Out of the lab and onto the streets

Nicole Forrester recounts and reflects on her experience at the March for Science in Washington D.C.

April 22 began with a drizzly ride on rented bikes through the streets of southeast D.C. to the Washington monument. I was accompanied by Dylan Jones, an outdoor recreation and environmental writer from West Virginia. “I typically opt for escaping civilization on Earth Day,” Jones said, “but today I decided to go straight into the heart of it.” We weaved through roads littered with people in rain shells and lab coats, carrying vibrant signs and rainbow umbrellas.

Capitol-smaller-cropped

Continue reading

Where do all the alumni go?

Contributors Yuriy Baglaenko and Eric Gracey

Students from the department of immunology at the University of Toronto recently completed a survey of their 288 alumni, tracking their career choices and progressions through life. In this post, Yuriy Baglaenko and Eric Gracey follow the alumni around the globe, to see where they have ended up after leaving the University of Toronto.

The sub-prime mortgage crisis of 2008 had global economic ramifications, still felt to this day. This crisis was particularly close to the heart of business schools, which were criticized for not instilling the proper skills and ethics in their graduates. In response to this disaster, many MBA programs restructured to adapt their training by having continuous dialogues with industry and adding a stronger focus on softer skills.

Recent reports have provided evidence that the scientific system may also be facing an impending crash, with funding levels stagnant, grant success rates diving and an increasing reliance on trainees as producers of knowledge. Will graduate training preemptively change to avoid a scientific meltdown or continue to lag behind a changing world?

Why survey alumni?

Unfortunately, graduate training is rarely evaluated. New courses and technologies might come and go but fundamentally, graduate education has remained unchanged for many years. Only recently have a limited number of academic or industry track PhD programs been introduced to bring training in line with a changing job market. Continue reading

‘Brain circulation’ and other trends in global science

Forget ‘brain drain’ – many countries are now focusing their efforts on making the most of ‘brain circulation’, according to a new report on global science from the Royal Society, Britain’s national academy of science.

In a shift away from attempting to stem the flow of talented scientists overseas, countries such as China and India are setting aside resources to attract native scientists back home later in their careers while maintaining their links with host countries.

Many nomadic scientists who remain overseas are also keen to maintain links with their home countries but are unsure where to start, making them an “untapped resource” for international collaboration, according to the report, Knowledge, Networks and Nations: Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century.

Where brain drain is still a major problem, such as in Africa, governments need to reward talented scientists and enable them to foster global networks while ensuring they also help build national research capacity.

Other highlights of the report include:

• International collaboration is growing, and has a significant effect on a research paper’s impact (see ‘Research sans frontières’ for more)

• In addition to the meteoric rise of China and, to a lesser extent, Brazil and India, other rapidly emerging scientific nations include Turkey, Iran and Tunisia

• R&D investment in developing countries is increasing: the share of foreign-owned business R&D in the developing world grew from 2% in 1996 to 18% in 2002

Regions and cities are displacing countries as the relevant unit when discussing R&D – in the United States, the state of California accounted for more than one-fifth of national R&D spending in 2004, while Moscow accounts for 50% of Russian research articles

• Many established research centres and funders have become global brands that are no longer necessarily confined to their geographic location – the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom has a campus in China, for example, while the UK-based Wellcome Trust helps fund institutes in Asia and Africa

What’s your reaction to the report? If you’re a scientist working overseas, do you plan to return home later in your career? Are you seeing the benefits of international collaboration? Share your thoughts below.