Uncertain Airspace: Changing career paths is disorienting and exhilarating

Pursuing a new career makes PhD student Jonathan Wosen feel like a baby goose—and he loves it.

Sometimes I ask people, “if you weren’t studying biology, what would you do?”

At first, they’re taken aback, and I don’t blame them. PhD students are self-selected for a certain kind of persistent, focused thinking; that’s what it takes to become the world’s leading expert on your thesis project. We are as deeply immersed in our work as a fish in water. That makes asking a graduate student to consider a different field of study a lot like asking a fish to imagine life on dry land.

Clownfish_in_blue_water-smaller

“We are as deeply immersed in our work as a fish in water. That makes asking a graduate student to consider a different field of study a lot like asking a fish to imagine life on dry land.”

Continue reading

Getting the message out

How do you engage people with your science?

So you’re all over Twitter and Facebook and you even have a blog. Good on you – you’re your own public-relations and outreach specialist, getting the word out about your science. But what about the other kind of outreach – what’s still called science communication? Can you talk with a member of the press for an interview, or deliver your message to key thought leaders – such as government officials who decide on funding agencies’ annual budgets? Is it just a bit scarier than tweeting?

Continue reading

Scientific communities: How to get your blog noticed

Increasing engagement and using social media can help get your blog posts to wider audiences, says Jon Tennant.

At the 2015 London Naturejobs Career Expo, Scientific communities panelist Jon Tennant, an avid science blogger, shared a few top tips on getting your blog noticed.

Top tips from Jon Tennant:

  1. Tag your posts so that they are easily searchable.
  2. Share your posts on social media (Google+, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter…).
  3. Ask for feedback by getting people to comment on your posts. This can stimulate conversations around the topics covered, which will increase engagement.
  4. Ask people to share your content in their own circles so that it reaches a broader audience.

Further reading:

Scientific communities: Build your own.

Scientific communities: How to follow the right people on Twitter

Scientific communities: From Twitter to paper

Scientific communities: Membership at learned societies

Scientific communities: Build your own

Learned societies and online platforms can be great ways to develop a mutually beneficial network, say panellists at the 2015 Naturejobs Career Expo in London.

Guest contributor Paul Brack

Jon-Tennant-NJCE15-communities-naturejobs-blog

Jon Tennant and the merits of online scientific communities {credit}Image credit: Julie Gould{/credit}

“Networking isn’t just me trying to get something from you,” said Julie Gould, editor of Naturejobs, as she opened the session on Building Scientific Communities at the 2015 London Naturejobs Careers Expo. “Networking is about building a relationship with another person that will benefit both of you.” The two invited speakers in this session, Sarah Blackford, head of Education & Public Affairs at the Society for Experimental Biology, and Jon Tennant, an Imperial College London PhD student, discussed some methods that early career scientists can use to start these types of relationships.

Learned societies

Learned societies, such as the Royal Society of Chemistry or the Biochemical Society, are, according to Blackford, “clubs for people with a similar interest in an academic discipline.” Early-career scientists often underestimate how useful learned societies can be in helping them advance their careers. Blackford pointed out that learned societies have quite a lot of money, and, as they’re not-for-profit, “they give that money back into the scientific community.” Learned societies do this partly by organising and subsidising events, such as conferences on topics that interest their members and giving travel grants to early-career scientists to enable them to attend external meetings. Continue reading

Coping in the era of cyber-Darwinism

Contributor Simon Peyda

simon peyda

{credit}Credit: Elina Peyda{/credit}

The World Wide Web celebrated a quarter of a century this year. I am old enough to have witnessed the advent of internet and yet vividly remember 8-bit video games, floppy disks, VHS and cassette tapes. They are memories that those born into the social network and smartphone-centred world of today will not share. As a biomedical alumnus, I believe in Charles Darwin’s “Survival of the fittest” theory. Thus I have wondered; how does my generation survive in a labour market when competing with emerging information technological natives?

In a previous NatureJobs entry, Digital tattoos, Shimi Rii made a crucial observation how “we suffer from a lack of web presence”.  “We”, I assume, excludes the youngest generation.  Thus, we must up our IT skills to avoid extinction. In addition, Get Social… for selfish reasons! hit the nail on the head. I have a real life example of this that I wanted to share.

As an experiment, I documented the journey through my studies at Karolinska Institute’s Master degree programme in Biomedicine all the way to graduation day. It began in March two years ago when I submitted my application papers. At the time, I had questions that could be boiled down to “What is the Karolinska experience like?” If I had uncertainties, as a native student, surely there would be others and even international applicants wondering what awaited them, too? I set out an aim to connect curriculum with actual experience through daily blogging. Continue reading

OpenSciLogs – A Glimpse of the Future of Science Blogging

Original OpenSciLogs artwork by Lindsay Cade, @CadeParade on Twitter.

Original OpenSciLogs artwork by Lindsay Cade, @CadeParade on Twitter.

Guest blog post by Paige Brown, SciLogs.com blogging manager and Ph.D. student in the Manship School of Mass Communication, Louisiana State University.

The SciLogs blogging network is committed to transparent science storytelling that provides us with new knowledge about the world and ourselves. Today, we’re introducing a new experimental concept to SciLogs – OpenSciLogs, or “open notebook” science blogging that lives beyond the individual blog and the individual blogger.

As we write this, science blogs and other new digital and social media platforms for science writing are exploding while in-depth traditional media coverage of science, especially investigative science journalism, suffers. Unfortunately, many science bloggers and science writers for new digital media outlets go unpaid or underpaid. How can we support high quality science reporting “from the ground up,” in a way that prompts scientists and science writers in digital and social media environments – including the science blogosphere – to participate collectively in creating more in-depth science journalism across the web?

With OpenSciLogs, SciLogs.com blogging manager Paige Brown (@FromTheLabBench) and the SciLogs’ blogging community are taking a stab at answering this question. Each month (or so), an OpenSciLogs story project, led by a selected SciLogs.com blogger, will be introduced here and on the crowd-funding site Indiegogo. If and once funded, the selected blogger will lead his or her OpenSciLogs story project with open participation from other science writers and readers, with regular blog updates, social media conversations, and most importantly a public and editable Google Doc. Each story project will be a living, breathing investigation into an important topic in science or science communication, published under a Creative Commons license.

Continue reading

Scientists and journalists need different things from science – Response 3: Science blogging in the New Zealand media

Grant Jacobs, Ph.D., is an established computational biologist contracting to research groups, organisations and companies offering his background in molecular biology / genetics and computer science locally and internationally through his consultancy, BioinfoTools. He has wide personal research interests, including epigenetic and chromatin-level control of gene expression, the three-dimensional organisation of genomes, structural biology and development of new algorithms. Outside of work he is a fan of travel, tramping (hiking), good books and, more recently, writing. He is the author of Code for life and tweets under @BioinfoTools.

During a recent Royal Institution debate (written up here by the nature.com Communities team), Fiona Fox, head of the UK Science Media Centre (SMC), was quoted as stating that “blogs [are] fantastic but no journalists go to them to look for full stories.”

This has not been the experience of those writing at the Sciblogs, New Zealand ’s largest on-line science writing collective. One element to this may be that the New Zealand SMC not only links journalists with scientists, and vice versa, but also promotes to the media the scientists’ causes as presented through articles on blogs. It likely helps that the NZ SMC runs Sciblogs and are in touch with the writers there daily. The SMC imprimatur may give journalists more confidence to use this source for material. An additional factor may be thatNew Zealand lacks science columnists for print and television (a notable exception is Radio NewZealand who have a long-running regular science feature). As a consequence of these factors, it may be that the media are turning to those scientists who make a direct effort to address a general audience.

Peter Griffin, who heads the NZ SMC, reports that he regularly receives requests based on material initially seen on Sciblogs. Where some articles result from interaction facilitated through the NZ SMC, others arise from direct contact between the media and the scientist. In some cases blog articles are re-worked to be run as columns in local newspapers.

Scientists writing blogs at Sciblogs have been called up to radio and television appearances, quoted in newspaper articles, or had their work presented as articles in newspapers. In addition, the NZ Herald opts-in to present blogs on their website, usually opinion pieces or backgrounders to current issues (see Appendix at the end of the article for specific examples).

Below the work of a few writers are presented as representative of the relationship between science blogging and the media inNew Zealand. These examples span three broad areas:

i) Public health issues, such as disease outbreaks and prevention

ii) Science education issues and evaluating risk

iii) Science of topical public concern e.g. the recent earthquakes

It is worth bearing in mind that a wider range of articles (and authors) have been associated with the media than the examples presented here, for example covering technology, climate change science and policy, and so forth – a limitation of the brief coverage here.

Public health issues

Microbiologist Siouxsie Wiles has found herself on radio, in newspapers and television:

– An article on using bees to diagnose tuberculosis (TB) led to an interview on Breakfast with Spanky (RDU 98.5 fm, 31st October 2011) as did an article on ’ferret’ flu (9th February 2012), which also featured on ABC Radio Australia (Connect Asia, 22nd December 2011) and was quoted in various Australian print media (The Australian, Sydney Morning Herald and the HeraldSun).

– Tilting against ’quantum-homeopathic-biophotonic flea-control pendants’ was quoted in Sunday Star Times (Charles Anderson, 22nd Jan 2012) in Scientist gets hot under the collar over flea remedy.

– An article on HPV vaccination was reworked as an op-ed piece for The Dominion Post (Offering HPV vaccination to boys the logical, ethical thing to do, 15 Dec 2011) via an university communication team member inviting her to rewrite the piece.

– The German E. coli outbreak of June last year found Siouxsie on current affairs television (TVNZ Close Up, 3rd June 2011) and radio (Radio Live Drive Time, 3rd June 2011) explaining the story to the public.

Science education issues

– Alison Campbell, whose interests lie with how science is taught, has been on radio, with several of articles from her blog re-worked for newspapers and periodicals. (Changing the culture of science education. New Zealand Herald. 27 January 2011; Predicting earthquakes: hedging your bets – National Business Review, 04 March 2011; Resistance to science. Skeptical Intelligencer. 14: 26-27 (2011); Oxygenated food for the brain Skeptical Intelligencer 13: 23-24 (2010).)

– Michael Edmond, a chemist, has taken part in a panel on radio covering the chemistry of food, sex and ageing. He feels that the presence of the blog made it clear that he was interested in science communication, which led to the opportunity.

Science of topical concern

– Our coverage of the disasters in New Zealandhas been cited in a number of articles, for example in the NZ Herald.

– One of the better-known cases is David Winter’s post examining the statistical meaningfulness of astrologer Ken Ring’s ’forecasts’ of further earthquakes in the Canterbury region following the damaging earthquakes there. Mr Ring’s ’forecasts’ raised considerable pubic debate and concern. David’s article led to an appearance in a prime-time current affairs presentation to relay the gist of his article to a wider audience; his articles was quoted and referred to in prominent print media inNew Zealand.

Colleagues have noted that they are typically introduced as scientists in these presentations, particularly when on radio or television, and the blog is not mentioned. However, it is clear that it was the blog article that led to their media invitations.

With this (and much more) evidence of the interaction of mainstream media with science blogs, perhaps there is a case for science media centres elsewhere to be more active in promoting the role of science bloggers and it should be more widely recognised that, given the opportunity, scientists who regularly address the general public have a lot to offer to improve public engagement with, and understanding of, scientific news.

Less evidenced is a perceived shift by some media venues and publications towards more science coverage. There may be no ready way to quantitate this, but one would hope that in part this is a consequence of exposure of science writing withinNew Zealand. The author’s impression has been that blog articles can act as leads to science-related stories in an indirect fashion. Finally, it’s worth noting that the traditional focus on journalists as the sole source of public information has changed. People can now access information ’straight from the source’ or via (perceived) informed comments on social media sites and blogs.

Footnote: I would like to thank my science blogging colleagues for their contribution to this article and extend my sincere apologies to any of you that have not been mentioned. With so many of you and so many articles that have made it to the media, it has been difficult to represent them all. My thanks, too, to Lou Woodley for constructive suggestions that have improved this article.

Appendix: Examples of coverage in the NZ Herald website

As mentioned, the New Zealand Herald ops-in some articles on sciblogs to their Science/Technology pages. In the previous Appendix, the topics of the examples reflect the writers’ interests.

(Search ’sciblogs’ at the NZ Herald website for other examples).

Blogging at meetings

Social media are rapidly becoming a part of scientific meetings. It is no longer unusual to tweet from meetings and summary reports of talks can often be found on blogs.

Many meeting organizers support bloggers and microbloggers. To give only a few examples: the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology’s (FASEB) upcoming meeting on Experimental Biology is supportive of scientist bloggers discussing the meeting content online. For the past few years the International conference on intelligent systems for molecular biology (ISMB) has linked FriendFeed discussions about every talk to the meeting’s homepage, assuring that these exchanges are archived and easily accessible.

Organizers at the recent Keystone meeting on Stem Cells, Cancer and Metastasis provided a Twitter hashtag to initiate dialog between meeting participants and discuss questions raised at the meeting. Similarly, at the Workshop on visualizing biological data in March, tweeting was encouraged and eagerly embraced by attendees.

At this year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology meeting one speaker underscored his support of social media by wearing a T-shirt displaying “Tweet me” in large print. While we do not suggest such a dress code be made mandatory, we do, in principle, support the spirit behind the openness, as long as reasonable and clearly communicated restrictions by presenters are honored, as discussed in the editorial in our April issue.

Given that social media are still rapidly evolving the scientific community needs to keep up a dialog as to how to best use them. We are keen to hear about our readers’ experiences with meeting blogs and tweets.