Bridging science and real world impact with confidence

What does it take for someone in science to make a difference in the world? We often seek success and validation through the rigour of our research and studies, but the key may be in our attitude.

Naturejobs career expo journalism competition winner Diane N.H. Kim

Confidence is not something we normally associate with science. In this field, grounded in facts and far from emotions, it’s no wonder we have trouble seeing how our attitudes affect our success. A confident attitude is considered much more important for an actress on the red carpet, or a politician delivering a speech. Scientists are still largely portrayed and perceived as solitary individuals with passive personalities, spurred by a media portrayal of a lone scientist in their basement lab.DK_profilepicture Continue reading

Peanut allergy therapy produces epigenetic changes in immune cells

Earlier this week, news that six months of exposure therapy to peanuts enabled almost 100 children with an allergy to this food to eat the equivalent of ten peanuts stirred a lot of optimism. It was just one of many studies showing that some patients with severe peanut allergies can actually gain the ability to consume small amounts of the food by eating a little bit of this nut each day, gradually increasing the dose over several months.

Scientists may now have a better handle on how this ability to shrug off peanut allergy forms, and why some individuals respond to the treatment while others do not. A study published today in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology reports that the immune cells of some patients with peanut allergies who became tolerant to peanuts after exposure therapy showed DNA modifications thought to perhaps have a role in defending against allergies. “By understanding what changes occur,” says lead author Kari Nadeau, an immunologist at the Stanford School of Medicine in California, “we can identify targets for new therapy and biomarkers by which we can decide whether or not to keep treating a patient.”

Continue reading

Cancer vaccine pioneer: the day I do not take it personally is the day I leave science

Harnessing the body’s own immune system should lead to less toxic cancer treatments, says a pioneer in the field of immuno-oncology

 

Dr Helen Sabzevari

Dr Helen Sabzevari

Dr Helen Sabzevari is Senior Vice President of Immuno-Oncology  at pharmaceutical company EMD-Serono. Sabzevari majored in immunology and immunobiology before going on to do a PhD in immunology, during which she became fascinated by the idea of activating the immune system against cancer. As a result, she went on to do her first postdoc in the fledgling field of cancer immunotherapy. Here she talks to Naturejobs about this growing field of research, and how immunotherapy is changing the treatments on offer for cancer patients.

What is cancer immunotherapy?

In one sense it is looking at how our immune system succumbs to the cancer in the first place, and that makes sense from the perspective that with cancer, the immune system is dealing with its own cells so it’s logical that it would not attack itself. But on the other hand it is fascinating to see how we might train the immune system to recognise cancer cells. For me this is really the dogma I want to address – that on one hand we need the immune system to recognise the serlf versus the non-self, but on the other hand, with cancer, we have to come up with ways to get our immune system to become aware of something that is wrong internally.

After your first postdoc, you switched fields for a while. Why?

It was very clear to me was at that point that in the field if immunology there was a disconnect between cancer immunotherapy on the one hand, and basic immunology and auto-immunity research on the other. Usually these two diseases are opposite sides of a coin – what leads to auto-immunity is over activation of the immune cells, whereas with cancer there is a quiescence of the immune system. My feeling was that it was very important to understand both sides, so I did a senior postdoc in the field of autoimmunity. At the time, some of my mentors did not consider that the best move because I had gained publications and focus in the field of immunotherapy. From my perspective it was completely the opposite – I wanted a holistic view of immunology, in order to come up with more innovative approaches for the immunotherapy of cancer.

During your career have you seen a shift in the way people are looking at treating cancer?

Absolutely. In the past two or three decades the treatment of cancer has been really focussed on radiation and chemotherapy. But the biggest issue there is the toxicity of these treatments. The whole concept of using immunotherapy is to understand how to activate the immune system, which is your own self defence mechanism, and come up with much more innovative therapies that can first lead to the stabilisation of the disease, and eventually work towards a curative aim. This has allowed us to think about approaches that are less toxic, and by reducing the toxicity, patients can maintain the treatment for longer periods of time with a much better quality of life.

What kinds of people are suited to a career in immunotherapy?

It’s unique, in that we need individuals with a good understanding of cancer biology and also a very solid understanding and training in immunology – they can connect this, see the bigger picture, and apply it. Continue reading