Shooting safety

dr oz.jpg
Hey doc, who wears the pants?
65 million people worldwide have lined up for swine flu shots so far—and the data indicate that the vaccine is largely safe, according to numbers released last week from the World Health Organization and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Researchers have been particularly watchful for signs of Guillian-Barre syndrome (GBS), a disease that afflicted approximately 1 out of every 100,000 people in the US who received vaccines for the 1976 Swine flu (the flu that never materialized.) A report from the Washington Post this weekend examines what researchers know (not much) about the trigger for the condition, which most often arises after infection with Campylobacter jejuni, a bacterium that causes food-borne illness.

In any vaccination campaign, some people will die or experience severe illness after vaccination; much of this will be coincidence. So the job of health agencies is to figure out if there is a consistent issue with safety. In the US, vaccine safety is monitored in part through, the ‘vaccine adverse event reporting system,’ which collects reports of potential reactions to vaccines from patients and doctors.

So far, ten cases of GBS have been reported in people who got the swine flu shot, according to the CDC; that number is in line with normal background rates for the illness, suggesting that vaccination is not causing a spike in GBS. The CDC says they saw no common underlying pattern in the other events reported, also consistent with their being due to chance. The WHO reports similar findings.

So, is that enough for Mehmet Oz, who bills himself as “America’s Doctor” to vaccinate his kids? In a recent interview the Oprah regular said his kids were not getting swine flu shots because at home he is “Mr. Oz, not Dr. Oz.” At least his website, although dated, seems fairly run-of-the-mill; no anti-vaccine screeds from Mrs. Oz.

image:: David Berkowitz, Wikimedia Commons https://bit.ly/5Z7Ro1

The Daily Dose

Pig.jpg

— GlaxoSmithKline has announced that beginning next spring it will make drugs cheaper in emerging economies. “My preference is not a high price and 100 units of profit for 100 patients, but to drop the price and make 100 of profit from 500 patients,” Abbas Hussain, head of emerging markets at company was quoted as saying. Score one for common sense. (FT)

— Now that the travel ban for visitors to the US with HIV has been lifted (a shocking 22 years after it was instated!), the International AIDS Society is all geared up to bring its biennial conference to Washington, DC. The location will help put HIV/AIDS high on the US agenda for many reasons, not least of which because it will take place in an election year. (IAS)

— Whenever a new drug is released, there’s always plenty of attention paid to whether it’s safe for pregnant women. But more attention needs to be given to reducing known risks: Women—presumably unaware of the side effects—are taking drugs known to cause birth defects when they become pregnant. (Reuters)

— Pigs have a penchant for wallowing in the mud, and it seems to serve them well. Those that get dirty living outdoors have healthier gut flora than their counterparts who live in isolation. The study comparing these pigs also found a link between dwelling in the dirt and reduced signaling of genes involved in inflammation. (Nature News)

Image: Flickr/TwoShortPlanks via Creative Commons

New guidelines for HIV drugs

800px-VariousPills.jpgThe World Health Organisation (WHO) today is changing its tune on HIV drugs, asking that antiretroviral meds be handed out sooner and that HIV-positive women continue to breastfeed as long as they or their babies are on the drugs.

On the eve of World AIDS Day (1 December), the WHO also urged countries to ditch the widely used drug, Stavudine, or d4T, because it can cause long-term, irreversible side-effects such as numbness of limbs or loss of body fat. The agency recommended that countries phase in equally effective but less toxic alternatives, such as Zidovudine or Tenofovir.

“These new recommendations are based on the most up to date, available data,” said Hiroki Nakatani, WHO’s assistant director general for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and neglected tropical diseases, in a statement. “Their widespread adoption will enable many more people in high-burden areas to live longer and healthier lives.”

The WHO increased the suggested minimum T-cell threshold at which patients should start antiretroviral therapy — from 200 CD4 cells/mm3 up to 350 cells/mm3 — and recommended that drugs should be provided to HIV-positive expectant mothers earlier in their pregnancy to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV. For the first time, the WHO also encouraged new mothers carrying the virus to continue breastfeeding for up to a year, provided that the mothers or babies are taking antiretrovirals.

The arguments in favor of starting HIV therapy earlier are outlined in the August 2009 issue of Nature Medicine.

Around 33.4 million people are now living with HIV/AIDS, according to a report released last week, but fewer people are dying from the virus owing to the increasing prevalence of life-saving meds.

Image: Wikimedia

Hatching a plan for cell-based flu jabs

FluVaccination.JPGNovartis cut the ribbon on its first US flu vaccine plant yesterday. The bioreactors are still empty at the Holly Springs, North Carolina, facility, but the company eventually hopes to crank out flu vaccines made from cell cultures instead of chicken eggs.

The new plant will do little to bolster the country’s limited supply of shots against the H1N1 swine flu this year. Even so, Novartis is confident that the cell-based technology will scale up manufacturing more quickly, which will allow the company to pump out large batches of vaccine when the next pandemic ultimately strikes.

The US government is clearly banking on the approach. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) invested $487 million to help Novartis build the plant, which should be in production in 2011 and running at full tilt two years later, according to a Novartis press release.

Novartis’ new plant, which plans to grow flu viruses in vats of cells taken from dog kidneys, is not the only incubator of a cell-culture approach. Meriden, Connecticut-based Protein Sciences Corp. is developing a vaccine made by inserting flu genes into an insect virus that is then grown in caterpillar ovary cells. Last week, a US Food and Drug Administration advisory panel narrowly rejected the company’s application, citing safety concerns.

The HHS also doled out handsome grants to the UK’s GlaxoSmithKline and France’s Sanofi-Aventis to develop cell-based flu vaccines. GSK, however, says that the technology is a decade away from usefulness, while Sanofi maintains that the slight reduction in production time is not worth the extra cost of manufacturing. (Wall Street Journal)

It looks like we should keep counting those chickens while they hatch out our flu jabs. But if you want to hear more about the alternatives, listen to an NPR interview with Robert Belshe, director of the Center for Vaccine Development at Saint Louis University School of Medicine in Missouri, who explains the canine and caterpillar counter-options.

Image: Flickr/alvi2047 via Creative Commons

The Oprah effect

jenny-mccarthy
Jenny McCarthy: vaccine expert

When it comes to swine flu vaccine, US health officials seem to be fearing fear itself.

Unlike most countries, the US is not using adjuvants in its swine flu vaccine. To do so, US health authorities must approve them in the vaccine on an ‘emergency’ basis. Why haven’t they?

One reason is that officials are concerned that people will reject the vaccine. That seems clear from recent congressional testimony by Anne Schuchat, head of immunization and respiratory diseases at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Here is an exchange at a hearing last week between Schuchat and representative Bark Stupak:

Stupak: What is the problem with the adjuvant other than we haven’t done the test here in this country? [Referring to data obtained in Europe on the safety of the swine flu adjuvant]

Schuchat: Well, you know — as you know, the public’s confidence in our vaccine system and in vaccines in this country — very, very fragile.

Schuchat voiced similar concerns in an interview with Reuters. The decision surely was not easy for Shuchat and other health officials: if they had decided to use adjuvants, which reduce the dosage needed in a flu shot, the US would probably not be facing vaccine shortages—something I have blogged about before.

Other considerations, of course, factored into the decision. For instance, Jesse Goodman, an FDA official, told congress that the bulk of the safety data for the adjuvanted vaccine has been obtained in people over age 50, “So in terms of the kind of broad experience with millions of people that’s only in the elderly who were not a focus population of this vaccine…we don’t have enough data about those at this point or at the beginning of the pandemic for them to meet the standard of FDA licensure.”

Clearly, officials have the concerns and safety of the public in mind. It is also difficult to fault US agencies for considering the concerns of a public inundated with faulty information on vaccine safety, proliferating on the internet and aired by Don Imus, the Huffington Post and Oprah. Oprah, for instance, recently signed a deal with celebrity anti-vaccine activist Jenny McCarthy. The former playboy bunny is a regular guest on her show.

I wonder if Oprah has got her flu shot yet.

New HIV cases on the decline

AIDSdeaths.jpgThe death toll from AIDS has topped 25 million people, but new infections are dropping sharply, according to a report released today by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and the World Health Organization (WHO).

First, the bad news: according to the new report, titled AIDS Epidemic Update 2009, last year some 2.7 million people became infected with the virus. That brings the total number of people living with the disease to around 33.4 million worldwide.

The good news is that this rate of new HIV infection has been reduced by 17% over the past eight years. Since 2001, HIV incidence has fallen by 15% in sub-Saharan Africa and 25% in East Africa. In South and South East Asia, HIV infections declined by 10% in the same time period.

The report also concluded that the number of AIDS-related deaths has dropped by more than 10% over the past five years. That change, it says, is due in large part to more widespread availability of life saving anti-retroviral treatments.

The report’s rosy glow is no license for complacency, however. “This is a sign that HIV infection prevention efforts are making a difference, but we’re still not moving fast enough to break the trajectory of the virus,” UNAIDS deputy executive director Paul De Lay said at a press conference.

For example, a new case study published in this month’s issue of the journal AIDS describes a particularly nasty strain of HIV that killed a previously healthy 20-year-old within 6 months of infection, even though the virus didn’t show up on standard antibody tests. So, while infections and deaths may be on the decline overall, clinicians and researchers need to stay vigilant to detect the next trick up HIV’s sleeve.

“It is now a morel imperative that we sustain and strengthen the global response to this epidemic,” Teguest Guerma, acting director of the WHO’s HIV/AIDS department, said at the press conference.

Image: UNAIDS

Cannabis for kiddies

Posted on behalf of Elie Dolgin

joint2.JPGIt gives new meaning to term high school: Medical marijuana is reportedly being prescribed to teenagers who suffer from behavioral problems such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

The New York Times reports that a network of 20 clinics in Oakland, California has treated as many as 50 adolescents with ADHD. Up the bay, a Berkeley doctor was investigated by California’s medical board after he authorized the drug for a 16-year-old boy with the disorder.

Bestowing bud upon kids with terminal illnesses like cancer and AIDS is one thing. But with ADHD, the idea of smoking up children seems dazed and confused to many in the medical community. The drug has been linked to many psychotic symptoms, and is likely to aggravate the concentration problems seen in many ADHD kids.

Others don’t think that it’s such a half-baked idea. Marijuana might be safer than many psycho-active prescription drugs, such as Ritalin, often used to treat ADHD, some contend. And far from promoting drug use, a recent report from the Marijuana Policy Project Foundation found that teen dope smoking has not risen in states that have legalized the drug for medical purposes.

For a good round-up of peer-reviewed studies both supporting and opposing medical marijuana usage in children with ADHD, autism or cancer, see the debate at ProCon.org.

Photo by Torben Bjørn Hansen