Researcher mobility in a post-Brexit world

flag-of-the-united-kingdom-smaller

Existing UK immigration rules can support foreign-born researcher movement after Brexit, but the attractiveness of the UK research environment may still keep the best and brightest away, says Erica Brockmeier

Whether you’re relocating around the block, across town, or to a completely new city, moving is not a trivial task. For many PhD students and early career researchers, moving to a new research group can play a key role in professional development. It’s a way to gain new perspectives for your research, expand your professional network, and to work in a prestigious or well-known group in your field. Sometimes the best move for your career isn’t just across towns or cities, but is one that involves moving away from your home country, either temporarily or permanently.

Continue reading

Being a foreign scientist in Trump’s America

How is the Trump administration affecting foreign scientists working in the US?

A Spanish bioscience postdoc on a non-immigrant J1 visa, based in California, who wishes to remain anonymous, shares her perspective as a foreigner in the US in the current political climate with science writer Louisa Cockbill.

We’re now three months into Trump’s presidency.  What effect has it had on you?

On election night I was very disappointed and upset. It was frustrating not to have the right to vote as the political decisions made in this country affect my life. The uncertainty of what happens now is kind of scary. In general I still feel welcomed and still love living here. However, as an immigrant, a woman and a scientist it’s not surprising that I’m a little worried – these aren’t positions that seem to be supported by the administration. I check nearly every day to see if they have decided to change something with my visa or green card applications that may affect me personally.

The inauguration of President Trump

Continue reading

Securing workplace rights for scientists in the age of Trump

Unions could be the best way to protect scientific jobs in uncertain times, says union president Anke Schennink.

In the wake of Donald Trump’s election, the scientific community is on edge. The future of federal science funding remains unclear, campus inclusivity is under threat, immigration policy is in disarray, and entire academic fields – such as climate change research – fear the worst.

2017-03-24 SF Barg Action pic

UC Postdocs in solidarity at UCSF on a day of bargaining.

Continue reading

Travel ban update: One week later

Elizabeth Goss updates us on recent developments with the US immigration ban

In the week following the US administration’s executive order on immigration, which included a travel ban for individuals from seven designated countries, we saw a flurry of activity and responses.

US_passport_extra_pages Continue reading

Ancient migrants left Africa with a ‘mutational load’

The populations that broke off from early out-of-Africa migrants may have progressively accumulated harmful genetic mutations, suggests a new study published this month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Modern humans, originating in Africa, started migrating out of the homeland towards Asia and the Americas around 50,000 years ago. Theoretical models predict that the expansion out of Africa might have happened through small bands that started expanding into multiple continents.

Population genetics theory says that each population breaking off from these small bands carried a mutational load.

Scientists in this study say that not only did the migrations leave a mark on the genetic diversity of different populations, but they also gave way to classes of harmful alleles that have different patterns across said populations. The farther away from Africa (in other words, the greater the distance covered away from the homeland), the more harmful the mutations or genetic variants are.

To test their hypothesis, the team of scientists sequenced the full genomes and high-coverage exomes from seven geographically divergent human populations from Namibia, Congo, Algeria, Pakistan, Cambodia, Siberia, and Mexico.

The next-generation sequencing technology they used confirmed that the mutations under scrutiny evolved with the migrations, and revealed that the degree of the harm is directly proportional to the distance traveled away from Africa.

“To be able to see this, you need a huge amount of data in many populations from different continents. Only 5 years ago, this would not have been possible,” says study co-author Laurent Excoffier, in comments to Science Daily.