I found the past two online installments of Nature to be particularly strong.

Sunday’s issue had two papers showing that activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) — a ligand-dependent transcription factor that mediates the action of environmental toxins such as dioxin — plays a role in the pathophysiology of EAE, the commonly used animal model of multiple sclerosis.

Marc Veldhoen et al. and Francisco Quintana et al. found that AHR exacerbated EAE by promoting the differentiation of Th17 cells and the production of IL-22. Remarkably, Quintana and his colleagues went on to show that the effect of AHR depended on the agonist they used; whereas one agonist promoted EAE, a different agonist suppressed the pathology by inducing regulatory T cells. The authors don’t go too far downstream to nail down the transcriptional pathways that are responsible and account for the dual effect of AHR (which is in and of itself not unprecedented), but the possibility that environmental toxins might use this receptor to modify the course of multiple sclerosis in people is very interesting.

Then, on today’s edition of the journal, there are two RNA-related papers that are also very interesting. The first one is a proof-of-principle study by Joacim Elmén et al., showing that it is possible to silence microRNAs in non-human primates. Although therapeutic effects of blocking microRNAs in rodents have been published, there has been scepticism about translating the approach to the clinic. Elmén and his colleagues now show that it is possible to silence a liver microRNA in the green monkey by delivering a locked-nucleic-acid-modified “antimiR”. Moreover, this silencing approach had a functional readout — decreased plasma cholesterol — and no obvious toxicity. This is a reassuring finding for those interested in targeting microRNAs in humans with therapeutic purposes.

The second RNA-related paper reports a somewhat unexpected finding. There are reports that you can use siRNA to target proangiogenic molecules like VEGF or its receptor, and block pathological angiogenesis in patients with neovascularization linked to age-related macular degeneration. Now, Mark Kleinman and his colleagues show that it doesn’t quite matter what molecule you target because a large number of siRNAs (even if some that target non-genomic sequences or antiangiogenic genes) have the same antiangiogenic effect. As long as the siRNA is 21-nucleotides or longer, it will exert an anti-angiogenic effect mediated by the TLR3 signaling cascade. This “class effect” implies that generic siRNAs might be therapeutic agents, and that siRNAs might have unanticipated actions on the vascular and immune systems.

A lot has been said about the link between calorie restriction and aging — eat less, live longer. But if that wasn’t enough, there seems to be a new reason to do away with snacking: calorie restriction has an anti-depressant effect in mice, which depends on orexin-mediated signaling.

Michael Lutter and his colleagues tested mice in two animal models of depression — forced swim (a “depressed” animal will stop trying to escape from the water and will therefore cease to swim) and social defeat (a mouse that has been bullied will express its “depression” by reduced social interactions with other mice). The authors found that, if the mice were on calorie restriction, both their latency to stop swimming and their likelihood to engage in social interactions increased. In other words, the restricted mice did not show signs of depression.

But if the mice lacked orexin, calorie restriction had no effect. Orexin’s claim to fame is its relationship to narcolepsy — people (and some dog breeds) without orexin fall asleep without warning. But orexin has also been linked to the regulation of food and drug reward, pointing to a role for orexin in emotional processes. Lutter et al. further strengthen the link of orexin with depression by showing that mice in the social-defeat model have epigenetic modifications in the orexin promoter, which lead to decreased expression of the orexin gene in the “depressed” mice.

Clearly, the mechanistic link between depression, orexin and calorie restriction could do with some additional tightening. Similarly, the existing animal models of depression and their relevance to human depression are consistently criticized by the community. One also wonders about the behavioral (or “psychological”, if you will) effects of calorie restriction per se on an animal that is undergoing a stressful situation like the one the mice experience in the forced-swim and social-defeat tests. In other words, is the increased latency to show depression a true anti-depressant effect, or is it that the mouse’s hunger causes it to be more anxious in the context of the behavioural testing it is exposed to?

All of that said, other effects of calorie restriction that were originally met with scepticism now enjoy widespread acceptance. Maybe the same will turn out to occur in this fascinating case.

There’s a remarkable number of drugs that people use for which the mechanism of action is unknown, and two papers in the Journal of Neuroscience illustrate this point from two different perspectives.

Methylprednisolone is an anti-inflammatory drug that is often used — with modest success — in multiple sclerosis and (off label) after spinal cord injury. People think that its effect depends on its ability to dampen inflammation but, as Jin-Moo Lee and colleagues show, the drug seems to act in vitro and in vivo (at least in rats) by preventing oligodendrocyte apoptosis through the indirect activation of glucocorticoid receptors. By contrast, the drug has no such protective effect on neurons, which may start to account for its limited therapeutic effect.

The second paper has to do with a drug that people use with recreational, as opposed to therapeutic, purposes — ecstasy. Carla Busceti and her colleagues report that giving ecstasy to mice results in a transient increase in the phosphorylation of tau — the same molecule that is phosphorylated in Alzheimer disease and in a series of conditions known as tauopathies. They further show that the increased phosphorylation, which is primarily seen in the hippocampus, depends on both GSK3β and cdk5, a pair of kinases known to phosphorylate tau. So, ecstasy induces the expression of Dickkopf-1, which inhibits Wnt signalling, thereby increasing GSK3β activity, and it also induces the expression of p25, a known activator of cdk5. It’s very hard to know if there is any relationship between these biochemical changes and neurological diseases, but it would be very interesting to see if there is an increased incidence of any tauopathy in frequent users of ecstasy. I guess we’ll have to wait for epidemiological studies to know the answer.

This week’s issue of JAMA struck me as pretty interesting. They normally publish stuff that’s too clinical or epidemiological for my taste and in comparison to what we publish, but this time they had a themed issue on genomics with four articles reporting associations between gene variants and diseases of different systems.

Two of the articles are relevant to the cardiovascular system. First, Tamali Bhattacharyya and colleagues established a link between polymorphisms that affect the function of paraoxonase 1 (an HDL-bound enzyme with cardioprotective properties), oxidative stress and cardiovascular disease. As might be expected, forms of the enzyme with higher activity were associated with less oxidative stress and a reduced risk of cardiac events.

The second paper, by Irene Bezemer and her colleagues, disclosed gene polymorphisms linked to deep vein thrombosis. These variants affected several genes (CYP4V2, SERPINC1, GP6, KLKB1 and F11), and some of these were also linked to higher levels of coagulation factor XI, hinting at a possible molecular mechanism.

Next, a study by Joyce van Meurs and colleagues reports polymorphisms in the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein LRP5 that are associated with osteoporosis. As mutations in LRP5 had already been linked to bone disorders, it is not entirely surprising that variants of this gene would lead to reduced bone density and increased fracture risk.

Last, but not least, there’s a very intriguing contribution by Elisabeth Binder and her colleagues, who found that variants in the FKBP5 gene (which encodes a protein that interacts with the glucocorticoid receptor to modulate its cortisol-binding affinity and has therefore been linked to physiological responses to stress) interact with the occurrence of abuse during childhood, predicting the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adulthood. The gene variants themselves were not good predictors of PTSD. So, this is a fine example of gene-environment interactions in the context of mental disease.

Very interesting associations indeed. Hopefully they’ll lead to some hardcore molecular work that results in some mechanistic insight into the biological meaning of this gene polymorphisms that goes above and beyond the correlations found in these studies.

Two papers in Nature these past few days reported on some very intriguing biology of cancer cells.

Some tumor cells have the peculiar property of acting like anaerobic cells, producing lactate even in the presence of oxygen — a property known as aerobic glycolysis or the Warburg phenomenon. The molecular mechanisms behind this phenotype are not clear, but the first of these two papers provides a very solid clue to account for it. Heather Christofk and her colleagues show that a switch between isoforms of the glycolytic enzyme pyruvate kinase is crucial for aerobic glycolysis and tumorigenesis. Tumor cells express the embryonic M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase, but by knocking it down and replacing it with the M1 (adult) isoform, the authors reversed aerobic glycolysis and reduced tumor growth in mice.

The second paper takes a look at the hardcore signaling that takes place inside tumor cells. We know very well that the Ras-PI3K-AKT pathway is crucial for tumor maintenance. The new study, by Kian-Huat Lim and colleagues, shows that blocking the AKT-mediated phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) also inhibits tumor maintenance. As eNOS enhances the nitrosylation and activity of Ras proteins, which are required for tumorigenesis, the authors come full circle by proposing a (mutated) Ras-PI3K-AKT-eNOS-(wild-type) Ras pathway for tumor growth.