Nature Chemistry issue 2 – live today

Just a quick heads-up for the second issue.

Apart from a stunning cover and some very interesting research articles (which have attracted quite a few write-ups elsewhere), there’s a good mix of ‘front-half’ articles too.

The prolific Derek Lowe reviews the book Drug Truths: Dispelling the Myths About Pharma R&D by John L. LaMattina, the former head of Pfizer’s global R+D – what he doesn’t know about developing new drugs could probably be quite easily tweeted!

Blogroll covers a subject that, as an editor, I’d never thought caused so much heartache: Acknowledgements. Negotiating the political mine-field is obviously harder than I thought…

One of our soon-to-be-regular Thesis writers is Michelle Francl (you may read her blog The Culture of Chemistry – I do) and her first article reflects on a subject dear to this blog’s heart, the periodic table. See how long it takes you to work out what her sibling wrote on the postcard.

Neil

Neil Withers (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Reactions – Alán Aspuru-Guzik

Alán Aspuru-Guzik is an assistant professor in the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, and works at the interface of theoretical physical chemistry and quantum information.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

My junior high school teacher in Mexico was an inspiration. He was a biochemist with a passion for the inner workings of proteins and enzymes. I later had the opportunity of representing Mexico at the International Chemistry Olympiad held in Oslo, Norway, in 1994. By then, I had a a tough choice between studying computer science or chemistry. The inclination for computer science, however, never faded away. For my Ph.D., I carried out large-scale computing using quantum Monte Carlo. During my postdoc years, I began working at the interface between quantum computation and chemistry, and this is still one of my current research topics as an independent faculty.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

If I were not a scientist, I can imagine many other possible alter egos. On dreamy days, I see myself as a film maker, doing independent film, or as a (very) progressive politician.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

I have a few projects going on in my lab at Harvard right now. At a first glance, they seem diverse, but all are at the interface between theoretical chemistry, quantum information, and renewable energies. We are interested in charge and excitation transport in photosynthetic systems and organic photovoltaic materials. For example, we are working together with IBM on the Clean Energy Project/World Community Grid: This is a distributed computing project using spare computer time from donors around the world to search for molecular crystals that transport excitations and charge as efficiently as possible. We hope that one day, our theoretical studies will lead to better organic solar cells and organic electronics applications.

In the field of quantum computing, we recently carried out the first quantum chemistry calculation of the hydrogen molecule using a prototype optical quantum computer together with the group of Andrew White (Queensland).

We also work in other places where quantum information and chemistry come together: the electronic structure of complex systems, such as molecules attached to plasmonic nanoparticles could be benefited by our work on density functional theory for open quantum systems.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

I would have liked to meet with Isaac Newton. He was quite a character and a revolutionary scientist in his time. I recommend reading his great historical biography, Never at rest by Richard Westfall.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

I am a theoretician, so you would expect it was quite a while ago! But you would be wrong. Two months ago, Ted Betley, one of my inorganic chemistry colleagues in my department, and myself conducted chemical experiments for a group of childen. Ted made sure that I, as a theoretician, was not working unsupervised!

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

I would probably take a complex recursive book, such as The Saragossa Manuscript by Jan Potocki or Don Quijote de la Mancha by Cervantes. As a music album, without a second of thinking about it, it would be Clandestino by Manu Chao. Clandestino is an album in which songs are linked together into one hour-long song that takes immigrants as its central theme and the tough life one may have if one is forced to live a clandestine existence. The songs are in many languages, and if you have not heard Manu Chao, you can get a taste by watching videos of him on YouTube.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions?

I would like to see what Professor Takuzo Aida, from the University of Tokyo has to say. I just heard him talk at a light-harvesting conference in Bayreuth, Germany, and I became a fan of his work.

Chempod: DNA litmus test and ACS round-up

The second chemistry@nature podcast of 2009 is freshly minted and ready to download! You can also find it on iTunes, if that’s how you get your ChemPod fix.

Brian Shoichet from UCSF tells us how to use computer modelling to speed up the screening process for new drugs. Nature News’ Katharine Sanderson talks us through a very cool sounding tiny DNA machine that can measure the pH inside cells, and our very own Catherine Goodman reports on the recent ACS meeting.

But that’s not all – Stu pops up at the end to introduce a Nature Chemistry competition. This time we’re giving away goodie bags filled with posters, lab coats, t-shirts, yo-yos, etc – and even copies of the first issue. All you have to do is email your best chemistry limerick to podcast@nature.com – the best five will get the goodies!

Happy listening.

Neil

Neil Withers (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Reactions – Shana Kelley

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

I enrolled in university thinking I would end up in business, finance, or law, but once I got there, I found that science – chemistry in particular – was the subject I found most interesting. I found it concrete and logical, and the way that simple theories and laws explained complex phenomena really fascinated me. What really hooked me, though, was research. Once I got into a lab and started running my own experiments, I became captivated with the process of discovery and learning new things about molecular systems through experimentation.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

I can’t imagine a job better than the one I have now – it’s so multifacted and there’s always a new challenge. If I had to choose something else, I think it would be related to medicine. I find physiology fascinating, and I could see a career as a surgeon as leveraging some of the the same skills that I liked using in the lab, so maybe that’s where I would end up.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

We are working in a number of areas, but one of our current focuses is on a biomolecular detection platform that we are pushing very hard to make practical and relevant for use as a clinical diagnostic. I’d very much like to see the work my lab does have an impact outside of academic science and make its way into clinical medicine, so this is an area we’re investing quite a bit of effort in.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

Elizabeth I. She was a woman with so much power and responsibility at a time when women had so little. I’d be fascinated to hear about what it was like to walk in her shoes.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

Quite a while ago…..don’t want to get into the details, but it was a fiasco involving radioactivity and the cleanup of a pretty big mess because I was too distracted with all the demands of being an assistant professor to focus properly on an experiment. I realized then that it was time to get out of the lab and devote my attention to overseeing others’ research efforts. My group at the time wholeheartedly agreed and I think my current coworkers continue to prefer that I limit my lab activities to looking over their shoulders rather than making a mess in the lab!

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

That’s a tough one. One of my favorite books because of its chemistry link is The Periodic Table by Primo Levi, so it would be a front runner. My music tastes are pretty eclectic, so what I would take would depend heavily on my mood when I got shipped off for exile, but perhaps a nice long Mozart opera would end up making the trip with me.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

I’d like to hear from some of my chemist colleagues in Toronto – always interesting to hear more about what’s behind the science that people nearby are doing.

Shana Kelley is in the Department of Biochemistry at the University of Toronto, and works on nanomaterials-based biosensors and drug delivery systems.

SciFinder and the small screen

Oh, the joys of the World Wide Web…

If you have a few minutes to spare, liven up your Friday and check out these promotional videos (“”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_WoAR9GdCQ&feature=channel_page">The Party" and “”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEUXJ7ydpKI&feature=channel_page">The Paper") for SciFinder – make sure you watch them with the sound on.

The message seems to be that SciFinder will do wonders for your average college student – not only in terms of academic success, but also freeing up more time to do things that aren’t necessarily on the typical college curriculum…

Nice!

Stuart

Stuart Cantrill (Chief Editor, Nature Chemistry)

MRS: A good start

A nice, sunny afternoon in San Francisco, and my jet-lag seems to be under control. As it is my first time at the MRS, not to mention my first meeting as a Nature editor, not to mention my first attempt at blogging, I will try to keep this short and sweet. the meeting is of a manageable size (i.e. it doesn’t take half an hour to walk from one talk to the next), a big plus on my side.

There is plenty of interesting stuff to see. In particular a session on 3D architectures for energy storage: Debra Rolison talked about building batteries out of porous MnO2 networks, on which an electrolyte layer is then grown, and RuO2 anodes are deposited, which seems an intriguing idea.

Joanna Aizenberg showed nanorods which become humidity responsive when immersed in a polymer hydrogel, creating surfaces that can be hydrophilic in dry conditions, and superhydrophobic in wet conditions (when it rains?).

Another nice talk by Mike Crommie (of quantum corrals fame) was on STM studies of gated graphene, where he showed that shifting the gate voltage it is possible to image the presence of charge puddles on the sheet, and they are due likely to impurities trapped in the silica substrate.

Reactions – Ted Sargent

1. What made you want to be a chemist – or scientist/engineer in your case?

From an early age I loved applied physics – particularly the opportunity to solve a diverse range of application-oriented problems using a strikingly compact set of mathematical tools and physical ideas. And I grew up in town where III-V compound semiconductor quantum optoelectronics (quantum well lasers etc) was hot and exciting.

2. If you weren’t a chemist/scientist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

A dog walker. Fun to get outdoors and hang out with the dogs.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

(1) We are trying to break the solar energy compromise: today, solar cells are either efficient, or low-cost, but not both. We are working towards breaking the compromise by harvesting the sun’s full spectrum, including the infrared rays, using spectrally-tunable solution-processed colloidal quantum dots incorporated into photovoltaic devices.

(2) Working with chemist Prof. Shana Kelley, we are endeavouring to build chips that can detect a panel of nucleic acid biomarkers that are the harbingers of disease. We use a diverse range of nanostructures to display the molecular bait sequences; the Kelley team’s electrocatalytic reporter system to gain up the signal; and a merger of top-down lithography and bottom-up materials chemistry to integrate the nanostructures on chip. Together we are building low-cost, high-sensitivity, wide-dynamic range molecular detection systems.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

George Washington. The more I read about him, the more it becomes clear that he united practical brilliance with a lack of pretention. And I loved the fact that he clearly worried a lot – even despaired – yet triumphed. He was confident in himself without taking success for granted.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

Back when I was a grad student. Some of my last experiments involved lowish-temperature (30–250 K) measurements of lateral current injection laser current-voltage-light characteristics. Temperature turned out to be a power experimental degree of freedom that helped us elucidate the inner workings of this new class of devices.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

Book: New York Times: The Complete Front Pages: 1851-2008

Music Album: Glenn Gould – Bach – The Partitas, Preludes, Fugues & Fughettas

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

Harry Atwater and David Ginger – both astonishingly capable and versatile interdisciplinary fusions of {materials scientist – applied physicist – chemist – engineer}. In both cases I’d love to know how on earth they honed and fused so many remarkable talents and so much knowledge.

Ted Sargent is in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Toronto, and works on colloidal quantum dot photodetectors and photovoltaics, as well as multiplexed nucleic acids biosensors.

Outsell and InChIs

Having just launched Nature Chemistry we’re keeping a close eye on whenever we get a mention out there in cyberspace, so that we can get some idea of what the big wide world thinks about us.

One story that caught our eye was from Outsell, which, in their words, ‘is the only research and advisory firm focused on the publishing, information, and education industries’. The article was entitled ‘Chemical Bonding InChI by InChI’ and it offered an analysis of how certain publishers were making use of InChIs – those of you unfamiliar with InChIs can go here for a primer.

In addition to covering Project Prospect from the Royal Society of Chemistry, we here at Nature Chemistry also received some attention for how we are using InChIs and other chemical identifiers. Our friends over at ChemSpider also got a few mentions.

The article them moves on to consider whether CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service), which is owned by the ACS, will also embrace InChIs. The conclusion was that we may have to wait a while for that to happen.

So why do you need to know this? Well, the story from Outsell has been withdrawn (on April 8th) – and more than that, in fact, it has been removed from their archives (although the original story is cached on Google and you can find it here).

Whether it is right to completely remove every trace of a story that you withdraw is a discussion for another day – but now all that remains is a brief notice indicating that the original story did not hold up to Outsell’s internal standards.

Outsell now say that the original article wasn’t balanced and that the ‘tone of the piece could be taken to single out CAS as being late in responding to the trends’. Surely readers could make that judgement for themselves?

The great shame is that the whole article has simply been removed and an analysis of how cross-publisher development on an important topic such as the InChI – which may have a significant role to play in chemistry publishing – has been lost.


UPDATE on April 15: it appears that Outsell have now shortened their retraction notice to just say that they have removed the article – and include no reasons why. For further coverage in the blogosphere, see these pieces at ChemSpider, Depth-First and PMR’s blog.

Stuart

Stuart Cantrill (Chief Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Materials Girl: Say, what?

Posted on behalf of Materials Girl

I am trying something new this quarter – skipping class! But, not skipping class because I want to sleep in; even if I did do something so atrocious, it hardly would be beneficial to advertise on this blog. 😉

Instead, I am leaving the classroom to attend a conference for the first time! A friend has secured a [tiny] bit of funding to aid any undergrads attending the MRS spring meeting. Speaking of which, is it really necessary to charge students $160 to merely get through the door? It probably explains why only four of us are going (from the undergraduate Materials Science & Engineering department). Grad students at least tend to get funded by their advisors…

Given our very limited budgets, I’m not sure what the available scope of activities will be. However, I am nonetheless excited – especially after hearing of all the wondrous things from ACS! Now if only Nature Chemistry were around so I could nab an awesome shirt.

What types of happenings do you expect and seek out from conferences?

[Editor’s note: the editorial in issue 2 of Nature Chemistry will be about scientific conferences…]

Where does lithium come from?

How many lithium-ion batteries do you own? Let me see, I have one mobile/cell phone, one laptop, two digital cameras and one brick-like MP3 player (not to mention several old phones gathering dust somewhere) – they’re all rechargable, so the chances are they’re powered by lithium-ion batteries. So that’s at least 5. Multiply that by everyone in the developed world and you’ve got a lot of lithium.

But where does all that lithium come from? I must confess to having no idea. Then I came across the following article in The Daily Mail: In search of Lithium: The battle for the 3rd element. A lot of it is under a desert in Bolivia, and if we’re all “going to be driving electric cars in the future” (or, more realistically, using a lot more Li-ion batteries generally), it’s going to have to mined.

Although I can’t believe I’m linking to Daily Mail story in a serious way, the article is pretty good, and worth looking at the for the dramatic desert pictures alone. I shall also (grudgingly) applaud them for (a) covering science in this way and (b) explaining how lithium-ion batteries work – with a graphic.

Neil

Neil Withers (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)