Updating blogroll

We realised the other day that our list of links on the left-hand side is pretty out of date and hasn’t been updated in ages. So we put our heads together and scoured our RSS feeds in Google Reader (without which I doubt we’d be able to run about 30% of the content in the journal!) to come up with the following list of blogs to add:

Mad Scientists

ChemSpider blog

Chemistry Central

Curly Arrow

My Chemical Journey

A Chemical Sabbatical

A Giant Among Molecules

All That Matters (by our Nature Materials colleague Joerg Heber)

Khymos

ChemCafe

Chemical Crystallinity

Chemical Space

Chemistress

Chemjobber

Chiral Jones

Homunculus (from the science writer Phil Ball)

Infiniflux

Lamentations on Chemistry

Liberal Arts Chemistry

Metamodern (‘nano-guru’ Eric Drexler)

Noel O’Blog

Notes from the Giant’s Shoulders

Round bottom flask

Sabbatical Epistles

ScienceGeist

Solarsaddle (from UCL chemist Andrea Sella who writes the ‘Classic Kit’ column for Chemistry World)

Curious Chemistry Graduate

The unlikely grad student

TOC ROFL

Unbalanced reaction

NNNS chemistry blog

Entropic thoughts

Endless possibilities

ChemConnector

Periodic videos

Computational Organic Chemistry (Trinity University’s Steven M Bachrach, author of a book of the same name)

Science in the open

Nanoscale Views

Prof-like substance

Professor in training

Phew! My CTRL+C and CTRL+V fingers are burning. Let us know in the comments if there are any we’ve missed.

DISCLAIMER: Most, but not all, are chemistry blogs. Some are more general science/nano/new PI-flavoured, but none are downright off-topic. Most, but not all, are regularly updated, but all have at least been updated this year (that was the cut-off).

Neil

Neil Withers (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Reactions – Tony Coleman

Anthony W. Coleman, normally known as Tony, is in the Laboratory of Multimaterials and Interfaces in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of Lyon 1, France, and works on the use of calix[n]arenes to build non-covalent assemblies from nanocapsules to liposomes to nanoparticles and then through to macroscopic films.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

To sound horribly precocious at the tender age of nine I wanted to be a nuclear physicist. However, going to Huddersfield New College (in the North of England), I was lucky on two accounts: a superb chemistry teacher, Steven Mitchell, and the Nuffield Chemistry course. Both were inspiring — particularly the experimental bias of Nuffield; this, combined with the understanding of the mount of math in physics, converted me to chemistry.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

Wine importer! I actually worked part time during one of my post-docs in both retail and wholesale wine sales, enjoyed both, and was pretty good. Having stopped smoking some time ago, my palate has regained health so wines are coming through much better. But a major factor would be bringing really great world wines to France.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

Our major project at present concerns the use of calix[n]arene thin films for the capture and storage of various gases and volatile compounds. We see different types of specific behaviour depending on the calix[n]arene, and this allows us to start to differentiate between many compounds. Where will this lead — evidently explosive device detection, and for leakages of inflammable or toxic compounds, but the further we got into the project the more we also learnt about the economic impact of impurities in natural gas, so maybe we can reduce costs of things, such as glass, which use vast amounts of energy in their production processes.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

Charles the Second, the Restoration king. Witty, knowledgeable and a rake, he also found time to found the Royal Society and reform the Royal Navy. Having dinner with him should a pleasure, but my main reason for this would be to discuss the jacuzzi with him and explain its workings and possibilities to him. Imagine the effect on court cleanliness, but more importantly just think of the fun he would have.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

About two weeks ago, I am general handyman for our gas detection work. All the glassware and piping is at present at the prototype stage and I did all the design work. So when things go wrong either in the fluidics or the electronics my hands get dirty. In this case we set up the variable temperature system to get information on how we can detect gas in the field.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

For the book I would take “One Hundred Views of Edo” by the Japanese artist Hiroshige. Why — well I read rapidly so I would run through any textual book too quickly; hence a book of paintings and drawings and there I really like Japanese art and the work of Hiroshige. A painting a day or so and it is easy to go back and see new things. The album: A Pocketful of Stardust, the new best of Bridget St John. Bridget is a cult folk singer of the late sixties and seventies who recorded only four albums but whose voice and songs have always stayed with me. 2010 is here, year with issue of the BBC sessions and this album with such great music as Fly High and Bumper to Bumper.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

Helmut Ringsdorf. Helmut is the inspiration for many of us in the field of molecular assemblies. He is also a great and interesting speaker with a marvellous sense of humour. I have been lucky enough to share a table with him at a GRC and would very like to renew the experience with this great man who has also a great love of life and above all a wide knowledge of wine. Cheers.

Stop press

[This post is based on the editorial in the October issue — the full text can be accessed here, available for free to all registered users. We welcome feedback on our editorials in the comments section below.]

Press embargoes of research articles can serve journals, researchers and journalists — as long as everyone plays by, and understands, the rules.

No one likes to open the pages of their favourite chemistry journal and find that someone else has published the work that they are feverishly rushing to complete. Scientists have worried about being scooped since the time of Newton and Liebnitz, and probably before that too.

High-profile journals are notoriously as worried — if not more so — about being scooped as the researchers hoping to publish their work in them. But it’s not just other research groups that journals are looking over their shoulder for; they are also concerned that over-eager journalists may report the work before the peer-reviewed article has been published. Not only does this reduce the novelty and impact of the journal’s article, but it can lead to inaccurate reporting if journalists and their expert sources cannot see the paper in question.

This is one of the reasons why many journals have an embargo policy, releasing copies of their articles to journalists before they are due to be published. In return for this service, journalists agree to abide by an embargo: they will not publish their stories before an agreed time and date. This system has been in place for some time, but it is not without its critics; interested readers can follow the debate and keep up to date with broken embargoes at the Embargo Watch blog.

We routinely make our papers available to members of the press about a week before they are published. During this embargo period, authors are allowed — encouraged — to speak to any journalists who contact them. At other times before the publication date, however, this is discouraged and, as outlined below, could result in a paper not being published. Our policy states: “Material submitted to Nature journals must not be discussed with the media […]. We reserve the right to halt the consideration or publication of a paper if this condition is broken.”

Communicating with other scientists, through such mechanisms as conference presentations, preprint servers or departmental seminars, is not prohibited. The policy continues “Nature journals do not wish to hinder communication between scientists.” Of course, journalists may attend conferences or browse preprint servers and find stories that way. In these relatively rare cases, journalists have not agreed to any embargo and may therefore publish stories, but we ask that our authors do not discuss their work or seek to encourage premature publication.

Mainstream press coverage of science is often criticised for a number of perceived failings, a common one being an overreliance on press releases. But well-written and responsible press releases should act as a useful starting point on which journalists can base their own articles. The positive side of embargoes and press releases are that they can help to give journalists time to not only research topics they may not have covered before, but also crucially to canvass other experts in the area to present a balanced story.

Although the NPG embargo policy may seem harsh on first inspection, it is in place for good reasons and the appropriate use of accurate, embargoed press releases offers benefits to all parties — researchers, journalists and journals — alike.

One Heck of a prize

Well, the dust from yesterday’s Nobel Prize is settling – in case you haven’t heard, it went to Richard F. Heck, Ei-ichi Negishi and Akira Suzuki “for palladium-catalyzed cross couplings in organic synthesis”.

In case you haven’t also heard, there has been much rejoicing across the chemistry blogosphere. If you’ve only been reading more main-stream media and are somewhat confused what the prize has actually been given for – understandable given the uniformly fairly poor standard – try reading the coverage of Chemistry World, C&EN and Nature News. Fantastically vague reporting from the proper media include headlines like ‘Three professors share Nobel Prize in chemistry’ – informative!

I think the mood in the Nature Chemistry office reflected the general blogosphere: relief and happiness that (a) it was “real” chemistry and (b) extremely well-deserved. We’ll admit to being guilty of moaning in the past about the more biology-focused prizes – but can you blame us when people say things like “chemistry as an intellectual discipline looks, to the outsider at least, to have been largely solved” (from the Economist’s science and technology blog Babbage). This is the kind of image problem that prompted last year’s pre-Nobel editorial – what wins the Nobel prize matters because it’s pretty much the only glimpse of chemistry the wider world gets.

For our take on the prize, Laura wrote a Research Highlight. I think Stu summed it up best in the comment: “It’s the textbook example of a textbook reaction.”

Neil

Neil Withers (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Materials Girl: Year 2

[Posted on behalf of Materials Girl]

Skimming through some of my first posts as a graduate student, I noticed that I’m really whiny! For example, there’s the entry on writing fellowship applications: I gripe about physics, grades, writing personal statements, and generally having to work hard. Ah, youthful innocence – or shall I say, stress without merit. Thing is, I wasn’t even working hard compared to what I’m doing now (mostly in regards to research). Last fall, I spent months just to write a few essays and fill out application forms. This year, I’ve already done half the work in a week, and it is of higher quality. I think it’s part of the adaptation process for grad school. I’ve learned to work harder and faster, instead of wasting time feeling sorry for myself and ruing my ever-increasing workload. Well, I still do that – and more often than I’d like to admit. However, I’m trying to keep negativity to myself and channel my energy into being useful, even when it feels like I have zero energy to spend. Besides, if I push through and get STUFF done, I won’t have anything to whine about (and I won’t have to feel guilty for those hours spent on Hulu).

Grad school is teaching me everything that life asks for, even if I’m still in a little bubble away from the real world. Not only am I gaining academic knowledge and technical skills, but also how to best use them. That’s what school is for, right?

P.S.: My advisor finally started paying me! He also asked me to stay for a PhD, but I’d much rather pursue my doctorate in an exotic country far, far away. Or NorCal. (I hear the population at Berkeley is weird, whacky, and wonderful!)

Reactions – Eiichi Nakamura

Eiichi Nakamura is Professor of Physical Organic Chemistry in the Department of Chemistry, the University of Tokyo, and works on organic synthesis, physical chemistry and nanoscience.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

It is partly due to my father, Goro Nakamura, who was a mining engineer and showed me beautiful samples of minerals and inorganic crystals. It is partly due to my high school teacher, Hisao Fukuoka, who taught us not only chemistry but also the joy of mountain trekking and the beauty of wild flowers. Teachers in fine arts and music, Hiroya Shiroki and Ichiro Tada, taught me the joy of artistic activities – an essential supplement for my life as a chemist.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

I would have been an architect or a mechanical engineer because of my interest in constructing various objects such as HO steam locomotives from a brass sheet. Indeed, I have become a “molecular” architect.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

Exploring new fields for chemistry toward atomic dimension (electron microscopic study of individual molecules) and toward resolution of societal issues (utilization of ubiquitous elements for catalysis, industrialization of printable organic solar cells and gene delivery).

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

Alexander the Great in Babylon in 323 BC. During his journey to the East, he conceived a vision of unified Europe and Asia, and crossed the Indus in 326 BC. The influence of this historic event reached Japan several hundred years later. I would ask him what he has learned from Aristotle in his teens.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

My last experiment was in the second half of the 1980s when my Grignard solution reached the ceiling of the lab. I continued however my own computational experiments until the middle of the 1990s.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

I would probably bring a music score and a musical instrument, and enjoy playing music all the time rather than listening to someone’s recordings.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

Profs. Teruaki Mukaiyama and Gilbert Stork. They are the last giants who can tell us the early days of modern synthetic organic chemistry. They are my mentors.