked-off digital entertainment with CDs and DVDs – there is actually an interesting paradox here that most people don’t appreciate: for many years when CDs were the dominant way to listen to music, one of the most important markets for lasers was actually an audio product!

And for me personally, the story of the laser illustrates a much more powerful lesson. You can’t put it better than Charles Townes did. It’s a long quote, but this is one that cannot be repeated too often:  “As a striking example of how important technology applied to human interests can grow out of basic university research, the laser’s development fits a general pattern. As is often the case, it was a pattern which could not possibly have been planned in advance. What research planner, wanting a more intense light, would have started by studying molecules with microwaves? What industrialist, looking for new cutting and welding devices, or what doctor, wanting a new surgical tool as the laser has turned out to be, would have urged the study of microwave spectroscopy? The whole field of quantum electronics is almost a textbook example of broadly applicable technology growing unexpectedly out of basic research.”

How did you get involved with the proposal for the IDL? And what is it like to work with UNESCO?

I coordinated the International Year of Light in 2015, and during a progress meeting in June 2015, we discussed how to continue the gains already made, and UNESCO mentioned to us that they may support an annual follow-up in the form of an International Day. The problem of course is getting such an initiative on the political agenda of an inter-governmental organisation such as UNESCO. And to this end, we needed to persuade a number of its member states to place the International Day of Light formally before UNESCO governance. We were greatly helped by local scientists who made contact with their own academies and ministries, but it still took two years of work, with many meetings and discussions and drafts and modifications. Even in the final plenary session in November 2017 when the IDL was being proclaimed, there were still proposals being made from the floor to change the date!  But in the end, they decided to stick with the initial proposal of 16th  May which as I said above, I think is an excellent choice.

How can the IDL help researchers to engage with the general public?

Light is a great theme for outreach. The youngest are attracted to the many visual aspects of light, colour and shadows, and adults are interested in the underlying science and the career opportunities for their children. Clear answers to everyday questions about the colour of leaves, the sky, clouds and rainbows never fail to interest people, and they then open up many interesting avenues to talk about the latest results in optics and photonics and the impact they have on society.

It is also possible to attract many more people to an event if we combine science outreach with some entertainment or cultural performance that uses light – and there are many exciting advances in how that light is being used in this way, from dynamic projection to light painting. Importantly, the theme of light also allows us to raise awareness of what we can see when the lights are turned off, and the need to reduce unwanted light pollution so that we can appreciate the stars in the night sky, as well as save energy.

What are you working on in your own group and what do you hope will be the impact of you research?

My research spans a few fields: nonlinear fibre optics, ultrafast optics and nonlinear science in general. Right now I am working on applying real-time measurement techniques to get new insights into the nonlinear dynamics of supercontinuum generation in fibres and fibre laser sources. Both supercontinuum and fibre laser sources can show both highly stable and highly unstable regimes of operation, and I am hopeful that by better understanding the instabilities, we can create better and more stable sources for applications (in many areas – from material processing to spectroscopy to imaging).

What made you want to be a physicist? Why did you choose to specialise in optics?

I always loved science growing up, and no doubt terrified my family doing many dangerous experiments with chemistry and electricity at home. I read science fiction, watched the original Thunderbirds, saw the original Star Wars in the cinema on its first release, and was incredibly inspired by the writings of Carl Sagan. I suppose it was natural I ended up doing physics at university, although I was initially planning to specialize in nuclear science. But when it came to choosing a research project, I was really impressed with a new activity that had just started using picosecond lasers to study molecular dynamics, in what we would now call the field of biophotonics. In the end, I found that the laser operation itself was raising some extremely interesting questions, and so that ended up being my PhD. That said, it was only when I started teaching optics as a lecturer that I really discovered the field in general, its beauty and its possibility to be used as a key to unlock students’ interest in many other areas.

If you weren’t a physicist, what would you like to be – and why?

A historian. It would allow me to justify buying expensive old books and learning about other times and cultures and the rise and fall of different societies. I’d like to think though that I’d be involved in bringing more tools of science into the field to remove as much speculation as possible.

Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with — and why?

Of course there are many famous physicists to choose from, but I’m going to go a little off the beaten track and choose Edmund Halley. I suppose I should say that I’d like to have dinner with Isaac Newton instead, but I’m not sure Newton would be much fun. On the other hand, Halley knew Newton well (and would certainly have tales to tell) and yet Halley also had his own fair share of major discoveries. He also had some interesting controversies – for example, he got into trouble at one point for suggesting that the story of Noah’s flood might be an account of a cometary impact. And even the account of his death suggests he was a very interesting chap: he was 85 years old and sitting in a chair, when the story goes that he felt he was finally passing away; but he made sure to pour himself a glass of wine (and drink it) before he did. I think he would be excellent company.