Blogroll: Sharing your science

Editor’s note: As we continue to invite bloggers out there in the wild to compose our monthly Blogroll column, Chad Jones penned the October 2013 column.

———-

Informal chemistry review articles are a great way to spread the passion you have for your research.

Hours and hours spent in the lab with no results. Finally there’s a spike in the spectrum, a precipitate forms, or a colour changes; you’ve got a result to be proud of, and all of that hard work pays off when you share what you’ve found with your peers. Whether at a conference, in a peer-reviewed journal, or at a seminar, it’s important to communicate the science you’re passionate about.

These formal settings are usually what come to mind for sharing your research, but a new blog initiative by Andrew Bissette may also be worth your time. Bissette, who hosts #chemclub on Twitter and posts round-ups on his blog, has begun posting an informal review article each month. The first two posts were his own, on protcells and the Pummerer reaction, but since then he has invited others to fill the space with subjects they’re familiar with. JesstheChemist, who blogs at The Organic Solution wrote a great review about fluorinated drugs.

#Chemclub Reviews is a new project, but it’s a good idea and it will be interesting to watch it develop. Informal short reviews like these are a great way of telling the online chemistry community about the area you work in — a community that is very willing to listen and give relevant input. Reading the reviews is a quick way to learn more about a field that you might not be so familiar with and offers a complementary option to traditional journal review articles. If you would like to contribute an informal review, contact Bissette by e-mail (andrew.bissette@gmail.com) or on Twitter (@_byronmiller).

Written by Chad Jones, who blogs at https://www.thecollapsedwavefunction.com.

———-

[As mentioned in this post, we’re posting the monthly blogroll column here on the Sceptical Chymist. This is the October 2013 article]

Chlorine chronicles

I’ve had a rather busy summer, and apologize for not posting earlier about last month’s ‘in your element’ piece. Our before-latest article sees Barbara Finlayson-Pitts from the University of California, Irvine take a look at chlorine. I’m happy to say that this element, which chemists and non-chemists alike are well acquainted with, completes our first family of the periodic table!

© J. N. PITTS JR

© J. N. PITTS JR

The first report of chlorine has some fantastic and charming old chemical language in it (I think I may have already mentioned my penchant for archaic terms): Carl Wilhelm Scheele noticed that reacting “brunsten” with “muriatic acid” led to a yellowish green gas — check in the article just what those reactants were. At the time, the gas was referred to as “oxymuriatic acid”, a compound of oxygen and muriatic acid. It was Sir Humphry Davy that later identified it as a new element, and named it chlorine after its colour.

Element 17 is abundant, and has found many applications, for better (such as for bleaching and disinfecting water) or for worse (for example, chlorinated compounds have been used as chemical weapons). One aspect discussed in the article, which must not be neglected, is its atmospheric chemistry. The chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) of aerosols and refrigerants have been linked to much damage in the atmosphere. Other sources of element 17 that contribute to its atmospheric chemistry are increasingly being identified. NaCl particles from seas and oceans, and dust from alkaline dry lakes, also contains chlorine that goes on to react with gases in the atmosphere; surprisingly, chlorine chemistry is also observed in continental regions.

In any case, don’t let the fact that “these atmospheric processes are incredibly intricate and difficult to study” stop you, Barbara Finlayson-Pitts emphasizes that “elucidating their chemistry is critical to quantitative predictions of processes, and in turn reducing or overcoming undesirable effects.”