Overlooked opportunity and delayed discovery: a case study

This past Sunday, Louise Brown, the first child created by in vitro fertilization, turned 32. She might have been born several years earlier if the UK’s Medical Research Council had supported the work of Robert Edwards and Patrick Steptoe. A new paper in Human Reproduction takes a closer look at the reasons behind the British council’s decision to not fund the work that would lead to the world’s first “test tube baby”.

At the time, the hot topic was addressing the problem of overpopulation &mdash the idea of fertility treatments seemed egregiously wasteful. The MRC wanted more extensive trials with primate subjects before IVF was attempted in humans. The paper also suggests that the council was also put off by the media presence of Edwards and Steptoe, who were seen as outside the medical establishment; the former was neither a professor nor a medical doctor, and the latter was a gynecologist from a small northern English hospital.

Edwards and Steptoe eventually succeeded in pioneering IVF procedures with the backing of private funds, but their story resonates today. The competition for public research dollars can lead to scientists gravitating towards trendy areas, leaving so-called “Cinderella topics” languishing for want of funds. In the rush to comb every bit of DNA for disease biomarkers, what might the medical community be overlooking? What areas of research are neglected today? We welcome your comments below.

Undercover investigation finds genetic tests “misleading”

dnalights.jpgA new report from the US Government Accountability Office on direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies came out yesterday, and you don’t have to look much further than the title to guess what they found: “Misleading Test Results Are Further Complicated by Deceptive Marketing and Other Questionable Practices”. In an undercover operation, government investigators bought genetic tests from four companies. They sent the companies two samples from each volunteer donor &mdash one with a factual medical history and profile, and one where details of race, age, and medical history were fictitious.

The same DNA sample would bring up different risk predictions amongst all four companies, probably due to the fact that different companies focus on different genetic markers. Risk predictions often conflicted with donors’ family medical history and, in some cases, actual medical conditions: one donor, who had a pacemaker implanted to treat irregular heartbeat, was told he had little risk of developing heart problems. None of the companies were able to provide complete test results for the specimens from volunteers assigned fictitious Asian or African ancestry, apparently due to a lack of data on these populations; but companies failed to explicitly state these limitations before the investigators purchased the tests. Follow-up consultations often provided generalized advice, such as quitting smoking to reduce the risk of heart attack.

Continue reading →

Avandia update: trial suspended, panelists conflicted, mechanism discovered

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may have voted to keep Avandia on the shelf, but the agency remains worried enough about the beleaguered diabetes drug to tell GlaxoSmithKline, Avandia’s manufacturer, to momentarily halt its use in a clinical trial. Today, the FDA told the pharma giant that its ongoing study, called TIDE, which compares Avandia (rosiglitazone) to its chief competitor, Takeda Pharmaceuticals’ Actos (pioglitazone), would be placed on partial clinical hold. This means that no new subjects can be recruited, but currently enrolled patients can continue treatment.

Meanwhile, two possible conflicts of interest with members of the FDA advisory panels have emerged over the past few days. The Wall Street Journal found that David Capuzzi, one of the three panelists who voted to leave Avandia on market with no new warnings, was paid $14,750 by GSK, at least $6,750 of which came after 2008. Capuzzi says he was paid to speak about lipid-lowering drug named Lovaza, but a GSK spokesman told Pharmalot that at least one talk prior to 2008 was for Avandia.

Continue reading →

Cancer trials put on hold after researcher caught padding resume

Cross posted from Nature’s The Great Beyond blog.

Anil.jpgThree clinical trials have been placed on hold after news broke that a researcher involved with the studies may have lied on his resume.

Cancer researcher Anil Potti of the Duke University School of Medicine has been placed on “administrative leave” pending an investigation into false claims, listed on applications for research funds, that he was a Rhodes Scholar. According to the New York Times, the American Cancer Society has also suspended payment of a $729,000 grant awarded to Potti based on an application that referenced the Rhodes scholarship.

The cancer trials aimed to test whether patterns of gene expression in tumours could be used to predict how those tumours respond to specific cancer drugs. Such predictions have been dreamt of since the earliest days of genome-wide gene expression analysis, and Potti and his coworkers appeared to take a significant step toward that goal in a 2006 Nature Medicine paper.

Read the rest of the post on The Great Beyond.

Microbicide offers double whammy against HIV and Herpes

The report of a microbicide gel that actually protects against HIV infection made waves earlier this week. Now comes news that the same product — which is based on the antiretroviral drug tenofovir — also reduces a woman’s risk of contracting herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2).

In a paper published online in Science on Monday, Quarraisha and Salim Abdool Karim, along with their colleagues, reported that the vaginal gel cut HIV infection by 39% compared to placebo. And yesterday, the husband-and-wife team behind the 889-women South African trial announced at the International AIDS Conference in Vienna that, among the 426 women who were HSV-2-negative before the trial began, half as many participants using the gel became infected with herpes compared with those in the placebo arm of the study.

A precursor compound to tenofovir called adefovir currently exists to treat HSV-2 infection. But tenofovir, which blocks viral replication, is only approved for the treatment of HIV. Both drugs are marketed by Foster City, California-based Gilead Sciences.

Robert Grant, a clinical virologist at the University of California–San Francisco, applauded the study authors for thinking to check both HIV and HSV-2 infection levels in their study. “It goes to show that sometimes you learn unexpected things from well-designed science projects," he told ScienceNOW. “It’s a nice example of how prevention interventions can synergize with each other.”

Thumbs down for fast-tracked breast cancer drug

avastin.jpg

An advisory panel to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dealt a blow to the Swiss drug maker Roche today, voting 12-1 to revoke approval for the company’s blockbuster cancer drug Avastin (bevacizumab) for treating advanced forms of breast cancer.

The drug was given the nod for breast cancer two years ago under a special mechanism called ‘accelerated approval’. As a condition of approval, Roche was compelled to conduct follow-up clinical trials to test Avastin’s benefits alongside conventional chemotherapy. Two studies showed more side effects among women on the drug and no added survival benefit.

Given Avastin’s demonstrated risks of gastrointestinal perforations, bleeding and blood clots, the data “does not support this being effective” in treating advanced breast cancer, panel chairman Wyndham Wilson, the US National Cancer Institute’s head of lymphoma therapeutics section, told Reuters.

Continue reading →

Vienna AIDS conference calls for reformation of global drug policy

syringe.gif

When the AIDS epidemic first roared to life in the 1980s, the slow initial response of world governments to address the outbreak can, in part, be attributed to the stigma of its association with homosexuality. But now what was once derisively termed the “gay plague” is looking more and more like the “drug user plague”.

Outside of sub-Saharan Africa, where the AIDS virus is largely spread through heterosexual intercourse, one in every three new cases of HIV is contracted through the use of injectable drugs. In Central Asia and Eastern Europe, where the virus is spreading fastest, it’s estimated that drug users account for 80% of all HIV cases. And now, just as then, the stigma associated with its victims’ habits is costing lives.

To that end, the organizers of this year’s International AIDS Conference have made the reformation of global drug policy a major theme of discussion. The Vienna Declaration calls for governments and international organizations to decriminalize drug users, conduct aggressive reviews of the effectiveness of their drug policies, and offer more treatment options for this marginalized population.

Continue reading →

Homeopathic treatment works! (But not in a good way.)

Cross posted from Nature’s The Great Beyond blog.

Good news for proponents of alternative medicine: a paper published in a prestigious medical journal appears to demonstrate that a homeopathic remedy really does have a pretty powerful biological effect. Unfortunately, this effect is to rob some users of their sense of smell.

Concerns that popular ‘homeopathic’ cold remedy zinc gluconate can cause a loss of smell have been around for a while. Now an analysis by two San Diego researchers shows these concerns may be well founded

Read the rest of the post on The Great Beyond.

Earlier antiretroviral therapy recommended for HIV patients

nrg1246-f1.jpg

There’s an emerging consensus among AIDS experts that treating HIV earlier reduces mortality, slows the progression of AIDS and may even reduce transmission of the virus. But just how early that treatment should start depends on who you ask.

At the International AIDS Conference in Vienna today, the World Health Organization released new guidelines saying that antiretroviral therapy should be initiated when a patient’s CD4 cell count drops below 350 cells per microliter. The previous WHO standard, adopted in 2006, advised starting therapy when CD4 levels dropped below 200 cells per microliter. Earlier treatment, the WHO says, could reduce AIDS-related deaths by about 20% over the next five years.

The new guidelines, if adopted, would expand the number of people needing treatment to 15 million worldwide. The WHO estimates this increase will push costs for HIV treatment up to $9 billion in 2010. But the added expenditure could be offset by a decrease in hospital costs, since delaying treatment means patients will eventually require more expensive drugs as they become sicker.

Continue reading →