Lasker winners wax historical

Hot on the heels of yesterday’s announcement of the recipients of this year’s Lasker Awards, Nature Medicine is proud to present a special focus dedicated to the prize-winning accomplishments, written by the prize-winners themselves. (Click on the cover to the right to go straight there.)

Following a foreword by Joseph Goldstein, chair of the Lasker Awards jury, each of this year’s four awardees hark back to the respective discoveries that earned them the $250,000 prize, and place the historical findings in a modern context of translational medicine.

Douglas Coleman of the Jackson Laboratory offers “”https://www.nature.com/focus/Lasker/2010/pdf/Lasker2010-Coleman.pdf">a historical perspective on leptin"; Rockefeller University’s Jeffrey M. Friedman tells “”https://www.nature.com/focus/Lasker/2010/pdf/Lasker2010-Friedman.pdf">a tale of two hormones"; Napoleone Ferrara from Genentech describes how he went “”https://www.nature.com/focus/Lasker/2010/pdf/Lasker2010-Friedman.pdf">from basic science to therapy" with vascular endothelial growth factor; and Oxford’s David Weatherall descibes “”https://www.nature.com/focus/Lasker/2010/pdf/Lasker2010-Weatherall.pdf">the long road from the bedside through the laboratory to the community" with thalassemia medications.

And while we’re feeling nostalgic, be sure to check out our past Lasker specials from 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

First pill form MS treatment wins approval

The treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS) are, sadly, limited. All existing medications — from interferons like Merck’s Rebif to Teva’s immunomodulator Copaxone to Biogen’s monoclonal antibody-based Tysabri — require regular injections. So it comes as welcome news to MS sufferers that federal regulators have approved the first oral treatment for the disease, Gilenya, manufactured by the Swiss drug maker Novartis.

The thumbs-up from the US Food and Drug Administration was highly anticipated after an advisory panel voted unanimously in June in favor of the drug for treating relapsing MS. The announcement also comes less than two weeks after regulators in Russia approved the pill.

Being the first with a oral MS treatment could prove to be a big advantage for Novartis, with some analysts predicting sales of up to $3.5 billion. But Merck could be close behind. In the past two months, both Russia and Australia approved Merck’s cladribine tablets; and, in July, the FDA granted Merck’s application priority review status after the regulator had rejected a previous submission last year. A final decision on cladribine is expected toward the end of the year.

Gilenya’s success, however, is by no means guaranteed. Many observers — and competitors — have issued cautionary statements about the drug’s mixed profile of side effects. Biogen, for instance, wrote in a press release: “The long-term safety profile of Gilenya has yet to be established, and there is limited data for it in patients with certain common comorbidities.”

In a Community Corner article in the March 2010 issue of Nature Medicine, Hans Link from the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden also warned of serious viral infections and cancer, while Roland Martin from the University Medical Center-Eppendorf in Hamburg, Germany raised the prospect of reduced blood cell counts, brain inflammation and heart problems

Another novel treatment option under development for MS are immuno-tolerizing vaccines. For more on that research, you can read my feature story from July.

Avastin gets a breather

Two months after an advisory panel recommended that federal regulators withdraw Genentech’s $6 billion-a-year blockbuster Avastin for treating breast cancer, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has given itself another three months before making any final decisions.

There have been serious issues with the drug, which is often a last-resort for late-stage breast cancer patients, but which has been shown to cause serious side effects, among them arterial blockage in the lungs, gastrointestinal perforation, and severe bleeding.

In November 2009, Genentech, the San Francisco-based company that makes Avastin, asked the FDA to approve an expansion of the drug’s use in treating advanced forms of breast cancer. The FDA was expected to rule on that question last Friday, but that deadline has been extended until 17 December to give the agency time to review new data submitted by the company.

Continue reading →

Lasker Awards go to leptin and VEGF discoverers

lasker.jpg

Two researchers who discovered a hormone intimately linked to obesity and a scientist who found a protein associated to a common form of blindness have won this year’s Lasker awards — the $250,000 prizes that often hint at future Nobel Prize recipients.

Jackson Laboratory’s Douglas Coleman and Rockefeller University’s Jeffrey Friedman took home the Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award for co-discovering that the hormone leptin helps regulate appetite and body weight. In the 1970s, Coleman first showed that mice have some sort of appetite-suppressing substance in the blood, which Friedman later identified and called leptin, in 1994. (For a review by Friedman into therapeutic avenues of obesity research, click here.)

This year’s Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award was awarded to Genentech molecular biologist Napoleone Ferrara, who discovered how to block the protein VEGF inhibitors to prevent vision loss in people suffering from wet macular degeneration. Roche-Genentech now markets a drug called Lucentis, which has been the focus on some controversy. (For a review by Ferrara into the VEGF receptors, click here.)

David Weatherall, a retired medical geneticist from the University of Oxford, was also honored with the Lasker-Koshland Special Achievement Award in Medical Science for 50 years of “international statesmanship in biomedical science,” including discoveries into the genetic blood disorder thalassemia.

To find out why the Lasker Awards are a lot like papal portraiture, check out this commentary written last year by the chair of the Lasker Awards Jury, Joseph Goldstein.

Weighty setbacks for obesity drugs

Americans battling obesity and hoping for a pill to help them lose weight will have to keep waiting: A US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) panel yesterday voted against approving Arena Pharmaceuticals’ experimental weight-loss pill lorcaserin.

The FDA panel’s stamp of disapproval — which cited safety concerns about tumors seen in rats, along with higher rates of depression and memory loss among people taking the pill — comes only months after the federal regulator rejected a similar obesity drug, Vivus’s Qnexa.

With two drugs down, the only remaining contender to become the first new prescription diet drug in a decade is Orexigen’s Contrave, which will have its day before federal regulators later this year. In June, Orexigen scientists presented data at the American Diabetes Association meeting showing that Contrave helped diabetics lose weight and control their blood sugar better than a placebo.

As a further setback to the diet drug field, half the 16 members of a FDA advisory panel recommended Wednesday that the agency take Abbott Laboratories’s weight-loss drug Meridia off the market. A study out this month in the New England Journal of Medicine found the risk of a cardiac disease was 16% higher among people taking Meridia compared to placebo.

Besides Meridia, the only other prescription diet drug on the market is orlistat, which is sold under the trade name Xenical by Genentech/Roche, and over-the-counter as Alli by GlaxoSmithKline.

To read more about the mechanism of action of Qnexa and related drugs, see out earlier news story on anti-obesity medications.

Look at me, I’m Sandra Dee, PhD

girlphd.jpgWomen mount the highest steps of the ivory tower in greater numbers each year&mdash a growth pattern resembling that of a kudzu vine more than that of the proverbial ivy.

In the US, women have been earning solid majorities of the bachelor’s and master’s degrees for more than a decade. And in the past few years, women have overtaken men at the doctoral level as well. A report from the Council of Graduate Schools released this week shows a small lead, with women just clearing the mark at 50.4% of doctorate-level degrees conferred in 2008-2009. But another set of statistics, released by the US Department of Education in May, show a greater lead even earlier, with women taking 51% of all doctoral degrees awarded in 2007-2008.

Continue reading →

Your popular friends? They are your disease bellwether

grouphug.jpgIntroverts, take heart: social butterflies might get invited to more parties, but they’ll probably get sicker quicker. And monitoring the status updates of your classmate with 3,000 Facebook friends could potentially alert you to the leading edge of the next campus flu epidemic.

Nicholas Christakis and James Fowler, of Harvard University and UC San Diego, respectively, have collaborated before on research that examines how social networks shape health, economics, and behavior. Their latest study, examining how friend groups characterize the spread of influenza, appears today in PLoS ONE.

They followed 744 Harvard undergraduate students throughout the course of an on-campus flu outbreak in 2009. The students were divided into two groups. The first was a group of randomly chosen individuals. The other was composed of students that were named by members of the first group as their friends &mdash and were therefore more popular. (It’s a quirk of human behavior that when asked to name their friends, people usually name individuals that are more popular than they are. This is known as the friendship paradox, which can be summed up as: “your friends have more friends than you do”.)

The study found that flu spread faster and peaked sooner within the second group than within the random sampling of students, meaning that people more central to the social network contracted the illness sooner.

Continue reading →

Amidst growing vaccine concerns, NIH sets up engine for answers

vaccineinit.jpgInfectious diseases, and, by extension, the vaccines against them, occupy a lofty spot on the totem pole of public health. In the US, many states have laws requiring certain vaccines. Perhaps not uncoincidentally, the US government maintains the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which compensates individuals injured by the (albeit rare) side effects of vaccines, among them allergic reactions, seizures and chronic arthritis. The program has come into the spotlight in recent years as some parents have voiced concerns about the safety of various shots. Given all this, the US government has an extra incentive to ensure the safety and efficacy of immunizations. (Click here to continue reading)

Image via istockphoto

The vaccine credibility gap

redsyringe.jpgThe US federal government has sent some rather mixed messages on the link between vaccines and autism over the past few weeks.

Last week, the federal “Vaccine Court”, established to address the nearly 5,000 pending claims from parents who believe their children developed autism due to vaccinations, decided to award the family of 9-year-old Hannah Poling more than $1.5 million dollars for the cost of caring for their daughter, lost earnings, and pain and suffering, followed by an annual award of more than $500,000. The vaccine court ruled favorably on the Polings’ claim in 2008, and is the first and only successful claim filed thus far.

The government stopped short of saying that vaccines “caused” Poling’s autism, saying instead that the childhood vaccines aggravated a previously unknown mitochondrial disorder, “resulting” in autism.

Continue reading →

Theory is acid test for fructose’s blood pressure role

fieldofcorn.jpgBy Roxanne Khamsi

Fructose is under fire. In recent years, the simple sugar has endured close scrutiny from scientists who claim that it increases the risk of obesity more than its cousin glucose does. Now, some researchers would like to add liver abnormalities and high blood pressure to the list of fructose’s offenses, and they offer the theory that one particular molecule—uric acid—could mediate these possible ill effects. (Click here to continue reading)

Image via istockphoto