Blogroll: Space dinosaurs!

Highly respected organic chemist publishes a Perspective in JACS, chaos ensues.

Ronald Breslow — past president of the ACS and Priestley medallist in 1999 — is a “well-respected research lion”, in the words of SeeArOh at Just Like Cooking. Few would dispute his place in the chemistry firmament. With many achievements behind him, surely he has earned the right to close a Perspective article in JACS on the possible origin of homochirality in biological molecules with a chuckle — suggesting that humans would be better off not meeting the advanced dinosaurs, with amino acids of the opposite chirality, who may populate distant corners of the universe!

Apparently not. At least, not according to some of the dinosaur-focused bloggers/newshounds out there — such as Dinosaur Tracking or Discovery. In their defence, however, they were reacting to the press briefing that the ACS somewhat mystifyingly released. It was mystifying because it ignored the six pages of discussion about the origin of chirality of amino acids to focus on the last two ‘space dino’ sentences.

The combination of Breslow and space dinos proved tempting for some chemistry bloggers, with SeeArrOh covering the paper and its final words in the good-humoured tone in which they were surely intended. Paul Bracher, who blogs at ChemBark, has worked in the origin-of-life field, and actually discussed the scientific content of the paper — how refreshing! But Bracher certainly doesn’t mince his words giving his opinion of the ACS press office.

The final twist in the dinosaur’s tale came in the comments on Just Like Cooking and ChemBark: hasn’t Breslow written something quite similar in Tetrahedron Letters and the Israel Journal of Chemistry? The similarity is such that, at the time of writing, JACS has removed the paper from its website, citing copyright concerns.

[As mentioned in this post, we’re posting the monthly blogroll column here on the Sceptical Chymist. This is June’s article]

Reactions: Tiberiu Moga

Tiberiu Moga is an undergraduate student in Medical Education at the University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, studying to complete a medical degree — and is also one of the winners of our In Your Element essay competition (we’ll be featuring the winners on Reactions over the coming months).

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

In some ways, chemistry chose me and not the other way around. As an undergraduate, I was drawn to chemistry because it allows one to understand life on the most fundamental (i.e. atomic) level. By understanding medicine at the molecular level, one can develop creative new approaches to treating and curing diseases, ultimately saving lives. I have also had good professors (in chronological order: P.A. Jacobi, R.B. Grubbs, R.P. Hughes, F.J. Kull (senior and junior), D.S. Glueck, G. Gribble, J.E.G. Lipson, J.S. Winn, E.V. Pletneva, D. Wilcox and R.S. Cantor) who challenged me to do my best and nurtured my passion for chemistry.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

If I could not study chemistry, I would probably study the Classics, with a focus on ancient Greek and Roman history. I took Latin in high school and have always been fascinated to learn more about the ancient world.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

At the moment, I’m taking a break from doing research to study medicine. If I chose a career in academic medicine, I hope the knowledge of chemistry I have gained will help me develop new therapies for currently intractable diseases. If not, at least chemistry will allow me to understand the mechanisms of action of the medicines I prescribe.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

Given the choice, I would like to have dinner with Hippocrates, in order to better understand medicine in his day.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

My most recent experiment was in the summer of 2011. For that experiment, I was trying to determine the effects of different compounds on the molecular biology of brain tumors.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

If exiled to a desert island, I would take History of the Peloponnesian War by Thucydides as my one book. As for the music album, it would probably be a selection of music by Mozart.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

My preference would be to see Robert H. Grubbs (2005 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry) interviewed on Reactions. When I was an undergraduate at Dartmouth College, he came once to give a lecture about his research but I could not attend due to a time conflict. I sorely regretted missing that talk as I would later go on to study the very subjects he discussed. His son, Robert B. Grubbs (future Nobel Laureate in Chemistry?), was also one of my undergraduate chemistry professors and inspired me to study chemistry further, to the point of completing a Bachelor of Arts in the subject.

A new focal point for industry-academia networking

A guest post from Professor Joe Sweeney at the University of Huddersfield.

—————–

Anyone who is watching the slow-motion train wreck that is the Eurozone can see that we are in trouble. ‘National emergency’-type trouble. Scientists have a really good track-record at delivering useful products and processes in times of crisis; when push comes to shove, we can usually get our act together to tackle science-amenable problems of national or global importance. Think Manhattan Project. Think NASA. Think about the enormous strength of UK chemistry in the latter half of the 20th century, based to a great extent upon the post-war momentum generated by scientists who had worked for the cause (Derek Barton was a member of a secret wartime research team working on invisible inks for skin). Allegedly.

So it’s no surprise that academic scientists are being urged to Do Their Bit to get us out of the unique mess that we appear to be in. The question is: how? How can we effectively harness the creativity of academic scientists to bring innovation-led impact to the commercial environment? Well it turns out the Royal Society have been doing it for years. The Industry Fellowship scheme (funded by RCUK and industry sponsors such as AstraZeneca, BP and Rolls-Royce) allows academics to spend up to two years working within an industrial research environment, on a project of the applicant’s choosing. There is also the possibility of an industrial collaborator doing a reverse secondment and spending time in the university environment.

The Royal Society Industrial Fellowship (RSIF) scheme has been operating for more than 30 years and it is a class-leading vertical tech transfer mechanism (as they say in the trade, apparently), but it has a relatively low profile (go on, admit it: you’ve never heard of it have you?) outside the direct beneficiaries of the scheme. Well all that is about to change; on 3 May this year, the RS held the inaugural RSIF Network Event to kick-start a new plan for maximizing the impact of the IF scheme. Using the class-leading tech transfer, collaborative understanding and networking skills generated, we will provide a focal point for redesigning the academia-industry interface so that it is fit-for-purpose for the challenges of the 21st century.

The launch event is the start of a whole range of networking activities to engage academics with industry partners, to create, nurture and refine research partnerships to tackle problems demanding both cutting-edge science and commercial acumen. The RSIF Network will be driven by a college of Industrial Fellows — comprised of current and ex-alumni — and it will use the power of contemporary e-networking to give a new perspective to a well-known (and, in some quarters, much-derided) interface. Anyone interested in collaborative research can climb aboard by contacting the Royal Society, or by dropping a comment below. Collaborations just got even more interesting…

Reactions: Mark Thiemens

Mark Thiemens is Dean of the Division of Physical Sciences and Distinguished Professor of Chemistry at the University of California, San Diego, and works on studies of the physical chemistry of mass independent isotope effects and their observation in nature

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

I was deeply interested in understanding basic chemistry and physics and in using this fundamental knowledge to understand nature in a large way. In the best of all possible worlds, the research would involve field work that utilizes field measurements and application of new chemical principles to better understand nature . I have been fortunate in that our study of basic physical chemical laws of isotope effects has allowed me to work at the South Pole, Greenland Summit, Tibetan Himalayas, rain forests in South America and South East Asia as well as to collect samples from ships in the major oceans, and to fly rockets and balloons for atmospheric sampling. Analysis of meteorites and lunar samples for solar system evolutionary studies has added an extra-terrestrial component to my “field work”.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

If I wasn’t a chemist I wouldn’t stray too far away, and would likely be a pure geochemist or physicist instead.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

Projects in the laboratory at present include collection and analysis of samples from a snow pit in the Antarctic to study temporal changes in the oxidation state of the planet over time, extraction of water from meteorites and Mars samples to understand the origin and evolution of water in the solar system, detection of atmospheric radioactive 35S to detail the situation at Fukushima and use the emissions to clock long range transportation of aerosols across the Pacific Ocean, measurement of the oxygen isotopic composition of the solar wind from the return samples of the Genesis mission, theoretical understanding of the physical chemistry of photodissociation of molecular nitrogen and CO, and experimental isotopic studies of the early process of gas to particle formation at the earliest stage of the solar system formation.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

This was very hard to answer. Ultimately I chose Thomas Jefferson, an interest that dates back to my visit to Monticello as a teenager. I was deeply impressed with his studies of science, which range from meteorology, to geology and paleontology, interest in meteorites (such as the Weston meteorite and the associated controversy), and his meticulous notes on nature, which includes chemically related phenomena. As an educator, his central role in the founding of the University of Virginia and working on the new curricula, and architecturally designing the Rotunda is unprecedented. If one throws in his composition of the Declaration of Independence, and the fact that that he was the only President who was a scientist, there likely would be no lack of conversation over dinner. To quote President Kennedy when hosting a dinner for a number of Nobel Laureates at the White House “I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered at the White House – with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone”.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

Last summer I prepared a set of samples for short UV photolysis of metals to investigate photochemical isotope effects and to resolve potential isotope effects associated with different nuclear properties.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

For the book, I am pilfering a comment of my son Max who suggested that a first rate astronomy book would allow me to study the stars and their migrations every night and to really learn the night sky. For an album, I would find an album of Mozart that begins with his first symphonic composition and ends with his last to allow me to enjoy the complexity of the individual pieces as well as the evolution through his life.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

I am afraid to answer this because I would leave out the many other chemists that I would like to see interviewed.

Reactions: Kurt Gothelf

Kurt Gothelf is in the Department of Chemistry and iNANO at Aarhus University, where he is conducting research in DNA programmed self-assembly of molecules and nanomaterials.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

I had a wonderful chemistry teacher in high school, who inspired me to study chemistry at the university. I spent my third year at Heidelberg University, Germany, where I had my first research related organic chemistry laboratory experience. This ignited a very strong passion for organic chemistry and soon I decided to pursue a research career.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

In high school I was very much in doubt whether to pursue a trumpet or a chemistry career. Maybe it was lack of self-confidence, but I rationalized that if things didn’t turn out that well, it would be better to be an average professional chemist who plays trumpet as an amateur rather than vice versa. I have fortunately never regretted my choice and today I still play the trumpet – as an amateur.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

We are working with the so-called DNA origami method, where a long single stranded DNA sequence can hybridize with hundreds of short synthetic DNA sequences to form arbitrary structures. This method gives scientists a unique tool to form well-defined nanoscale-structures and to position other materials in a well-defined geometry relative to each other. In this context we are working on creating electronically conductive paths on such origami templates and to find new methods for arranging proteins, dendrimers and polymers on origami structures. Although origami structures are scientifically and aesthetically fascinating in themselves, it is my aim to develop this technology into real life application in medicine, diagnostics and electronics.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

Aristotle. I have always admired the Greek philosophers and how they shaped the foundation of modern thinking and, for Aristotle in particular, the physical sciences.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

Although I loved doing experimental work earlier on I have not been able to find time to do any experiments myself since I became the leader of the Centre for DNA Nanotechnology. The last time I performed experiments in the lab, I made some lanthanide complexes.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

The book should definitely be Biochemistry by Stryer et al. Then I would finally have time to read that book in depth – something that has been on my “to do” list for a long time.

The music album would be The Valkyrie by Richard Wagner, which is the all time favorite of mine, but there are many other classic, jazz and rock albums that I would also like to bring.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

Hanadi Sleiman from McGill University. She works in my field and has an interesting background.

The four worlds of carbon

Our element of the month is carbon. Carbon is so ubiquitous, with its various allotropes and as part of the many, many compounds and living organisms it makes up, that it’s hard to know where to start. Well, why not in New York City? As Simon Friedman from the University of Missouri Kansas City — interviewed here in Reactions — puts it in his article (subscription required) “The organic chemist’s view of carbon can be like the New Yorker’s view of the world, which to them ends at the edge of Manhattan.” And so he goes on to explain.

The first world of carbon is undeniably organic chemistry, with the incredibly varied species — such as drugs, pesticides, dyes — that it endeavours to synthesize. Yet beside the undisputed, elegant role carbon assumes in organic chemistry, it is also a key component of steel. It is true that iron is by itself a useful material, but it is carbon doping that converts it into steel, an altogether much stronger, much more durable material that can be used to build robust structures. Read Friedman’s article to find out how carbon atoms achieve this.

Another world of carbon — also related to materials and their bulk properties — that has become an inherent part of our lives is plastic. It’s hard to fully grasp just how omnipresent plastics are, from invaluable and advanced items (for example, lenses implanted within the eye) to an unfortunate mountain of junk items filling up landfill sites and even covering a vast area of the Pacific Ocean. Some forms of carbon really are forever, or close enough that we must think carefully about whether this is a good thing or not before (over)using them.

Finally, the last thing you can do with your carbon-based molecules is burn them for energy. We’ve been relying on oil, coal and natural gas for energy — yet in terms of usage of carbon this is more than a little upsetting. I particularly like how Friedman expresses this sentiment: “to the organic chemist, simply burning carbon for its energy must surely be akin to burning your books when you are cold, or eating next year’s seeds when you are hungry”.

Anne

 

Anne Pichon (Associate Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Blogroll: Arnie and artemisinin

A chemist who wants to terminate malaria and a calculation to have at your fingertips.

“Malaria. I hate this parasite. I want to kill it.” Imagine these words spoken in a voice similar to Arnold Schwarzenegger’s and you’ll understand why they nearly made Karl Collins fall off his chair, as he explained in a post at A Retrosynthetic Life. Of course, it wasn’t Arnie speaking, but Peter Seeberger of the Max Planck Institute, who discussed his efficient and cheap route to making artemisinin. Seeberger’s development means that “artemisinin factories the size of large cardboard boxes can be made for £10,000”. Overall, the cost of producing this potent antimalarial could fall to “10% of what it is today” — this might go some way to explain why Seeberger’s next appointments were with the UN and the Gates Foundation. Collins explains more about Seeberger’s career in his blogpost and you can read the Angewandte Chemie paper that reports the continuous flow synthesis via https://doi.org/c55rks.

“By the time you finish this sentence, your fingernails will have grown one nanometre.” If you read that sentence with some scepticism, you’re not alone. Zen Faulkes, who blogs at Neurodojo, asked “Is that accurate?”. To start with, his students did some guesstimations, ‘Fermi problem’ style, that showed it might be true, but like any good scientist, Faulkes wanted data. So he measured the growth rate of his fingernails using callipers accurate to 0.01 mm. After five or six measurements on ten fingers he arrived at an average fingernail growth rate of 0.92 nm per second! But wait — Faulkes went a step further and discovered it took him about 3.77 seconds to read that sentence, so his fingernails would have grown a whopping 3.47 nm. Interested readers may like to tackle the problem posed in the comments: How many moles of β-keratin are deposited onto the nail per second?

[As mentioned in this post, we’re posting the monthly blogroll column here on the Sceptical Chymist. This is May’s article]

Reactions: Russell Morris

Russell Morris is in the EaStChem School of Chemistry at the University of St Andrews and works on the synthesis and characterisation of porous materials such as metal organic frameworks and zeolites, and their applications in medicine and industry.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

I have no idea! When I was young I wanted to be a scientist but it was musical chairs as to what flavour of scientist I wanted to be. One week it was an astronomer, the next it would be a palaeontologist or a neurosurgeon and so on. Of course in secondary school I had an inspiring chemistry teacher and he shuffled me in the direction of Chemistry as my first choice for University and I have never looked back. Basically science is interesting, fun and creative – what more could you want?

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

Something physical and outside would be good.  Having said above that I always wanted to be a scientist my alter ego dreamed of being a professional sportsman, and it would be great to play rugby for Wales.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

Lots of things, from the use of ionic liquids in the synthesis of different materials to the disassembly and reassembly of zeolites, which I hope will lead to new materials that we cannot prepare right now. In terms of more immediate applications we are preparing porous materials for the delivery of medically active gases, and we are well on the way to developing real therapies for various diseases based on this technology.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

I like the idea of a lone genius fighting against the conventional wisdom. So I would like to invite someone like Galileo to dinner.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

Actually only a couple of months ago, checking the hydrothermal stability of a catalyst (it wasn’t very stable!).

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

Now this is the really difficult question. One book? I think it should be something pretty useful – 101 Gourmet Meals from Coconuts would be ideal but I don’t suppose it has been written. In that case I’ll go for a book where I will learn something – A History of the World in 100 Object by Neil MacGregor would fit the bill. As for music, that’s easy, I’ll take Queen Live at Wembley Stadium.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions – and why?

Mmm, a big choice of interesting chemists out there. I think either Stacey Zones from Chevron in the US or Susumu Kitagawa from Kyoto would be good interviewees.