Peanut allergy therapy produces epigenetic changes in immune cells

Earlier this week, news that six months of exposure therapy to peanuts enabled almost 100 children with an allergy to this food to eat the equivalent of ten peanuts stirred a lot of optimism. It was just one of many studies showing that some patients with severe peanut allergies can actually gain the ability to consume small amounts of the food by eating a little bit of this nut each day, gradually increasing the dose over several months.

Scientists may now have a better handle on how this ability to shrug off peanut allergy forms, and why some individuals respond to the treatment while others do not. A study published today in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology reports that the immune cells of some patients with peanut allergies who became tolerant to peanuts after exposure therapy showed DNA modifications thought to perhaps have a role in defending against allergies. “By understanding what changes occur,” says lead author Kari Nadeau, an immunologist at the Stanford School of Medicine in California, “we can identify targets for new therapy and biomarkers by which we can decide whether or not to keep treating a patient.”

Continue reading

New classification system proposed for breast cancer types

Since the late 1970s, clinicians have distinguished breast cancers types according to the presence or absence of certain receptors that sit on the surface of these tumor cells. Depending on the receptors found—namely, the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)—a doctor can get a better sense of the prognosis and which treatments might work.

Now, a study published this week in the Journal of Clinical Investigation proposes a new conceptual framework that classifies breast cancers based on whether the cells possess receptors for other molecules, such as androgen and vitamin D. Under this system, current cancer subtypes would be stratified into one of four groups.

“I’m very excited about this paper,” says Jorge Reis-Filho, a pathologist at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York who was not involved in the research. He adds that the proposed classification system could point to new therapies for breast cancers previously categorized as unlikely to respond to treatment.

In the new study, researchers sought to explain some of the diversity observed in human breast tumors by obtaining a more detailed understanding of normal breast cell subtypes. “I approached this question like an evolutionary biologist trying to figure out the ancestry of a species,” says study co-author Tan Ince, a pathologist at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.

Ince and his team scanned samples of normal breast tissue for proteins expressed in a “bimodal” or on/off pattern—highly expressed in some cells but completely absent in others. The researchers focused in on the handful of proteins that displayed this pattern. They subsequently characterized 11 previously undescribed subtypes of luminal cells—one of the two major epithelial cell types found in mammary glands—that each expressed distinct combinations of these proteins.

Continue reading

Migraine study attributes more than half a drug’s benefit to placebo effect

The information that clinicians provide to patients about a medication prescribed for their migraines can influence the magnitude of pain relief induced by the treatment, reports a study published online today in Science Translational Medicine. The findings suggest that patients who receive positive messages about the potential efficacy of their treatment may have better treatment outcomes than patients who receive negative messages.

The study involved 66 patients with recurring migraine attacks, which are characterized by symptoms such as debilitating headaches, nausea, sensitivity to light and even experiencing aura. Some research has linked the condition to ion channel defects in brain cells that cause certain neurons to become overactive.

Patients first recorded their baseline pain intensity on a scale from zero (no pain) to ten (maximal pain) for an untreated migraine attack. Then each study participant received a series of six envelopes containing treatment for six subsequent migraine attacks: two of the envelopes were labeled as “placebo”, two as “Maxalt” (the anti-migraine drug rizatriptan sold by the New Jersey-based pharmaceutical giant Merck) and two as “placebo or Maxalt.” However, for each pair of envelopes with identical labels, one envelope actually contained a placebo pill, whereas the other contained Maxalt.

Continue reading