‘Brain circulation’ and other trends in global science

Forget ‘brain drain’ – many countries are now focusing their efforts on making the most of ‘brain circulation’, according to a new report on global science from the Royal Society, Britain’s national academy of science.

In a shift away from attempting to stem the flow of talented scientists overseas, countries such as China and India are setting aside resources to attract native scientists back home later in their careers while maintaining their links with host countries.

Many nomadic scientists who remain overseas are also keen to maintain links with their home countries but are unsure where to start, making them an “untapped resource” for international collaboration, according to the report, Knowledge, Networks and Nations: Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century.

Where brain drain is still a major problem, such as in Africa, governments need to reward talented scientists and enable them to foster global networks while ensuring they also help build national research capacity.

Other highlights of the report include:

• International collaboration is growing, and has a significant effect on a research paper’s impact (see ‘Research sans frontières’ for more)

• In addition to the meteoric rise of China and, to a lesser extent, Brazil and India, other rapidly emerging scientific nations include Turkey, Iran and Tunisia

• R&D investment in developing countries is increasing: the share of foreign-owned business R&D in the developing world grew from 2% in 1996 to 18% in 2002

Regions and cities are displacing countries as the relevant unit when discussing R&D – in the United States, the state of California accounted for more than one-fifth of national R&D spending in 2004, while Moscow accounts for 50% of Russian research articles

• Many established research centres and funders have become global brands that are no longer necessarily confined to their geographic location – the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom has a campus in China, for example, while the UK-based Wellcome Trust helps fund institutes in Asia and Africa

What’s your reaction to the report? If you’re a scientist working overseas, do you plan to return home later in your career? Are you seeing the benefits of international collaboration? Share your thoughts below.

Sign up to our new Twitter feeds to get the latest jobs and news

As part of our efforts to make naturejobs.com more useful to jobseekers and employers, we’ve expanded our range of Twitter feeds. Our main feed, naturejobs</a>, will now feature the <strong>latest science careers news and features</strong> from across <em>Nature</em>'s publications and further afield instead of new jobs. We'll also tweet occasionally about <strong>upcoming special features for employers</strong>. To get the latest jobs, follow one of our <strong>new automatic jobs feeds</strong> - either <a href="https://twitter.com/naturejobs_feed">naturejobs_feed for all of our science vacancies (you’ll get a lot of tweets from this feed) or one of the more targeted feeds from the list below.

We’ve chosen the feeds based on what jobs you search for on our site, plus Nature‘s main content areas – if you think we’ve missed something, either leave a comment below or tweet @naturejobs and we’ll look into it. We did the best we could with the feed names – I’ve included an explanation below if they’re not immediately clear. One or two of the feeds might not have any tweets yet, but we should get new vacancies in those areas soon.

We hope you find them useful – and good luck with your job search.

Content feed

@naturejobs – latest science careers news and features from across Nature and further afield

Automatic jobs feeds

@naturejobs_feed – all science jobs

Job type

graduates_jobs</a>

<a href="https://twitter.com/phd_jobs">phd_jobs

postdoc_jobs</a>

<a href="https://twitter.com/techniciansjobs">techniciansjobs

lab_tech_jobs</a> - laboratory technician jobs

<a href="https://twitter.com/researcher_jobs">researcher_jobs

lecturer_jobs</a>

<a href="https://twitter.com/senior_sci_jobs">senior_sci_jobs – senior scientist jobs

professor_jobs</a>

<a href="https://twitter.com/editor_jobs">editor_jobs

Discipline

biology_jobs</a>

<a href="https://twitter.com/chem_jobs">chem_jobs – chemistry jobs

physics_jobs</a>

<a href="https://twitter.com/earth_env_jobs">earth_env_jobs – earth and environmental science jobs

immunology_jobs</a>

<a href="https://twitter.com/neuro_jobs">neuro_jobs – neuroscience jobs

geoscience_jobs</a>

<a href="https://twitter.com/compu_sci_jobs">compu_sci_jobs – computer science jobs

clin_res_jobs</a> - clinical research jobs

<a href="https://twitter.com/bioinfo_jobs">bioinfo_jobs – bioinformatics jobs

@microbio_jobs – microbiology jobs

PhD students: how to improve your communication skills – and why you should

Many employers think that PhD students often lack ‘soft’ skills such as being able to communicate well, according to a new report from the UK Department for Business Innovation and Skills (see ‘Survey shows science graduates neglect career planning’ for other findings). One of the report’s authors, Robin Mellors-Bourne from the Careers Research & Advisory Centre, says a lot of employers are sceptical that PhD candidates will fit in. “They’re deemed almost to be too specialised,” he says. Christine McCary, the employment concerns chair of the US National Association of Graduate-Professional Students (NAGPS) and a full-time PhD student at Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois, says the situation is similar in the United States. So what can you do to improve your soft-skill set?

Science careers consultant Sara Shinton, of UK-based Shinton Consulting, says PhD students should always be proactive about developing their soft skills because of the high number of people being awarded postgraduate qualifications. “It’s like it used to be with [an undergraduate] degree,” she says. “A PhD on its own isn’t enough. You are going to be competing against people with the same baseline.”

Stand out from the crowd

Shinton’s advice is to look for unusual activities that will make your communication skills stand out from the crowd, such as being a representative on a committee for a professional body. “That’s not something everybody can do,” she says. It’s also something that will get an employer’s attention – in a recent survey of graduate employers, researchers from Oklahoma State University found having a leadership position in an academic organisation comes second only to the personal interview in importance for showcasing your communication skills.

Shinton says you should join the society or association first, and then get involved at a local level to raise your profile. Just being a young scientist can also help. “The voice of the young researcher at the front line is one that most professional bodies are very keen to hear from,” she says.

McCary says another way to stand out is to take a leadership role in your local community, for example by starting a science club for younger students. If you succeed, she says, “that would be direct evidence of your ability to communicate with people”.

Show initiative

Another major plus is showing initiative by making something happen that wouldn’t have otherwise, such as arranging your own scientific roadshow or conference, or setting up an informal journal within your university.

Remember to cover the basics

That’s not to say you can forget about the more traditional ways of developing communication skills, such as getting involved in outreach – Shinton says companies now expect to see this as standard on a candidate’s CV or résumé. “It’s worth doing on every sort of imaginable level,” she says, “but it isn’t something that an employer would highlight.”

And the basics include getting to grips with social media websites such as LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook. “These days every single scientist should have [a LinkedIn profile], even while they’re a student,” says McCary.

Get outside the box

Both Mellors-Bourne and McCary advocate developing your skills outside of academia. “Spending some time with different people or in a different environment is very valuable,” says Mellors-Bourne. “Even academic employers are looking for well-rounded people to work for them,” adds McCary. Shinton, however, cautions against this approach if you intend to stay in research: “It very much depends what your career trajectory is. If you intend to be a scientist, showing that you are having an impact in lots of different ways as a scientist possibly has more value.”

All three agree that studying overseas can be a boon for your communication skills. “The whole experience of overseas study strengthens you as an individual,” says Shinton. “It challenges you and it helps you to grow.” Mellors-Bourne spent four months in the United States as part of his PhD, which he found to be a life-changing experience: “I restarted my research afterwards with a completely different view of the world.”

Have your say

Do you have any other tips to add? Have you found a particular approach or method to be more effective than others? Share your thoughts by leaving a comment.

Survey finds science graduates neglect career planning

More than a quarter of final-year physics and maths undergraduates and a third of final-year geography undergraduates in the United Kingdom had no idea what kind of career they wanted when they entered university, according to new research from the Department for Business Innovation and Skills.

The survey of more than 7,000 science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) students at undergraduate and postgraduate level also showed that less than a third of final-year PhD students have a definite career in mind.

Other key findings include:

• Fewer than half of final-year physics undergraduates definitely want to pursue a career related to their degree — the second lowest figure across all STEM subjects in the survey

• Almost half of final-year PhD students across all subjects are not sure they want to pursue a career related to their research

One of the report’s authors, Robin Mellors-Bourne from the Careers Research & Advisory Centre, says that the research highlighted weaknesses in the careers advice and information on offer to students before they go to university. “Very few students choose their subject with a career in mind,” he says.

Mellors-Bourne says schools and colleges focus on promoting university as a good thing in and of itself, and don’t give enough information about potential careers. This leaves students with a lack of broad labour-market knowledge. “I think that’s particularly true of physics,” he told Naturejobs.

He says that while students shouldn’t feel compelled to make highly rational career decisions before university, more forward planning is needed: “It’s quite useful for parents or students to have some inkling of the sorts of careers that naturally would be opened up [by doing a degree].”

Institute of Physics careers manager Vishanti Fox says that the skills learnt during a physics degree are highly valued by a wide range of employers, but she agrees that students considering the subject need more information about potential careers. “Careers advice to school students and undergraduates is an area that can always be improved,” she says. “We are working with schools, universities, businesses and Government to make sure students know the options open to them with qualifications in physics.”

Mellors-Bourne says forensic science is a prime example of the dangers of ignoring career prospects when choosing a course. He estimates that because of interest from students there are now around 100 forensic science degree courses available in the UK, but only around 50 jobs become available each year, leading to a “horrendous oversupply” of forensic science graduates. “I don’t think any of them entered [their degree] realising that they probably wouldn’t get a job at the end,” he says.

What’s your reaction to the report? If you’re a student, do you feel as though you have access to enough careers advice? If you’re working as a scientist, what’s your experience of career planning?

What do the new industry-led tuition deals mean for academia and postgraduate study?

The impending hike in university tuition fees in the UK is prompting companies to offer to shoulder the financial burden in order to attract top graduate talent. Pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) followed the lead of accounting firm KPMG on Wednesday by announcing that it will reimburse tuition fees to all its UK recruits from September 2012. It’s an enticing deal – worth up to £27,000 for those taking a three-year degree – but what are the wider implications?

The scheme is only available to undergraduates and graduates in the United Kingdom who are not yet employed. They will be reimbursed once they start working for GSK, and they must remain with the company for a minimum of two years.

These new deals – which academic employers are unlikely to match – add to the uncertainty of how increased tuition fees will affect postgraduate study, an issue acknowledged by the UK minister for universities and science David Willetts in a speech to university leaders last week. In response to concerns that higher undergraduate fees could mean less postgraduate students, he announced that Adrian Smith, director-general for science and research at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, would reconvene an expert panel that examined the state of postgraduate study last year to review the potential impact.

Ellen Pearce, director of research staff support organisation Vitae, said she welcomed the review. “The potential implications of changes in the undergraduate tuition fees aren’t fully understood,” she told Naturejobs. She said the routes into doctoral research were likely to become more diverse and complex in light of the increased fees. And there may be more mobility between higher education and business if financial reward – such as the deal offered by GSK – becomes a higher priority for students. “There may also need to be new models of postgraduate education that provide more flexibility,” she added.

Universities that plan to charge the maximum allowable fees of £9,000 per year include University of Cambridge, Imperial College London and the University of Exeter.

What’s your reaction to GSK’s plans? Do you think less people will go on to postgraduate study once the higher undergraduate fees are charged? What can academic employers do to compete with the reimbursement deals that will be offered by industry?