The three-year PhD program: good for students? Or too good to be true?

Calls to modernize the PhD to meet the demands of the job market are being answered by the introduction of a more streamlined three-year PhD program. But such changes are not necessarily in the best interests of students, say Alice Risely and Adam Cardilini

PhD students are the backbone of the research industry, often responsible for compiling precious datasets for their lab and learning the cutting-edge techniques required for analysis. But completing a PhD is hard, and getting harder as scientific standards creep steadily upwards. It takes over a year longer for current students to publish their first scientific paper than those 30 years ago because of the increasing data requirements of top journals. Across Europe and Australia, this is one reason why students are taking an average of four to six years (or longer) to complete their PhDs, despite candidature contracts usually being a maximum of four years, and government scholarships lasting at most three and a half years.

Delays in completion reflect badly on universities, and can threaten future funding. They can also threaten the job prospects of graduates, who are increasingly expected to have excellent time and project management skills for careers outside academia. In an attempt to combat lagging completion times and increase employability of graduates, universities are redesigning the PhD by rolling out three-year PhD programs. These shorter programs are intended to provide increased structural support to students, whilst also promoting broader and more applied skills required by non-academic employers. The catch is that these PhDs must be completed within three years, unless the student faces project delays that were unequivocally beyond their control. But is the three-year PhD program really in the best interests of all, or even most, students?

It will be harder to get PhD extensions under the new model.

It will be harder to get PhD extensions under the new model.

Continue reading

An overseas research intern’s journey in Japan

My overseas internship experience significantly increased my knowledge of research culture and lifestyles in foreign countries.

Guest contributor Andy Tay

Previously, I shared my thoughts on the usefulness of an overseas working experience to establish networks with international experts, and to develop cultural awareness — both of critical importance in a researcher’s career. This year, I decided to head to Japan, Tokyo to work on stem cells as a summer intern at the RIKEN Brain Science Institute (BSI).

If you’re thinking of an overseas internship, especially in Japan, my hope is that this will be of help to you.

andy in japan-smaller

Andy in his new lab

Continue reading

Q&A: Progress for Congress

A neuroscientist wants to see change in the government — and he’s creating it.

Thomas Prigg is a brain cell circuitry researcher at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US. Now he’s using his science skills to fuel his campaign for Congress in 2018. He talks to Nikki Forrester. Continue reading

Scientific play is a serious business

Iva Njunjić’s dream to explore caves and work on cave beetles took her far from her home country of Serbia — to the beautiful island of Borneo.

Bod Tai cave on Borneo-smaller

This photo was taken during field work in Sabah, Malaysia where Prof. Menno Schilthuizen, his PhD student Mohd Zacaery bin Khalik and I went to explore caves and hunt for new species of cave invertebrates. We spent many days around a small village on the Kinabatangan River, trying to locate caves in numerous limestone hills and gather information about the organisms that live there. Continue reading

Marketing yourself, politics and post-truth

Successful marketing can land you your dream job, but does this really mean you are the best person for the role?

Achieving your dream job is always going to be a bit of a challenge. You may have a great degree, and maybe relevant experience, but getting your potential employer to believe you are absolutely the right person for the job means marketing yourself correctly. This can be tricky, particularly if you are starting off new in a field with no established reputation behind you.

Continue reading

Taking the long way to international development

How Panagiotis Vagenas ended up withdrawing from NIH funding for a research position with a non-governmental organization.

I work for Project Concern International (PCI), an international development nonprofit, in San Diego, California. In my role as the Senior Technical Advisor for Research, Monitoring, Learning and Evaluation, I lead the organization’s research agenda and advise PCI staff in the US and our field offices in low and middle-income countries around the world on rigorous research methodologies. Most of my colleagues found a more straightforward route into the field of international development. My path was longer.

IMG_3429-smaller

Some of the beneficiaries of PCI’s Women Empowered initiative.

Training in biochemistry and immunology

After leaving school in Greece I studied biochemistry at Imperial College London. I stayed in basic science for the next 14 years, pursuing a master’s in biochemistry and a PhD in immunology, still at Imperial, followed by a postdoctoral fellowship in the Population Council’s labs at the Rockefeller University in New York City.

I enjoyed my lab work on HIV vaccines but wanted my work to be closer to the impact on human lives. Mentorship is crucial and looking for additional mentors outside one’s primary role is beneficial. Even the most senior colleagues are happy to offer advice and spend time mentoring. After ten years in the lab, I pursued a Master’s in public health (MPH), at Yale University.

Moving to public health

After my MPH, I started a second postdoctoral fellowship at the Yale School of Medicine. I joined a dynamic multi-disciplinary group of public health, anthropology and communications PhDs, complemented by physicians with interests beyond the clinic, all of whom investigated the intersection of substance abuse and HIV among vulnerable populations, including prisoners, sex workers, transgender women and men who have sex with men (MSM).

This work exposed me directly to the overwhelming disparities faced by these populations, especially in the developing world. My main project focused on alcohol use disorders among MSM in Peru and how these fuel the HIV epidemic. I was also involved in clinical trials of an opiate antagonist, naltrexone, for the treatment of alcohol use disorders among people living with HIV in Peru, as well as in New Haven, CT and Springfield, MA.

Looking for funding

After my postdoc, I joined the faculty of the Yale School of Medicine. When I reached the essential stage of securing my own research funding, however, I hit a roadblock. The 2013 US budget sequestration hit the NIH hard and money for research was hard to find. My first attempts at a NIH grant were rejected. Continuing to live with inadequate salary support for more than four years was suffocating – a problem I hear constantly from fellow academics. It is very disappointing that following many years of specialization, both adequate pay and research support are extremely hard to find, even at a prestigious research institution like Yale.

Jumping ship

My desire to be closer to the human impact of my work never diminished, so I believed that this was finally the time to jump ship from academia and join an organization that implements projects on the ground and directly helps the lives of those who need it the most. Research positions in global health and international development organizations are not plentiful, but these organizations are realizing the impact that rigorous research can have in their work, as well as providing a direct feedback loop of knowledge from the implementation of programs back into the design of new programs. PCI has made such a commitment to rigorous research. It implements a very broad spectrum of projects not just in public health, ranging from women’s empowerment and human rights, to nutrition, literacy, water and sanitation, HIV, TB and Ebola, urban development and resilience and emergency humanitarian assistance.

Research in the development field

This transition was not without its challenges. While I am leading a number of studies, my main role is to advise on research methodologies, instead of being the researcher myself. In addition to that, the breadth of the subject areas I now work in is large and the learning curve was steep. Nevertheless, the work has been fascinating and rewarding.

PCI’s Women Empowered (WE) Initiative has occupied a big part of my time in my first year here. WE is a multi-country savings-led microfinancing program, which aims to empower women both socially and financially. It does that by bringing women together in a group setting where they learn how to save money, in addition to discussing social themes of interest to them and their communities. The results are inspiring: during a visit to PCI’s Guatemala offices last summer, I met with many WE group members in the remote highlands of Huehuetenango province whose enthusiasm for PCI’s initiative was hard to mask, even in the middle of unmistakable poverty. I met a happy, outgoing woman who shared with me that before WE, she had no social network and no say in her home.

Another, a young single mother, used a loan from her WE group’s savings to build her own home, which she showed our team with great pride. Seeing these women, talking to them in person and hearing how PCI truly transformed their lives was deeply moving and finally gave me the personal satisfaction and fulfilment I was always seeking from my work.

A research study on WE that I am leading investigated the post-project sustainability of our WE initiative in Ethiopia, between three and six years from the end of the PCI program. PCI is committed to designing programs that are sustainable after our support ends and has committed funding to researching this sustainability. WE groups were still meeting even six years after PCI support ended. Analysis of our overall impact is under way currently, but the preliminary results are encouraging and full of lessons for future sustainable programming.

An email in March

A few months into my new job, I received an email from the NIH saying that my reapplication for my research grant at Yale was slated to be funded. I went on to withdraw that application because I was now in a position that meant more to me in many levels.

The reason I want to share this story is to encourage fellow scientists who may be not fully satisfied in their work to think outside the box and be open to options that may not be immediately obvious – and who knows, you may end up in a paradise like San Diego! I feel that my science background and career path have made me a strong researcher, ready to develop professionally in my new field, a field that may be more open to science PhDs than one may initially think!

 

Panagiotis Vagenas grew up in Athens, Greece; studied biochemistry and immunology at Imperial College London and public health at Yale University. He conducted research on HIV vaccines at Rockefeller University and HIV and substance abuse at Yale University. He is now the senior researcher at Project Concern International (PCI), an international development nonprofit in San Diego. You can find him on LinkedIn and Twitter.

 

Suggested postspic-smaller-cropped

Impact: the search for science that matters

Finding job satisfaction as a science liaison

Finding job satisfaction as a humanitarian researcher

Charities: Profiting from non-profits

Meditation on a Caltrain: Understanding where to travel to next

Exploring options and thinking laterally about where you can use your scientific skills might be the key to successfully transitioning into industry, learns George Busby.

This piece was one of two winners of the Science Innovation Union writing competition, Oxford.

“This is downtown San Francisco, our train’s final stop. Can all passengers please detrain? All detrain please. All detrain.” Perhaps it was the heady fug of jetlag that made this broadcast particularly amusing to my UK-English language sensibilities, but I “detrained” all the same and stepped into the crisp morning air of the Californian rush hour.

I was on the west coast to visit two genetics start-ups as part of a whirlwind three-day tour of the US. With a long postdoc and several first author papers tucked into my belt, I wanted to see if these credentials would pass muster in the tech haven of Silicon Valley. I’ve always found the loneliness of solo work-travel to be highly amenable to strategic thought, and this American adventure was an opportunity to reflect on why I was there and what I wanted.GettyImages-530306679-smaller

Continue reading

Should you join a start-up company after academia?

A career in a start-up company is more than just risk, discovers Idil Cazimoglu.

This piece was one of two winners of the Science Innovation Union writing competition, Oxford.

“Risky.”

My housemate, now in the final year of his PhD, had a one-word answer to my question “Would you consider working in a start-up company after you graduate?”

Intrigued, I posed this question to fellow PhD students in various disciplines over the following weeks, and received similar answers including “I don’t want to live in uncertainty,” “No job security,” “Academia is more stable,” and, memorably, “I’d rather go bungee jumping.”

rocket-1122402_1920

Not everything launches so smoothly

Continue reading

Out of the lab and onto the streets

Nicole Forrester recounts and reflects on her experience at the March for Science in Washington D.C.

April 22 began with a drizzly ride on rented bikes through the streets of southeast D.C. to the Washington monument. I was accompanied by Dylan Jones, an outdoor recreation and environmental writer from West Virginia. “I typically opt for escaping civilization on Earth Day,” Jones said, “but today I decided to go straight into the heart of it.” We weaved through roads littered with people in rain shells and lab coats, carrying vibrant signs and rainbow umbrellas.

Capitol-smaller-cropped

Continue reading