Reactions: Bryden Le Bailly

IMG_0517Bryden Le Bailly worked on iron catalysis and molecular communication devices before moving to London, where he was at Nature Nanotechnology. He is now an Associate Editor for Nature.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

I think when I realised that not quite understanding what was going on is half the point! I was lucky enough to have some inspirational teachers along the way, through school and university, to nudge me in the right direction.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be — and why?

I’d love to make my own wine, hopefully an ambition I may still fulfill later in life. It seems like a great mix of chemistry and working with your hands — both things I used to enjoy about being in the lab. And of course lots of tasting.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

Well, as I’ve just started at Nature I’m looking forward to meeting a lot of people in the organic chemistry and chemical biology communities and seeing what they’re up to!

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with — and why?

After serious consideration and whittling down a shortlist, I would say Ernest Hemingway. You know you’re getting a great character, incredible stories and a solid drinker. It’s the perfect, heady combination.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab — and what was it?

My last experiment in the lab was using a photoacid to mediate a conformational relay. It ended up being photographed and was used to promote the work, thus fulfilling my lifetime ambition as a hand model.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

Choosing one album is an almost impossible choice to make because I listen to a lot of music, but if I was stuck with The Lyre of Orpheus/Abattoir Blues by Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds for the rest of my days I think I’d be okay with it. For a book I’d have to go with something from my favourite author, Haruki Murakami, probably The Wind Up Bird Chronicle. Murakami has such a unique and vivid writing style that so many of his novels would be an ideal companion to a desert island.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions — and why?

Daniele Leonori — I never got around to asking these questions while we were both at Manchester.

The Peer Review Hymn

In the middle of a busy, newsy week, that also saw a Science Writing and Career Workshop, a Conference Proceedings publication and some travel, I happened to receive a poem from Biswapriya B. Misra, who works in the genetics department of Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

“The Peer Review Hymn”, needless to say, caught my attention immediately. Biswa has been a long-time reader of Nature India and we also featured him on our Away From Home series earlier (Living with Plants).

Here’s Biswapriya Misra‘s guest blog — his views on the peer-review process (he also rustled up this cartoon to go with it!) and the tongue-in-cheek hymn:

Cartoon

 

To an early career academic, the peer-review process both reflects and sums up his/her life. For someone who has published decently and reviewed enormously, I feel that the current academic set-up over-relies on publications in terms of number and quality. On the other hand, reviewers are burdened with so much to review and publish that the process might suffer many times. Peer review as a process may not be perfect but is the only time-tested one.

On a more personal note, performing sound science, going through steep learning curves of data handling, analysis, interpretation, visualization and the very process of authoring and co-authoring manuscripts can be very painful. On the other hand, as a reviewer, reviewing papers is a really enjoyable work, given that we are always good at critiques!

Submissions are journal-specific and formatting the citations is the most boring — how we wish all journals adopted a universal citation format! Passing through a technical editor’s criteria can be challenging at times — no matter how accurately one follows the author instructions. A good cover letter that ensures an impact on the Editor is also another big challenge!

This satire tries to sum up the plight of an author and his/her anxious state of mind during the peer review process.

 

The Peer-Review Hymn

Biswa

Biswapriya B. Misra

Oh my dear, oh my peer,
Oh my dear Peer Reviewer,
Gatekeeper of my precious career,
Please forgive that tiny mistake,
For, my career is at stake.

Formatting, and reformatting text till I blurred my sight,
Cropping images over many a night,
Following your journal’s instructions so tight,
Please do not reject my manuscript outright!

The PI was running low on resources,
Dear reviewer, please accept my excuses,
I was unable to perform your suggested experiments,
And my entire group will vouch, and still laments.

The data was not ‘garbage in and garbage out’,
Stats have helped me win this tough bout,
No oranges were compared with apples,
Even though the controls look just like samples!

Took me years to convince my PI,
He did not like my experiments or even stop by,
But now, as his name and reputation are on line,
He wants all credit supposed to be mine!

Oh Ghost Author, oh Ghost Author,
Never heard of you until we uploaded the paper,
Where were you, and foremost, who are you?
Do us a favour, and please decline to be there, will you?

Oh Reviewer, oh Reviewer One and Two,
Please write at least a paragraph – a line or two?
If my effort has taken 3 years to come about,
Will you be a wee bit interested to read it out?

Praying hard to avoid Reviewer Three,
Who has a reputation to reject for free,
No matter what the first two say,
He has to put his nose in the way, anyway!

Oh Editor, oh Editor, Once you have seen the review,
Hope the readers do not have to pay-per-view,
Whatever the form — single, double or blind,
Peer-review is vital for the scientist’s soul and mind.

Please let me out of this situation,
I want to survive until graduation,
Still churning out papers to get tenured,
Oh Reviewer, oh Journal, I shall come back, be assured.

This New Year I shall have new resolutions,
Ready with exact answers and replies to suggestions,
Shall make a career out of these, and more publications,
Building on my PIs reputation and connections.

Oh journal, Oh journal,
I shall be loyal to you till my funeral,
Please accept my investigation,
For the peace of my soul and for my salvation!

Nature’s Grand Societal Challenges

Let’s talk career with Naturejobs

Every week, Indigenus brings you some interesting and relevant posts from sister blog Naturejobs, a leading online resource for scientists in academia and industry who seek guidance in developing their careers. The blog delivers a mix of expert advice and personal stories to help readers review, set and achieve their career goals.

This week we have Nature editor in chief Sir Philip Campbell, speaking about Nature‘s Grand Societal Challenges at the Naturejobs Career Expo, London, 2016.

 

Suggested posts

What personal qualities do you need to stand out in academia?

Have you ever had to compromise your personal life?

Science communication: Do you struggle with staying impartial?

The story behind the story: Box 27

In this week’s Futures story, Kevin Lauderdale presents Box 27. When not wrestling with the thorny issue of species definitions, Kevin has found himself writing essays and articles for the Los Angeles Times, The Dictionary of American Biography and McSweeneys.net. You can find out more about his work at his website. Here Kevin reveals what inspired his latest tale — as ever, it pays to read the story first.

Writing Box 27

The 1980 TV series Cosmos, hosted by Carl Sagan, affected me greatly. I was in grade school when it aired. Although I’d always been vaguely interested in science, this brought home to me the magnificence of the Universe and the wide breadth of what people who worked in the sciences studied.

In the penultimate episode, ‘Encyclopedia Galactica’, Sagan pages through an imaginary compendium of information about billions of worlds. We see entries for three representative planets. Among other information, we read about each planet’s age, its sun’s composition, its technology level and its ‘Society Code’ — its nickname, if you will. Sagan shows us the entry for ‘We Who Survived’, a planet only a little more advanced than Earth. Then there is ‘We Who Became One’, a super-civilization that has harnessed the power of supergiants and pulsars. And finally, Earth: a planet with no extra-planetary colonies, that’s still using fossil fuels and nuclear weapons, and that has only a 40% probability of surviving the next 100 years. Our Society Code is simply ‘Humanity’.

That idea has intrigued me for 36 years now. In the Universe Sagan imagined, how did we chose that name to be known by? Who chose it? Or was it imposed on us by the Encyclopedia’s writers? A few months ago, I began thinking more and more about this. What were some of the other options for labelling us Terrans? What might work and what would not?

Originally, my story had a different ending. Even though I was inspired by Sagan, I didn’t have my hero settle on ‘Humanity’ in the end. But as I fine-tuned my story, I became less and less satisfied with that ending. I sat down and watched much of Cosmos again. I quickly saw how right Sagan had been in making his choice. Thinking back over the whole of the series, I rediscovered the idea that we need to work together in order to solve our problems. Luckily, it is our natural inclination to do so. We are humans, but Humanity means we were not alone. I rewrote the last third of the story to fit the now-correct ending. (An ending that had been correct since 1980. Protip: you can’t improve on Carl Sagan.)

If this story speaks to you in any way, you owe it to yourself to go watch Cosmos. Maybe for the second time, maybe for the first. Celebrate Sagan’s vision, brilliance and, yes, humanity.

 

Werner Herzog gets geological

Posted on behalf of Noah Baker

InfernoThe film Into the Inferno opens with a grand spectacle. The camera glides up and over tiny figures clustered on the peak of the volcanic island of Ambrym in Vanuatu in the South Pacific. Far below, an ominous lava lake splutters to a bombastic choral soundtrack. There is a sense of ritualistic grandeur here that sets the tone for what follows.

The documentary, created by legendary filmmaker Werner Herzog and Cambridge volcanologist Clive Oppenheimer, straddles the science and culture of volcanoes. It is strong on exploring the significance of volcanoes to humanity — their role in local mythologies, traditions and lifestyles, now and through the centuries. The film even suggests that our relationship with these geological giants stretches back to early hominids living in the shadows of volcanoes in East African rift valleys.

Like many Herzog films, Inferno goes off on tangents and strays into quirky side stories, hopping about among unusual locations. One moment we’re hearing from a volcanology station in North Korea, where Oppenheimer, in a rare international collaboration, has been working with local volcanologists for several years. The next we’re in the midst of an archaeological dig in Ethiopia, scientists scraping away at the soil in search of early hominid remains. The stories and locations do link back to volcanoes, but sometimes a little obliquely.

Oppenheimer occasionally brings insights into the science among the craters and cones, but his central quest remains cultural. And that yields a trove — not least the ‘cargo cult’ on the island of Tanna in Vanuatu. Its members worship a US serviceman called John Frum, who they claim lives in local volcano Yasur.

Noah Baker is senior editor in Nature’s multimedia team. Hear his Nature Podcast interview with Oppenheimer here.

 

For Nature’s full coverage of science in culture, visit www.nature.com/news/booksandarts.