The shameless annual Nobel Prize speculation post

At about this time next week, one member of the Nature Chemistry team will be breathing a sigh of relief, having just dashed off a few hundred words on the 2009 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. But which of us will be doing the writing? That all depends on who wins, which is probably the question most of you are more bothered about than our writing rota…

So who WILL win?? I’m happy to admit that I have absolutely no idea whatsoever. Even the guys at ISI Thomson Reuters get it wrong – or cover themselves by predicting about 15 winners. Last year, I suggested John Goodenough and, as he hasn’t won, I suppose I really should stick with him – which I’m happy to.

I thought one way of getting an overview of the blogospheres’ collective opinion was to tag cloud the text from three recent blog posts. OK, it’s not very scientific, but then who said awarding a stack of cash and a gold medal to a few people a year was?!

Hopefully the image will appear below:

<!—

begin tag cloud : generated by TagCrowd.com

Feel free to modify as long as you keep this notice.

This code and its rendered image are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

For commercial use licensing, visit https://tagcrowd.com/licensing.html

—>

created at TagCrowd.com

The tag cloud seems to reveal List, Gray and Zare with the largest names, with Gratzel hot on their heels – is this a sign? In the second sizing tier comes Whitesides, Moerner, Hartl and Horwich. It might be worth noting that ‘organic’ and ‘biology’ are both much larger than ‘palladium’. But then it might not. I tried to generate a cloud from the comments on the post, but they didn’t generate anything useful — no comment!

While I’m on the subject, our October editorial is all about the Nobel Prize, and it’s available here for free to all registered nature.com users. Here’s the intro: “The 2009 Nobel Prize in Chemistry will soon be awarded amid the usual speculation [that’s us, NW], angst, disagreement and elation — but is it really worth all the fuss?” Read the editorial, make your own minds up and let us know what you think.

Neil

Neil Withers (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Materials Girl: Upwards and onwards

Posted on behalf of Materials Girl

The day has arrived: fall quarter has begun and I am officially a grad student! I have long since left the comfort of teeming undergraduate dormitories and dining halls, in lieu of bare graduate apartments and my own kitchen. (Next step: avoiding frozen food and making time to cook up edible chemistry.) In the shiny new engineering building, there is a desk waiting for me alongside the other first years. Soon I shall take my research from the realm of theories & literature into that of wet-synthesis & laboratories! With my departmental transition from chemistry to Materials Science and Engineering (MSE), I am more of a “materials girl” than before.

My academic world will primarily consist of three categories: (1) graduate courses, (2) undergrad classes to TA, and — of course — (3) the everpresent job of scientific research.

1. My financial aid contract requires a full-time classload per 10-week quarter. So, I am enrolled in the obligatory [difficult] introductory MSE course, another on proposal writing, and slew of seminars. Nothing particularly new and exciting just yet.

2. To some, lecturing, presentations, grading, and all the works of teaching are trivial. To me, they are all important. With the undergraduate viewpoint still fresh (in which graduate students are expected to know everything and be available 24/7 to answer questions), I aspire to be one of those wonderfully enlightening, inspiring Teaching Assistants. Past experiences with terrible TAs make me wonder…

Deep down, there exists a nagging phobia that my chemistry-tuned background will be insufficient to support the inquiries of engineering students. The MSE class I will teach this term is a one of many core engineering requirements; statistics — and personal confessions — say that most of my students will be more concerned with lesser branches in the school of engineering. (Civil engineering? Who needs that?) How do quiet, calm, low-key individuals convey a passion for chemistry and materials science to students who don’t want to be there? (And contrary to what online ramblings may imply, in person I am quite verbally reserved.)

Any doubts aside, I am excited to wield power over undergrad— I mean, to teach. With my limited teaching/tutoring experience as aid, I can help cultivate minds and fend off requests for deadline extensions. We are the future!

3. Let’s just cross our fingers and hope for miracles. Or at least a stack of papers for Nature to publish. 😉

On a side note, it cannot be avoided that being a minority ensures that I stand out — even literally, as the department seems largely populated by short Asian males*. It’s not a bad thing, but I do wonder what judgments, expectations, and presuppositions await those with double X chromosomes.

*Let the record show that I am 1.68 m [= 5 ft 6 inches for those who like Imperial units and dislike mental arithmetic. NW], Vietnamese, and find it entirely appropriate to point out the common lack of great stature among my fellow Asians.

A flood of questions is before me: “what happened?”, “what now?”, “what am I doing?!”, “what if…”. Hopefully the journey will be more enjoyable than tedious (it’s already established that the road will be painful). For now, however, I must return to begging for fund— I mean, writing scholarship essays and proposals.

TBC

P.S.: My summer was spent doing little chemistry and a lot of art: throwing in a ceramics studio 8 hours a day, using an entire wall to paint a mural in my bedroom, and visiting museums. Should I feel guilty?

Reactions – Joost Reek

Joost Reek is in the Van ’t Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences at the University of Amsterdam, and works on the development of supramolecular approaches in transition metal catalysis.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

I was interested in physics, chemistry and some other technical subjects, but chemistry seemed to be the most attractive among these as it also contained some of the other aspects. Of course, good teachers at high school play an important role in this choice. Once at the university doing my master research project I was tremendously fascinated by fundamental research in chemistry.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be — and why?

If it is not supposed to be related to science at all, then maybe a designer, or maybe something that involves sports (professional trainer/coach would be interesting)

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

I am currently exploring chemistry on the border between transition metal catalysis and supramolecular chemistry. It brings about new solutions to standing problems, it provides new tools for catalyst recycling, combinatorial catalysis and we have recently developed a photocatalyst for the light-induced formation of molecular hydrogen (formed by assembly). By using tools that are also frequently used by Nature, such as site isolation by catalyst encapsulation, dinuclear and bifunctional catalysis, we can create catalysts that show unprecedented selectivity. Some of our approaches are impressively successful, and we have started two companies to explore the commercial potential. (cat-fix, InCatT). This is of course the ultimate test for the academic ideas!

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

Barack Obama! No doubt.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

When I started in Amsterdam in 1998, I still was doing experiments making porphyrin assemblies for transition metal catalysis and dendritic catalysts. Once I realized that it was no longer efficient to do the experiments myself, I reduced greatly the experimental work. I still do demonstration experiments, and the last time was in an old lecture hall of the tropen museum in Amsterdam, to celebrate the faculty’s birthday. It was great!

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

Only one music album is very old fashioned: we are the iPod generation! But it would be Californication from the Red Hot Chili Peppers. As a book I will bring From So Simple a Beginning: Darwin’s Four Great Books, introduced by E. O. Wilson.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

Whitesides, Lehn or Rebek would be great as they have done great science, but it would be also great to see some younger scientists as Otto, Glorius, Wenemers, Rowan, White, Ritter, Schenning, Sommerdijk, etc

Reactions – Laura Croft

Laura Croft is a Technical Editor for Nature Chemistry and Nature Chemical Biology and passed her PhD viva exam last week.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

I think it was my first copper sulfate crystallizing experiment at primary school and then a series of great teachers. Chemistry for me was the perfect mixture of creativity and problem solving. I was lucky to have two wonderful A-level teachers who recognized that this appealed to me and encouraged me to do extra chemistry lessons, then to apply to study chemistry at Oxford.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be — and why?

I would choose to do another creative job — I’d love to be an artist, architect or designer. I’m glad I kept art as a past-time but I’m still jealous every time I see one of the beautiful Nature Chemistry covers that our Art Editor designs. The other thing I love to do is cooking (it’s organic chemistry where you can eat your product!) so the dream scenario would be to design and run a restaurant!

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

I work for Nature Publishing Group as a Technical Editor, which involves adding extra features to research articles on our website. We are incorporating extra compound information pages, which are linked from bold compound numbers in the HTML and PDF of our articles, as well as highlighting chemical names in the text and linking these to free chemical databases. I hope that the use of these sorts of facilities continues to grow and that we can make improvements to the way that scientists access information, particularly spectroscopic data and experimental methods.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with — and why?

It would be interesting to have dinner with William Perkin who discovered and commercialized the dye mauveine. He was a chemist at a time when so much was still unknown about organic chemistry, but when it was so important for industry. Maybe I’d invite William Fox-Talbot and Johannes Vermeer too — I always wish I’d been around when knowledge of the chemistry of pigments and photographic techniques was so important for artistic and commercial ventures.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab — and what was it?

I vividly remember my last experiment in the lab as it was the last experiment of my PhD and it was only last December! I was trying to purify 1 mg of the final product of my total synthesis. After a nervous 15 minutes with a pipette column and a further few staring at the NMR machine I discovered I’d made the right compound — a very happy (and nerve-wracking) day.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

That’s a tricky one. I think I would have to make up some kind of “mix-tape” compilation album to suit all my moods, but you can be sure there would be some Stevie Wonder or Marvin Gaye in there. I’d probably take some historical fiction like a Tracy Chevalier novel with me or as a guilty pleasure the Harry Potter box set — that would waste a few hours.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions — and why?

Stuart Warren, as I — like many others who started there degrees in and after 2001 — learned much of the organic chemistry I know from the big green book!

A reprieve for Cp?

We’ve been following the story of element 112 and, like many others, have expressed surprise and/or dismay at the proposed name, copernicium, and symbol, Cp – those two letters having a place in many chemists’ hearts for the cyclopentadienyl ligand.

But wait! A letter in this week’s Nature (vol 461, p. 341) from Juris Meija, of the Canadian Institute for National Measurement Standards, suggests that there ‘could be a question mark hanging over’ the use of Cp for element 112.

And this is where it starts to get a little odd…it turns out that IUPAC rules forbid discoverers from proposing names that have previously been suggested and rejected for other elements. Although copernicium hasn’t been proposed for another element, the symbol Cp was associated with cassiopeium, a suggested name for what is now known as lutetium (which as all Asterix fans know, is named after the Latin word, Lutetia, for Paris). Extending the rule a short hop from names to symbols would therefore preclude the use of Cp.

So, rest easy, all those people concerned that they might get confused between the symbols for a widely used 5-carbon-ring ligand and a newly discovered artificial element of which a whole 3 atoms have ever existed on earth

Neil

Neil Withers (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Podcast, videos and more!

I just wanted to point you in the direction of some more chemistry offerings from NPG that have just hit the airwaves.

First up is the latest edition of the podcast – I’m sure it’s already popped in to your iTunes libraries, but for the few of you out there who don’t subscribe, you can visit our ChemPod homepage and feast upon the goodies there. The latest instalment includes an interview with Vince Rotello about his work that is featured on the cover of the September issue of Nature Chemistry as well as a studio chat with yours truly about my impressions of the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting that was held in Germany earlier in the summer. There are also segments about ripping electrons from molecules, DNA circuit boards and how best to store hydrogen if you want to use it as fuel in your car.

Second, the first two videos from our ‘Nobel reactions’ series from the aforementioned Lindau meeting are now available, and the remainder will be released over the coming few weeks. Keep an eye out for the conversations between the young researchers and Agre, Ernst & Tsien, and Schrock. These are freely available to view on our website.

Finally, just a quick note to let you know that former Sceptical Chymist blogger Retread now has his own blog – you can read his latest musings on the teaching of organic chemistry to medical students over there now.

Stuart

Stuart Cantrill (Chief Editor, Nature Chemistry)