Reactions – Lisa McElwee-White

Lisa McElwee-White is in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Florida, and works on applications of organometallic chemistry to problems in materials science, catalysis and synthetic methodology.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

My mother gave me science toys and took me to museum classes because she was frustrated that she couldn’t become a scientist. I loved playing with a chemistry set (completely unsupervised!) in the basement of my parents’ house. Once I got the chance to do undergraduate research at the beginning of my freshman year, I was hooked. I never considered majoring in anything else.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

I’d love to play in a major symphony orchestra but my skill level as a musician isn’t anywhere near that high. I’ll just have to keep my day job as a chemistry professor.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

We are working on several things: green chemistry methods for carbonylation, electrocatalysts for direct oxidation of alcohols in fuel cells, and design and synthesis of organometallic precursors for the chemical vapour deposition of inorganic thin films. All of these are interesting and important problems but I think our most distinctive work at the moment is in mechanism based design of CVD precursors. I would like to see our approach spread through the materials community, so that people think more like chemists when looking at deposition chemistry.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

Rosalind Franklin, because I’d like to hear the story from her side.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

I think it was in about 1987. I prepared a batch of (CO)5W(THF) as starting material for a student. I learned rapidly that my time as a faculty member was so fragmented that it was not possible to synthesize sensitive organometallic compounds and get the workup done before the material decomposed. My current generation of students can’t even conceive of me doing an experiment. They cringe when I touch things.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

The book would be something by Terry Pratchett, probably Good Omens. The album would be a tougher choice. Half of me would want something baroque, maybe one of the Interpreti Veniziani recordings of Vivaldi. The other half of me couldn’t give up my Springsteen albums so I might end up with my hands on Born to Run.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

Paul Wender. I’m dying to find out if he can answer a question within the 100 word limit.

Nobel reactions

Back in the height of summer, I found myself at the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting held in Germany on the shores of lake Constance. I was there as part of a film crew sent by Nature Publishing Group to capture conversations between the young researchers and Nobel Laureates – much in the same way as the physics-themed meeting was covered last year. The first of the chemistry films goes live in a few days time, but to whet your appetite, here is a trailer:

For more details about the meeting, you can also read my report (freely available) from the September issue of Nature Chemistry – which went live yesterday. The latest edition of the ChemPod will also go live in the next few days and you can hear me chatting with Mark Peplow about the Lindau experience and my thoughts about a change in career…!

Stuart

Stuart Cantrill (Chief Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Reactions – Scott Mabury

Scott Mabury is in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Toronto, and primarily works on the environmental fate, distribution and persistence of fluorinated chemicals.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

Growing up on a farm combined with a Mom who taught Junior High science, a great high school chemistry teacher in Potosi, Missouri (Bill Nelson) and topped off with a course called “environmental chemistry” at college probably capture most of the ‘what’.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

Either a brain researcher or a farmer though I actually do the latter one day a week now. Probably best to keep the farming job as the one I play at since the rewards are mostly psychic ones. I find the science of the human brain fascinating and extremely challenging.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

A number of interesting things, although exploring why humans are so contaminated with perfluorinated acids is particularly intriguing. Specifically, we synthesize various polyfluorinated phosphates, that are commonly used as food contact paper chemicals to impart water and oil repellency, to explore their reactive properties. We just published some work that showed we could measure ppb concentrations of these in human serum, thus we are specifically interested in their metabolic reactions and whether they are significant contributors to the body burden of PFOA and related perfluorinated acids. This involves live-animal metabolism studies along with more focused investigations of the reactive intermediates.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

Winston Churchill since I’ve taken on an additional job in university administration and successful leadership is on my mind.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

Probably not since my early years as an assistant professor though I love designing experiments. I do note we are doing a largish field experiment now on the fate of food contact paper chemicals in an agroecosystem. This has me riding my John Deere tractor disking 600 tons of paper sludge on to 20 acres, on my farm, and then planting it into soybeans. I have an undergrad research student who follows along obtaining and ultimately analyzing the samples. My experimental contributions are not so scientific but they are necessary to the experiment.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

Like publishing research, quality is more important than quantity but quantity still matters (especially on a desert island) so I would bring War and Peace. Harder pick for music so perhaps some Led Zeppelin would go well with Tolstoy.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

Wow, this is harder than I would have thought as there are so many. Perhaps Mario Molina or Sherwood Rowland as they are scientific heroes of mine and I be interested seeing their personas fleshed out.

ACS: Organic highlights

I’ve spent the majority of my time in the organic sessions here at the ACS meeting, and the standout highlights have to be the Young Academic Investigators on Monday and the Arthur C. Cope award scholars symposium yesterday. In the first of these I particularly enjoyed talks by Richmond Sarpong and Chris Vanderwal who both spoke on uses of pyridines in natural product synthesis – although from very different perspectives.

Richmond described synthetic efforts towards a number of heterocyclic products from a common bromomethoxypicoline; readers with a JACS subscription can read about it here. While the structure of the original pyridine is fairly well intact in Richmond’s final products, this could not be further from the truth for Chris who spends his time ripping pyridine rings open using the Zincke reaction, more details here.

Moving on to the Cope scholars, Paul Chirik‘s description of what he calls Modern Alchemy – essentially looking at how to use cheaper and abundant metals for catalysis was very entertaining. Apparently, if you need to explain to your mother why an iron catalyst might be better than a platinum one, then tell her that ’the price of stamps (self-adhesive) would increase by 5% per year because of the cost of platinum which can’t be recovered from the glue.’ Other highlights included Bill Jones dancing around the stage explaining the precession of a coordinated rhodium species around an aromatic ring, and Erik Sorensen’s description of the rapid construction of complex molecules such as the natural product (+)-FR182877

While looking up the last link, I couldn’t help noticing that Erik published this work with none other than Chris Vanderwal, and it leads me to this final thought: How many of the presenters in the young investigators session will appear in the Cope award scholars symposium at later ACS meetings and which future young investigators are they currently training?

Steve

Stephen Davey (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)

ACS: Afternoon with the chain gang

I’m not sure why, but the polymer sessions at ACS meetings always seem to be in venues away from the main conference centre. What do polymer chemists make of this, I wonder? Do they feel that they’re being hived off for some reason? Or do they actually quite like having a venue more or less to themselves? If there are any polymer people out there that would like to comment on this, I’d love to know.

A sense of direction was never my strongest point, and so it was that I got lost on the way to the hotel where the polymer talks were being held (which was embarrassing, because the hotel is just around the corner from the Washington Conference Center). Arriving with seconds to spare, I found that someone had seriously miscalculated the size of the room needed for the afternoon session. As the chairperson, Craig Hawker, commented, “This is the smallest lecture room Bob Grubbs will ever lecture in.” People were spilling out into the corridor, the air-con couldn’t cope, and frankly I wasn’t sure I’d be able to stick it out for long.

Fortunately, a swap was arranged with another session, providing us with a room three times the size of the original one, which we instantly filled. More chairs were brought in, but by the end of the afternoon it was still standing room only.

So why all the interest? Because it was a stellar line-up. Not just the aforementioned Bob Grubbs, but also Krysztof Matyjaszewski, Dave Bergbreiter and Karen Wooley, to name but a few. There was too much good stuff to cover here, but I liked Rachel O’Reilly’s work making metal-lined nanocages (Soft Matter subscribers can read about this here); Craig Hawker’s description of reactive polymers that have ketenes in their side-chains, which can be used for cross-linking or functionalization (the polymers can be used for microcontact printing applications); and Karen Wooley’s tour de force about nanoparticles that carry DNA plasmids into cells (Biomaterials subscribers can see some of this work here). Karen is currently using nanostructures as building blocks for complex molecular assemblies, for example by decorating anionic nanocylinders with cationic nanospheres; the anionic cylinders won’t enter cells, but they can do when coated with the cationic spheres. She’s ultimately hoping that her nanostructures will be useful for therapies targeting lung injuries.

I have to say that this was my favourite session of the meeting so far – the science was great, but there was also a genuine sense of camaraderie among the people in the room, with lots of interest in each talk demonstrated by the number of questions asked. Which made up for the fact that I got lost again on the way back to my hotel…

Andy

Andrew Mitchinson (Senior Editor, Nature)

ACS: Nanopower

There’s so much good stuff going on at the ACS meeting that it’s tough finding time to blog, so here I am catching up on yesterday’s talks. Let’s kick off by talking about a brilliant session on inorganic nanochemistry. Zhong Lin Wang described his work with piezoelectric ZnO nanowires, especially looking at how they can be used to make nanogenerators for powering devices. One of the latest developments is a widget that produces an oscillating current as it flexes, effectively acting as an AC generator – Nature Nanotechnology subscribers can read a paper about this here. Zhong Lin wowed the audience by showing how such devices could be built into a jacket for a hamster; when the hamster went for a run in its wheel, the animal’s movement generated electricity! (Nano Letters subscribers can see this here.)

Equally impressive was Yi Cui’s talk about the use of nanostructured surfaces for making efficient photovoltaic devices. By making solar cells lined with nanocones or nanodomes of silicon, the energy density of the cells reaches 17.5 mA per square centimetre – which according to Yi is “world-beating”. The silicon nanocones are better at trapping light than films of amorphous silicon, absorb light across a range of wavelengths (Yi showed data spanning 400 to 800 nanometres), and also efficiently absorb light that strikes the cell obliquely. I was particularly struck by pictures that compared amorphous silicon with the nanostructured stuff – amorphous silicon is grey, whereas the nanocone material is totally black, thus providing a simple demonstration of light absorption properties that even I could understand!

There was lots of other cool stuff (including a tantalizing mention from Yi about nanoribbon topological insulators that should solve a fundamental problem in spintronics, manuscript currently in press), but now I really want to say something about polymers (see my next blog entry)…

Andy

Andrew Mitchinson (Senior Editor, Nature)

ACS: Beginning to see the light

Have you ever wondered how you would evacuate several thousand people from a hangar-sized conference centre in the event of a fire? Well, now I know, because all the fire alarms went off yesterday morning at the Washington Conference Center. I’m pleased to report that there was no mad panic (chemists, of all people, know how to respond to fire-related emergencies) but it has to be said that it does take a long time – the all-clear had been sounded before I made it to the exit. It turned out to be a false alarm, by the way.

I felt sorry for the poor speakers who were interrupted mid-flow by sirens and flashing lights, but an honourable mention must go to the presenter at the session that I was attending: Malika Jeffries-EL handled the interruption with magnificent aplomb. And everybody came back to see the rest of her talk – about the synthesis of benzobisazoles as building blocks for conjugated polymers – once the alarm was over.

Later in the same session, Tehshik Yoon spoke about his work on visible-light-driven photochemical reactions, specifically [2+2] cycloadditions. The key to using visible light for these reactions is the ruthenium catalyst; JACS subscribers can read about some of this work here, in a paper that describes intermolecular cycloadditions. Yoon has now tweaked the chemistry so that it works in crossed intermolecular reactions, and that work is currently in press.

I wonder if visible-light-driven reactions might become something of a theme for the future, as David MacMillan is, of course, also working in this field. He spoke about the development of his photoreactions for the asymmetric alkylation of aldehydes (Science subscribers can read the first paper on this topic here). The latest development in this story will undoubtedly be of interest to medicinal chemists: a method for the trifluoromethylation of aldehydes, which is currently in press.

News from today’s sessions later…

Andy

Andrew Mitchinson (Senior Editor, Nature)

ACS: Open to ideas

It’s the first day of the ACS meeting in a bakingly hot Washington DC, so I decided to dip my toes into the cool waters of chemoinformatics. One of my favourite talks was by Jean-Claude Bradley, who provided an update on his work using open notebooks. Jean-Claude points out that one of the advantages of Open Data is the way that it allows quick validation of results – because there’s no filtering of the data, then it’s easy for anyone to scrutinize any unusual observations. What’s more, if your data disagree with someone else’s, then it’s possible to work out what might have been done differently, potentially leading to useful new discoveries along the way.

I also quite liked his use of crowdsourcing as a way of amassing lots of data. He’s currently interested in accumulating solubility data, so he’s found some nice ways of getting people around the world to help provide it. For example, one undergraduate lab asks its students to generate solubility data as a practical assignment; the data is then passed on to Jean-Claude’s group for his project. What better way to motivate students in their practical work than by giving them an assignment that generates useful new information?

So I came away from the session thinking anew about the whole Open Data concept. What do you think about it?

Andy

Andrew Mitchinson (Senior Editor, Nature)

ACS: Pressurized preservation

So, here I am in Washington DC for the fall 2009 meeting of the ACS. This is my first time in DC, so I arrived a day early to fit some touristy activities into my schedule – first stop a photo of The White House from as close as I could get (which in case you didn’t know is a long way away…).

I then went to see the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights at the National Archives – and here’s a chemistry fact for you – they’re kept under pressurized helium. Now these are very important documents, and I’m not surprised to find that an inert atmosphere is used, but I did wonder about why helium was used instead of argon? Argon would probably be the synthetic chemist’s choice for an inert gas, particularly as it’s density makes it easier to work with, and as far as I know it’s cheaper as well.

My final stop yesterday was the Smithsonian museum of American History. Being a bit of a science geek, I was surprised to find and immediately headed for the Science in American Life exhibit which is currently running – so if you have a gap in your schedule or, dare I say it, are sloping off from the sessions at the ACS, I can highly recommend it.

Steve

Stephen Davey (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Reactions – George Stanley

George Stanley is in the Department of Chemistry at Louisiana State University, and works on developing new homogeneous bimetallic catalysts and catalytic processes.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

I became fascinated with science in the 4th grade (1962) when I read the Disney book Our Friend the Atom, followed by a large number of other science books in my small town’s library. I got a chemistry set a year later and started playing around with standard “cook-book” reactions that progressed into preparing my own flash and smoke powder mixtures for fireworks. My school asked us every year what we wanted to be when we grew up and from 4th grade through 11th grade I said nuclear physicist. Taking calculus in my senior year in high school made me realize that I did not have the math abilities to be a physicist, so I “dropped down” to chemistry, which I was enjoying more and more.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

My first choice would be science teacher in a primary/secondary school setting. I am a gifted, enthusiastic teacher and have a broad love of science. I see a high fraction of students in primary and secondary schools here in the USA not getting good general science educations because their teachers do not have much appreciation or understanding of science. Unfortunately, there are very few hands-on science activities in most schools nor connections to everyday real life. If I had to get away from science or teaching, I would be interested in a business career. I have always been interested in business topics and have worked in a small-town pharmacy, a zinc refinery, and a steel mill. I have seen how poor management decisions have led to a company’s decay and eventual closing (long before our current economic situation).

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

Our newest project is developing transition-metal catalysts for alkene hydration, which is the reaction of alkenes with water to produce linear alcohols or other oxygen-containing products. There are no examples of this for unactivated alkenes and Dr. James Roth, discoverer of the Monsanto Acetic Acid process, has called alkene hydration catalysis one of the 10 unsolved problems of industrial catalysis. We submitted a “blue-sky” (i.e., no preliminary results) proposal to Sasol North America and they took a big chance and funded this exploratory project. Although we are still in the early stages of studying this, we believe that we have indeed catalyzed a reaction between water and simple 1-alkenes under mild conditions. But the situation, naturally, turns out to be complicated with alkene oligomerization taking over to give a completely unexpected primary product.

As to where we would like to see this lead? A practical and environmentally friendly industrial catalyst would be fantastic. It is very rare, however, for academically discovered catalysts to make the transition to industrial commodity chemicals, so we are very realistic about this.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

Tough question! Ben Franklin would be my choice (without a lot of deep thinking). I grew up in eastern PA and visited the Franklin Institute, a wonderful science museum in Philadelphia, many times as a kid. Ben Franklin was a remarkable person: scientist, politician, businessman, diplomat, and bon vivant. As a scientist I would like his insight into the politics that went on for the Declaration of Independence and thoughts on the constitution and the compromises involved, especially with regards to the second amendment (“right to bear arms”) as it relates to the USA today.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

Last week! Although I don’t do synthesis anymore, I do help out with our in situ catalyst spectroscopic studies (FT-IR & NMR) and when new autoclave runs are being done. I helped one graduate student condense and transfer butadiene to an autoclave for a hydroformylation run; another with setting up an ethylene hydroformylation experiment; and a senior student with a FT-IR study using a new silicon crystal attenuated total reflectance reaction cell. At US$660 per crystal, I usually mount and dismount the crystal in the cell for reaction studies and cleaning.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

Book: either The Glory and the Dream: A Narrative History of America, 1932-1972 by William Manchester or the Boy Scout Manual. The Boy Scout Manual if survival looked difficult, otherwise the Glory and the Dream as a thick and engaging history of the USA during some remarkable times.

Music: Hmmm – batteries wouldn’t last long (solar power?), Best of the Moody Blues ranks as one of my favourite groups and I don’t get tired of listening to them.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

Margaret Cavanaugh (National Science Foundation – National Science Board). Marge was my NSF program director a long time ago and had a very positive impact on my career. I haven’t had a chance to talk to her much over the last 10 years as she has moved away from chemistry. Marge has been in both academics (chemistry professor) and involved in high level NSF activities. I’d like to keep her thinking about chemistry and Reactions might help.