Citizen Science: A Hobby with implications

Petra

Petra D’Odorico is an environmental / earth system scientist studying land vegetation dynamics from space and in the field. She has a PhD from the University of Zurich where she continued working as a postdoc at the Remote Sensing Laboratories of the Geography Department. Currently, she is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Grassland Science Group at the Institute of Agricultural Sciences of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, working on plant phenology and ecosystem biogeochemical cycles.

How ordinary people are helping us understand climate change and much more 

When it all began, not much was known about them and the academic elite were wary. But then – in times of harsh budget cuts with institutional funding and research support drying out – mistrust is a luxury only few can afford. Unsurprising then, that in recent years academia has begun opening its gates to a workforce that has appeared at the right time, seems intelligent enough, is eager to contribute and has enough free time to help collect data on all kinds of species and phenomena: Citizen Scientists. But how did it all begin?

Back in 1999, the University of California at Berkeley invited citizens to donate idle time on their home computers to analyze radio telescope data with the hope of discovering signals from extraterrestrial civilizations (SETI@home). In 2005, a second project kicked off, this time run by the University of Washington in Seattle, allowing volunteers to download a program devoted to the difficult problem of protein folding (Rosetta@home). Soon it became clear that computing power was not the only resource hiding in those homes. Scientists realized that human brainpower was the real capital to be outsourced. By mid-2008, an interface allowed users not just to assist the computation but also to interact with it helping it to converge to a solution more quickly. The Citizen Science Era had officially begun!

Continue reading

The Science of Spin

Julia Archbold is a National Health and Medical Research Postdoctoral Fellow at the Institute for Molecular Bioscience in Brisbane, Australia. She has worked for industry, spending three years as a screening biologist with AstraZeneca in Australia. Her PhD research investigated the structures of T cell receptors and their ligands, providing insight into organ transplant rejection. Her PhD work led to the Victorian Premier’s Award for Medical Research in 2010. After postdoctoral work at the University of Auckland in Professor Ted Baker’s lab on G protein coupled receptors, Julia has returned to the University of Queensland to continue working in the area of structural immunology. This year she was awarded the UQ Early Career Researcher Grant for her work on the structures of Membrane Proteins. Julia also contributes articles to the Australian Biochemist magazine.

Science arose from poetry… when times change the two can meet again on a higher level as friends.Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

The definition of spin according to the free dictionary is “to provide an interpretation of (a statement or event, for example), especially in a way meant to sway public opinion”. Should swaying and convincing your peers that your interpretation of your results is correct be the basis for a good research article? Do we, as researchers, need to fine-tune the science of spin?

spinning topIt was my PhD supervisor at Monash University who repeatedly asked me this question, etching it into my brain: “Julia, what is the punch line of your paper?” Back then I was confused: how do I know what the main message of my paper will be is if I haven’t finished my experiments or written the paper? But looking back, I realize he was training me. To write a good research article, you must know the main message you are trying to get across. The end of your paper, as well as the ending sentence of your abstract, is absolutely critical. You need to have a short, catchy, one sentence summary of the main finding of your work, and why people should care.

At the end of my PhD, I attended a media training session. The trainers encouraged us to simplify our research to communicate our results with the public. Again, they told me to come up with ‘one short catchy sentence’ to convey my research to the public, and repeat that over and over in interviews, so that people get the take home message. For those who have ever participated in the 3 minute thesis competition, you will know how hard it is to condense years of research into a couple of minutes let alone one sentence!

Since my PhD days, both of the institutes I have worked at, namely the University of Auckland and the University of Queensland, have emphasised our obligation as scientists to communicate our research with the public. It is the public who fund the majority of our research and they deserve an explanation of why they should continue to give us the dollars. And thus, the science of spin is born. How do you put the best light on your research to attract the money from the funding bodies, from the public and get published in the best journals? Continue reading

HEAVY DEBT

Gordon-ChaplinGordon Chaplin was a journalist in the Saigon bureau of Newsweek and at Bangkok World, the Baltimore Sun, and the Washington Post. He has also worked in sea conservation with the group Niparaja and since 2003 has been a research associate at the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia. He is the author of several books, including Dark Wind: A Survivor’s Tale of Love and Loss. He lives with his wife and daughter in New York City and Hebron, New York, where they run a grass-fed beef operation. Gordon is the author of FULL FATHOM FIVE: Ocean Warming and a Father’s Legacy

Returning to one’s childhood is a fraught exercise on many levels. What if your sacred memories turn out to be false or faulty? What if you yourself have changed too much to fit back in? And scariest of all, what if the place you’re returning to no longer exists?

I grew up in the Bahamas in the fifties and sixties, helping my ichthyologist father collect and study fishes for his monumental scientific text, Fishes of the Bahamas and Adjacent Tropical Waters. In many ways the book was my sibling. I knew the reefs as well as the rooms in our home, and the fishes that lived in them were my peers. Continue reading

Voyager 1 Reaches Interstellar Space

Bohle headshotShannon Bohle has experience with NASA, is a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society in the UK,  is a lifetime member of the Cambridge University Astronomical Society, and has held  professional memberships in the AAAS, the British Society for the History of Science, The National Space Society, The Planetary Society, and The Mars Society. She is  a registered consultant for the Science and Entertainment Exchange run by the National Academy of Sciences.

Boldly Traveling Where No Archival Recording has Gone Before

On 12 September 2013, following analysis of data from its Voyager 1 spacecraft, NASA confirmed that the spacecraft has now reached a new milestone; interstellar space. It seems fitting that Carl Sagan, astronomy popularizer and pioneer in the field of exobiology, wanted to send library materials. Inside the box-like portion of the spacecraft, called the satellite bus structure, is the first archival sound recording designed to be understood by non-human intelligent life. If intelligent life is out there, let’s just hope they enjoy our first publication so much that they visit Earth to request a library card.

SCI Space Craft International, www.SpacecraftKits.com

SCI Space Craft International, www.SpacecraftKits.com. Click on the image to enlarge 

Infographic about the Voyager spacecraft showing the location of the image and sound recordings. “The SCI ‘Fact Sheet’ graphic products, for Voyager and other interplanetary spacecraft, have been seen in the hands of flight team members as well as enthusiasts among the public. The box structure is called the spacecraft bus. The circular, gold-plated information package is mounted to the outboard face of one of [the bus’s] ten bays.”

Voyager, A Look Back

Kicking the proverbial wheels and dipping the oil stick, on 5 September 1977 NASA launched Voyager 1 from Kennedy Space Flight Center. By 1979 it was whipping past Jupiter, and by 1980 it completed a flyby of Saturn and began a course that would take it out of the solar system:

Video credit: NASA JPL

pale blue dot

“This narrow-angle color image of the Earth, dubbed ‘Pale Blue Dot’, is a part of the first ever ‘portrait’ of the solar system taken by Voyager 1. The spacecraft acquired a total of 60 frames for a mosaic of the solar system from a distance of more than 4 billion miles from Earth and about 32 degrees above the ecliptic. From Voyager’s great distance Earth is a mere point of light, less than the size of a picture element even in the narrow-angle camera. Earth was a crescent only 0.12 pixel in size. Coincidentally, Earth lies right in the center of one of the scattered light rays resulting from taking the image so close to the sun. This blown-up image of the Earth was taken through three color filters — violet, blue and green — and recombined to produce the color image. The background features in the image are artifacts resulting from the magnification.”
(Description and image credit: NASA JPL).

In 1990, the spacecraft lost the ability to return photos to Earth. Its last image, Pale Blue Dot, has become a famous look back at our planet that shows just how small our world really is in the vastness of our solar system. It was also used in the title of and inspiration for science writer Carl Sagan’s book, Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space (1994).     

How Does NASA Know Voyager 1
Reached Interstellar Space?

There are some arguments about whether or not Voyager 1 has left the solar system. The term solar system is most commonly used to refer to the inner solar system which includes the sun and planets. So, yes, Voyager 1 left the inner solar system in 1990. On its journey, it continued towards the edge of the heliosphere. “The heliosphere is the immense magnetic bubble containing our [inner] solar system, solar wind, and the entire solar magnetic field.” In 2012, the probe passed the edge of the heliosphere, called the heliopause, which separates the heliosphere from the interstellar medium. The heliopause “traps” the stellar wind (which carries dust and particles) and does not let it escape into the interstellar medium. The term interstellar literally means “the space between stars,” the place where Voyager 1 is now located. (The plural of “interstellar medium” is “interstellar media,” from which is derived the title of this piece). The problem with saying that Voyager 1 is no longer in the solar system is that, technically speaking, the solar system (comprised of both the inner and outer solar system) is an area where any body is primarily influenced by the gravitational pull of a star, like our sun. Since the 1960s, scientists have agreed that the sun’s gravitational influence extends into the Oort Cloud, a very large region, but they are not sure how far into the Oort Cloud to draw the boundary of what could be considered our solar system. Clearly, then, Voyager is located in the interstellar medium but has not left the solar system.

v timeline

Voyager: The Grand Journey and Beyond.
(Image credit: NASA JPL)

As the sun “burns” it emits particles of light and heat released during nuclear reactions called hydrogen fusion. The energies from these reactions propel charged particles (called plasma) into space, sometimes through large bursts called prominences. Large prominences are called Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) while smaller ones are solar flares. Sometimes these particles hit the Earth in large doses, during space weather events, and are often referred to as solar storms or geomagnetic storms. Depending on their strength, which is measured and monitored by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other agencies, these particles can cause a variety of problems for communications satellites and the International Space Station orbiting the Earth as well as electronic equipment on Earth.

According to researchers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), when plasma passes through space within the heliosphere it would hit a detector “uniformly from all directions,” but particles that reached Voyager 1 as a result of the “St. Patrick’s Day Solar Storms” a year earlier showed different results. “Sunspot AR1429 unleashed a powerful X5-class solar flare detected by solar observing satellites and Earth on 7 March 2012, commencing the ‘St. Patrick’s Day storms’ of 2012.” Unusual readings continued to be detected from May through July 2012. According to NASA JPL, it took about 400 days (beginning 11 April 2013) for each solar outburst to have reached Voyager. See this video: Voyager 1 at the Final Frontier.

After the readings were taken it only took about 16 hours for Voyager’s radio waves to travel back to Earth. By 25 August 2012, scientists believed that Voyager had made it into interstellar space. Instead of normal readings, they said, “particles [were] hitting Voyager from some directions more than others” and sound recorded “oscillations increased in pitch,” like a shriek, indicating that the spacecraft had moved into a very different plasma environment, one that was nearly twice as dense as inside the heliosphere. Since this method for determining location had never been done before, they said, it took researchers at NASA over a year to be certain and to verify the data. See this video: Voyager Reaches Interstellar Space.

The heliopause boundary is created because in addition to plasma moving through space from the sun, so too is the solar magnetic field. The interstellar magnetic field, which is composed of ions like those found in hydronium, repels the adjacent solar magnetic field, creating a “bubble” of space called the heliopause which has previously been defined as the outer edge of the solar system. The magnetic field, while strong enough to create a barrier for radiation, is not strong enough to pose a problem for a metallic spacecraft passing through this boundary just as spacecraft are able to leave the Earth’s atmosphere.

Set a Course for the Oort Cloud–Engage!

oort

NASA JPL

Voyager still has a long way to go before leaving the solar system even though it is travelling at a rate of 37,000 miles per hour (60,000 km per hour). The spacecraft is presently 11.7 billion miles (18.8 billion kilometers) from Earth. Still, it will take an estimated “300 years for Voyager 1 to reach the inner edge of the Oort Cloud and possibly about 30,000 years to fly beyond it.” In 40,000 years it is expected to reach the constellation Camelopardalis. That’s long after you and I will live. To put it into perspective, should any intelligent life actually receive the message it is unlikely humanity (if it has managed to survive) will resemble anything like what is depicted in the recordings. If anything, it may serve as a record of our history, much like cave drawing of primitive humanoids 40,000 years ago during the Upper Paleolithic era (the “Later Stone Age”) does for us today. Interestingly, we are sending the message roughly at the midpoint of our communication technologies: analog stone tools, digital tools, and who knows what else 40,000 years from now.

Radio and television signals have long since left our solar system, so chances are that any non-human intelligent life in the universe would encounter those first, and view the Voyager 1 disk as an artifact. Nevertheless, unless faster than light transportation is turned from science fiction into science fact, Voyager 1’s “gold record” may be the first “Galactic hit” in terms of physical information objects from Earth held by an otherworldly civilization.

 

This blog post will be continued over on Shannon’s SciLogs blog

Mental Illness Awareness Week: A leadership crisis in psychiatry

Julio LicinioJulio Licinio, MD, FRANZCP, is Deputy Director for Translational Medicine and Head, Mind and Brain Theme at the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and Strategic Professor of Psychiatry, Flinders University School of Medicine in Adelaide, South Australia. He is the current and founding Editor of three Nature Publishing Group journals; Molecular Psychiatry, The Pharmacogenomics Journal and Translational Psychiatry. 

Ten years ago I wrote an editorial in Molecular Psychiatry (2004;9:1) entitled “A leadership crisis in American psychiatry.” I commented on the fact that while psychiatric disorders represent some of the most fascinating as well as medically and socially relevant afflictions of mankind, there really was not strong leadership that brought those disorders to the forefront of medicine and medical science where they belong. The case is sadly the same today as a worldwide predicament, not just an American problem.

Mental illness contributes more to the global burden of disease than all cancers combined, and there is a huge discrepancy between the burden of disease and research expenditures in mental health. The US, UK, Canada and Australia spend well under 10% of their medical research budget on mental illness, while these disorders represent close to 20% of each country’s total burden of disease. We have state-of-the-art tools in genetics, imaging and other research modalities to finally tackle these challenges, yet government research expenditure is meager, several drug companies have closed down their in-house mental health research programs and leading academic health science centers have de facto divested from psychiatry, in the context of weak and insufficient leadership in the field. How have we come to this? Continue reading

Want to be A Professional Scientist? Ask to Join the Facebook Group

Marc Kuchner is the author of Marketing for Scientists, an astrophysicist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center and a country songwriter. He is the co-inventor of the band-limited coronagraph, a tool for finding planets around other stars that will be part of the James Webb Space Telescope. He is also known for his work on planets with exotic chemistries: ocean planets, helium planets, and carbon planets. Kuchner received his bachelor’s degree in physics from Harvard and his Ph.D. in astronomy from Caltech. He was awarded the 2009 SPIE early career achievement award for his work on planet hunting. He has contributed to more than 100 research papers and published articles in journals including the Astrophysical Journal, Nature, and Astrobiology. He appears as an expert commentator in the Emmy nominated National Geographic television show “Alien Earths” and frequently writes articles in Astronomy Magazine. For more career tips for scientists, go to www.marketingforscientists.com. You can also follow Marc on Twitter @marckuchner.

Planetary scientist Heidi Hammel was at the telescope when Facebook alerted her to an important new target: a comet had just crashed into Jupiter.

“I learned about one of the impacts on Jupiter via Facebook while observing on Keck, and we were able to do immediate follow-up.” Continue reading

Tear Down These Walls

DSC_0190

Buddhini Samarasinghe is a molecular biologist with experience in cancer research. She completed her PhD at the University of Glasgow, UK and then recently completed a postdoctoral position at the University of Hawaii. Her science writing can be found at Jargonwall. She is also a passionate science communicator, engaging the public with current research in the life sciences. Where possible, she uses original research papers and describes the science minus the jargon! She is also involved in science outreach through broadcasts on YouTube and other social media sites.

On a cold weeknight in late November, 1660, a dozen men gathered in the rooms at Gresham College in London to found the Royal Society. Not all of them had a scientific background; some of them were lawyers, politicians, merchants and philosophers. The one thing they all had in common was a thirst for knowledge. The formation of the Royal Society was the coming together of a group of curious gentlemen determined to promote the accumulation and dissemination of useful knowledge. It represented a paradigm shift in the practice of science. The Royal Society invented scientific publishing and peer review, two major developments that redefined science from an amateur hobby to the rigorous beast that it is today.

Continue reading

How To Learn By Blogging About Science

Scott Wager photo (2)

Scott Wagers is a physician and a researcher who is dedicated to making collaborative research projects run well. He is the founder and CEO of BioSci Consulting and blogs about collaborative research at Assembled Chaos and eTRIKS.

A visiting German professor in my college days was asked about his impressions of American students. His response was that, in contrast to the quiet, note-taking German students, he enjoyed the challenge of teaching the more questioning, thinking Americans. He said he came away from each lecture knowing more about the topic than when he started.

If you value learning, you appreciate the more interactive students. Having to answer questions, even on topics you think you know about, is a great way to learn. This type of active learning means that you not only absorb new material, but you also structure your thoughts and then articulate them.

William Zinnsser, in his book Writing to Learn, highlights another form of active learning – writing – and explains how he and others have used writing as a teaching method. Creating stories around topics can help students gain insight and can make even the dullest subjects become exciting and creative. Put a subject into a story format and voila! It becomes interesting and you remember it. A story is a thinking framework. So are blog posts. By writing your thoughts into a blog post you improve your own understanding of your subject. Blogging is a form of active learning. Continue reading

When science becomes personal: a role for personal life in advocacy

StephaniPagePhotoStephani Page is a PhD candidate at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics.  She is a member of the Bourret/Silversmith Lab in the Department of Microbiology & Immunology.  

When a patient is diagnosed with a form of cancer which has the potential to significantly shorten his lifespan, his life takes on a different meaning.   He looks at himself in the mirror, small and frail, and decides to do what it takes to make it through this trial.  Not too long ago, this was my father.  I am the only scientist in my family and, as such, I know that cancer patients, even those who have treatment options, face difficult battles ahead.  Chemotherapy drugs, while potentially adding years to a prognosis, can ravage the body.  Research often focuses on finding new chemotherapy drugs, making current drugs more effective, and minimizing the side effects.

I am a PhD candidate in the Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  One of the labs in my department actually assisted in the development of a chemotherapy drug prescribed for my father’s pancreatic cancer.  For many years I had struggled to explain to my family (made up of homemakers, lawyers, career military, teachers, nurses, etc.) what I do as a scientist and why what scientists do is important.  Suddenly, my family needed no further explanation.
Continue reading

Transmission Received: How to Promote Accuracy in Your Press Interviews

Ben Thomas PhotoBen Thomas writes articles about a variety of topics for the Riley Guide, an online repository for career and education resources. As a freelancer, Ben also covers scientific research and technological breakthroughs as well as social issues involving the sciences. A regular contributor to several leading science news websites, Ben helps scientists and academics connect with the general public by explaining their latest discoveries and controversies in clear, down-to-earth terms.

In a perfect world, every scientific message would travel from the workbench to the press with perfect clarity – but journalists and scientists are only human. The needs and functions of each profession tug at every story in different ways; whereas scientific research values proof and quantitative analysis, journalism often values punchy headlines and online debates, making it tough yet crucial for scientists to convey their announcements clearly. Here, three professional science communicators share the lessons they’ve learned through years of working with the popular press.

Take time to prepare

Any time you’re about to talk with the media, practice, practice and then practice some more. Rehearsals accomplish a lot more than just calming nerves – they’ll train you to tailor your message into a compact, easily understandable format that leaves plenty of room for questions and discussion. As you’ll find out for yourself, this is surprisingly difficult on the very first run. Continue reading