Introducing Windback Wednesdays

{credit}Naturejobs{/credit}

Here at Naturejobs we try to keep you up to date with the latest news and advice to help you with your science career or job hunt.

But we also know that some advice never grows old, although it can get lost under a mountain of other information as the blog and website get updated.

That’s why we’ve decided to do the hard work for you. Starting today, we’ll be launching Windback Wednesdays, a new way for you to access careers advice and articles you may have missed the first time around.

For the next four weeks, every Wednesday, we’ll be looking at ways to help boost your chances of getting funding. We’ll be posting articles on our social media sites, using the hashtag #windbackweds. If you don’t already follow us, you can find us on facebook, twitter, linkedin and google plus by clicking on the links below.

Twitter

Facebook

Linkedin

Google +

In four weeks time, we will summarise all the content we’ve been sharing with you here on the blog, which means it’ll be easy for you to find it in future.

We’d love you to join in the conversation, and let us know what kind of topics you’d like us to cover in future Windback Wednesdays.

The first in our series on funding is an article on strategic tips that can add to your chances of grant success: Got to get a grant.

Happy reading!

Ask the Expert: what would you do?

What would you do?{credit}iStockphoto/Thinkstock{/credit}

For over seven years now, our readers have been asking our careers expert, Deb Koen, for advice to all sorts of career dilemmas, from questionable morals in the lab to what to do when natural disasters affect your work.

We’ve decided it might be time to shake things up a bit. So, we’ll be changing the format of our ask the expert Q&A, opening it out to you, the reader. After all, everyone has their own experience and perspective to add to the mix.

Kicking off this new format is a question about how best to shine in the interview process, especially if you’re not the kind to talk yourself up.

 Q: I am struggling with the interviewing process, issues that I’m not sure how to handle, including how to promote myself without bragging and how to keep the interview focused when it gets off track. What are some interviewing guidelines that could help address these concerns?”

We will publish Deb’s advice next week, along with  a selection of the most useful reader responses. If you’d like to offer some advice, you can email the editor at naturejobseditor@nature.com, tweet us @naturejobs using the hashtag #askdeb , or leave your response in the comments section below.

If you have a question for Deb Koen, you can find out how to submit it here.

A full list of past ask the expert Q&As can be found here in our careers toolkit.

Who gets funded? You decide

Next week, University College London (UCL) will be hosting a comedy night with a difference. During the evening, the audience will listen to pitches from a bunch of the university’s researchers who will try to persuade the crowds to vote for their bright idea. The winners will receive £2000 to get their project started.

 

Every little helps{credit}iStockphoto/Thinkstock{/credit}

 

Steve Cross, Head of Public Engagement at UCL, calls it a “radical way of opening up new avenues of participation in university research.” He says it’s rare that the public gets to debate and directly influence research ideas.

That’s a good point – much research is publicly funded, but most of us get little say over what research gets the go-ahead. Along with funding cuts during harsh economic times, and the explosion of social networking, some argue that now is the time for science funding to be cast open to a wider audience, and crowdfunding sites dedicated to science projects are starting to emerge . Continue reading

Challenging the integrity of research

Stories of scientific misconduct, from plagiarism to falsification and fabrication of results are on the rise.

What leads scientists to make such poor judgements when it comes to their work? And how can you make sure you carry out your research with integrity? For instance, you might not make up your results – but what if you fail to record your data properly making your research hard to replicate? And how bad is it to plagiarise your own work, seeing as you wrote it in the first place?

{credit}iStockphoto/Thinkstock{/credit}

These are questions tackled by a new report on responsible research conduct, published today by the InterAcademy Council and the IAP – the global network of science academies. The  report examines how scientists can uphold values vital for  science in an increasingly pressurised research environment.

Although the report says it’s impossible to accurately estimate the number of cases of irresponsible research that happen each year, they are not unheard of, with the US Office of Research Integrity reporting 9 findings of research misconduct in 2010 and surveys indicating that incidence is higher than official statistics might suggest. The percentage of scientific papers that have been retracted also seems to be on the up.

According to the report, with the rise of interdisciplinary research (where each field has its own established rules and practices), the growing importance of research in policy and public decision making, and a number of high-profile cases of misconduct reported around the world, it is more important than ever to address the issue of research integrity. Continue reading

Young scientists quiz Nobel winners

In July this year, over 27 Nobel laureates and almost 600 young scientists convened at the 62nd Lindau Meeting of Nobel Laureates in the town of Lindau in Germany.

This year’s theme was physics, and the young researchers, who were selected to attend from 69 countries, had the chance to meet and exchange views and ideas with some of the top scientists in their field.

Nature Video has produced a series of short films in which these young scientists put their own questions to Nobel laureates. The films tackle questions that are important to young physicists today, and show how this generation often don’t see things in the same way as the greats who went before them.

Lindau

{credit}Thea Cunningham{/credit}

The films have been released weekly over the past month and the last two went online last night. They cover a range of topics including dark matter, trust in science, the future of energy, and cosmological proofs. Click on the headings below to watch the videos.

Betting on the cosmos

In the latest film in the series, Nobel prize-winner Robert Laughlin challenges the students in this film, and laureate David Gross, to come up with ways to test our big ideas about the Universe. The two laureates make a bet. Watch the film to find out more and to decide who wins.

 Beyond the classroom

In this film, three young researchers join laureates Harry Kroto and Dudley Herschbach to discuss how science is perceived beyond the classroom. Kroto tells them about a creationist museum in the United States, which brings up the issue of public trust in science.

Is dark matter real?

The morning after CERN announces the discovery of the Higgs particle, three young physicists sit down with Nobel prizewinners George Smoot and Martinus Veltman to digest the news. The students see it as another success for the standard model of particle physics. But Veltman, who helped to shape this model, is cynical. Moreover, Veltman contends that there is no such thing as dark matter. See how the shocked students and Smoot respond to Veltman’s scepticism.

The energy endgame

In this film, Nobel laureates Mario Molina and Robert Laughlin challenge three young physicists to think seriously about the looming energy crisis and their children’s futures.

A golden age?

Here, three young researchers take on Nobel prize-winner John Mather. He believes we are in a golden age of astronomy, but they are not convinced. There are too many unanswered questions, they say. For example, what’s causing the accelerated expansion of the Universe observed by the other laureate in this film, Brian Schmidt?

You can also find out more about some of the young researchers who took part in the meeting at Lindau in Scientific American’s profiles: 30 under 30.

And if you still haven’t had your physics fix, we also have an Outlook supplement in this week’s issue of Nature all about Physics.

 

 

 

How to make the most of transferable skills

iStockphoto/Thinkstock

Transferable skills are perhaps the job-seekers biggest asset. They can certainly help you get a job – making your CV stand out and impressing an interviewer – and can also help you to succeed in pretty much any new undertaking. The problem is, much of the time transferable skills remain elusive – we know we must have some, but we often aren’t really sure what they look like and so can’t recognise them when we need to.

On top of which, it’s easy not to think about transferrable skills until it’s time to apply for a job, which can sometimes be too late.

Instead, it’s important to think about the kinds of transferable skills you have, and how they might be useful for any future career aspirations whilst still working away in your current role, or as a student.

 Spotting transferrable skills

Some transferrable skills may be obvious – scientists are especially good at problem solving and analysis, for instance. But there are other skills, often known as ‘soft skills’, which form part of your work or home life activities that might not come to mind immediately, but could be usefully applied in a different role or context.

“The 2011 Careers in Research Online Survey results reveal that university researchers are engaged in a wide range of activities beyond pure research,” Anna Price, Researcher Development Advisor at Kings College London, told the Naturejobs Career Expo last month. These activities include presentations at conferences, teaching, organising events such as a conference or workshop, and organizational and project management skills. What you do outside of work can also count. “You might be on the Parent-Teacher Association, or running a book club. These can be really useful when applying for jobs that require skills that aren’t part of your key role,” Price said. Continue reading

Learn how to become a bio-entrepreneur

Cross-posted from Trade Secrets blog

Brady Huggett

The word entrepreneur is thrown around so much, it can begin to lose its meaning. The term sounds vaguely swashbuckling, as if every person it applies to is flippantly quitting a secure academic job to roll the dice on a sexy, but probably doomed, start-up.

That may or may not be accurate, but the best way to define an entrepreneur is to go talk to one. Or several. Along those lines, Index Ventures (with support from Nature Biotechnology), is hosting a day-long event on October 18 in London, bringing together five experienced biotech entrepreneurs to explain just what it’s like to be at the forefront of biotech company formation.

The event will include personal perspectives from those who have already made the leap, as well as a business pitch workshop.

The event is free to students and academics. Read more about the event, and how to sign up, on the Trade Secrets blog.

 

New app lets you job-hunt on the go

App for that`

Job hunting? There's an app for that. iStockphoto/Thinkstock

Earlier this week the brand new Naturejobs app became available on both the App Store and Google Play. We hope by now you’ve had a chance to download and tryit out. If not, you can find more information, and download it here.

The app should make it even easier for you to search for science jobs on the go, giving you access to the thousands of jobs already available on the Naturejobs site. It also lets you favourite or email relevant jobs to chase up later.

Please try out it out and let us know what you think. We’d also like to know what other apps you find useful in your hunt for a new job – let us know in the comments section.