The ‘Leverage’ Start-Up Model

Leverage Startup2.png

Entrepreneurial professors, recent graduates, or students in the life sciences who would like to translate their research into a biotech start-up have the potential to de-risk nascent technology and provide the foundation for a company by using a capital-efficient, non-dilutive operating model we term the “leverage” start-up. This model was developed in response to an economic climate in which early-stage investment capital for biotech is scarce and prohibitively expensive. By leverage of existing infrastructure and resources in universities and other organizations, and by judicious use of non-dilutive financing, an entrepreneur with a laptop and access to some lab space can incubate early-stage academic discoveries, develop proof of concept, generate value and establish a biotech start-up.

Biotech represents an expensive, high risk, long-term investment. Translating a discovery in a research lab to a new medicine approved for human use requires extensive research and development infrastructure, expertise and resources at an estimated average cost of $1.5 billion, and a product development cycle in the decades. Compare this with information technology, where the ability to create, test and develop a start-up has never been easier. A company can literally be funded on a credit card and new business concepts can be rapidly tested and iterated. A significant driver of this advancement has been a reduction of costs for technical infrastructure and an increased ability to rapidly test ideas in the marketplace. The convergence of these advantages has created tremendous innovation and investment in information technology companies over the past few years. In contrast, it remains exceedingly difficult to bring nascent academic biotech research to a stage attractive to investors. The Burrill & Company 2011 Annual Report on the Life Sciences Industry noted that “the funding woes biotechs face…represent[s] a structural change to the finance landscape for the life sciences.” The Leverage Start-up model represents a response to this change in the finance landscape for early-stage technologies.

The Leverage Start-up – a new model for building biotechs

The Leverage Start-up model (image at top of post) is a vehicle for developing technology through its earliest and riskiest stage. We believe that this model is repeatable and scalable because the Leverage Start-up:

  • Leverages R&D infrastructure, such as specialized facilities and equipment that exists in academic organizations, thereby minimizing the cost of establishing and equipping research facilities. This accelerates the R&D and product development program of the start-up
  • Leverages technical expertise from world-class academic institutions, building collaborations and obtaining insight into your proposed solution from recognized opinion leaders. These contacts serve as an (in)formal Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) ;
  • Leverages resources that support the commercialization of academic innovation, such as technology transfer offices, incubator organizations and industry support organizations. This access to business intelligence supports activities such as patent filing and business strategy ; and
  • Leverages non-dilutive funding from public, charitable and private sources to finance R&D programs to de-risk technology and generate value. This financing fills the gap left by shrinking investment dollars available to early-stage biotech start-ups and provides funding to help de-risk early venture concepts.

The “leverage” start-up is a mechanism to generate proof-of-concept data for promising early-stage academic discoveries in the life sciences. It is designed to advance technologies in a biotech start-up to the stage where investors would contemplate an investment, and the cost of that investment to the founders was not prohibitive. In future posts we will discuss each of the four components of the “leverage” start-up model in more detail.

Have you used a similar approach to launch a biotech start-up? Or do you believe that this model would work in your academic environment? We would love to hear your input. Please leave comments below.

James Taylor and Euan Ramsey

Russia-India Biotech Network

RIBN1.jpg

In order to improve and encourage bilateral trade between India and Russia, the two countries have signed the Russia-India Biotech Network (RIBN) agreement to enhance collaboration in the biotechnology sector. The RIBN is jointly developed by the Federation of Asian Biotech Associations (FABA) and Russian Biotech Association. This development holds immense significance for Indian small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the biotech sectors, which are likely to be encouraged by these developments to partner with Russian biotech companies for further business expansion. RIBN will be a dedicated online platform to effectively facilitate collaboration between the Russian and Indian biotech communities.

This exclusive online platform is the first-of-its-kind, and might prove to be a useful tool to accelerate the cross-border collaboration between India and Russia. RIBN will act as a dynamic platform to bring together the biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientists, university students of Russian and Indian biotech communities, in both science and business. Later, other countries could join this platform, making it the first global professional networking system. The interested companies would be able to browse through the profile of their counterparts, and interact with them to understand their activities in detail and vice versa. Thus, RIBN is intended to facilitate business partnering throughout the year, in addition to offering business support services like databases, online seminars, placements, exchange programs, facility visits, and trade delegations.

The concept was mooted during BioAsia-2010 conference held in Hyderabad this year. The first phase of the platform would be functional by October and become fully operational during BioAsia 2011.

Objectives of RIBN:

1. The RIBN is likely to facilitate business partnering between India and Russia through database support, online seminars, placements, exchange programmes and facility visits, among other services.

2. This collaboration is intended to provide the right environment, infrastructure and encouragement to leading biotech companies to establish their units in the Genome Valley, Biotech Park.

3. RIBN should allow Indian SMEs in the biotech sector to explore business opportunities in Russia because trade barriers in this sector are likely to decrease through the agreement.

4. To support mutual efforts and collaborations in joint research and product development, with special focus on agricultural biotechnology, pharmaceuticals and vaccines.

Viren Konde

Brazil’s laws

Biotechnology development in Brazil is moving, but slowly, due to the lack of (1) investments from the private sector and (2) a clear and consistent exercise of the Brazilian patent law (9279/96). In this commentary we will deal with the first issue and in the next with the patent context.

Science in Brazil has progressed considerably in the last couple of decades. Science output in Brazil was multiplied by five since 1980 and Brazil contributes close to 3% to the world scientific output.

blue green.bmp

Figure 1 – Brazilian scientific output with respect to the world (indexed by Thomson/ISI), and to Latin America from 1981-2008. In green: Brazilian output with respect to the world. In blue: Brazilian output with respect to Latin America.

When we compare the public investment made in Brazil to the same public investments made by developed countries the numbers are similar. However private investments are far from what one can see in the same developed countries. For this reason, combined Brazil invests slightly above 1.0% of its GNP in science and technology.

blue yellow.bmp

Figure 2 – Public and private investments in science and technology by country as % of the GDP. Public (yellow) Private (blue)

Brazil established recently two laws to stimulate private investments. The Innovation Law, December 2, 2004, and the Good Law, November 21, 2005. The last one was complemented by a Decree, on June 7, 2006, which in chapter III Articles 17 to 26 states that those entrepreneurs active in technological research and innovation can automatically deduct this investment from the income tax. In summary the government renounces to receive the tax as long as the money is invested in technological development and innovation. Both laws are recent and the results, although moving up, are still modest. In 2006 private companies invested 0.09% of the GNP.

In 2008 these investments climbed to 0.3 % of the GNP. The number of private companies in 2006 was 131 and the fiscal incentive US$1.4 billion. In 2009, 635 companies deducted from their fiscal taxes US$5 billion.

There are flaws: entrepreneurs complain that calculations are complicated (services are now available to help) and they fear that when they submit their deduction proposal the financial system will contest what they presented as technological development or innovation. Another flaw is that the laws do not benefit nascent and small companies – in other words, companies typical of the biotech sector. For this reason few biotech companies (particularly in the area of health) are benefited. Risk capital to move up small companies is still a problem in the biotech sector. Brazil has supported these small companies through another mechanism (I’ll discuss it later). The system helps these companies but they hardly are funded to scale up their business.

Luiz Antonio Barreto de Castro