The people you thought mattered in 2011

At the end of 2011 we published the Nature 10: ten people who mattered in science that year. We explained how we reached our choice, through discussion (and arguments). We also asked readers to tell us in a poll who they thought had a significant impact in science that year. Readers could vote for the people in the Nature 10 as well as ten others, some of whom had been nominated on Twitter. Seeing as we’re now well into 2012, it’s past time we reported the results.

The clear winner, with nearly 55% of the 1,631 votes, was Tasuhiko Kodama, who challenged the Japanese government’s handling of the Fukushima disaster. It’s a worthy choice, particularly with the anniversary of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster next week as a reminder of the damage that was wrought. However, we can only suspect that some kind of mini-voting campaign by Kodama fans pushed votes for him so much higher than any other name on the list.

The next favourite was Dario Autiero, whose team claimed to have found faster-than-light neutrinos (10.6%), followed by John Rogers, the engineer with a knack for turning physics into technology (5.2%). Rosie Redfield, Mike Lamont and David Attenborough more or less tied for fourth place. Aside from Sir David, all of these were also on the original Nature 10 list.

Autiero was back in the news this year when his team pointed to possible errors in the its measurements that cast the neutrino claims into doubt. Lamont and the Large Hadron Collider are guaranteed more news time if, as expected, scientists there either confirm or rule out the discovery of the Higgs boson later this year. So perhaps they’ll be candidates for the Nature 10 this year, too. Thanks for voting in our poll, and we’d be happy to hear nominations for the people who matter in 2012 anytime via Twitter (@NatureNews) or Facebook.

Resurrecting extinct proteins shows how a machine evolves

By bringing long-dead proteins back to life, researchers have worked out the process by which evolution added a component to a cellular machine. The result, they say, is a challenge to proponents of intelligent design who maintain that complex biological systems can only have been created by a divine force.

Cells rely on ‘machines’ made of multiple different protein components to carry out many vital functions in the cell, and molecular and evolutionary biologists have puzzled about how they evolved. In an effort to find out, Joe Thornton at the University of Oregon in Eugene chose to study a particular machine called the V-ATPase proton pump, which channels protons across membranes and is vital for keeping cell compartments at the right acidity. Part of this machine is a ring of six proteins that threads through the membrane.

In animals and most other eukaryotes, this ring is composed of two types of protein; fungi are alone in having a ring with three. Thornton wanted to know how the machine evolved from the simple to the more complex form. And, because he has built a lab that specializes in resurrecting ancient proteins, he had just the tools to find out at hand. Continue reading

UK announces major study of human development

Some 90,000 babies born in the UK will grow up to become some of the most scientifically scrutinised in the world. The UK government announced today that researchers will track the group in a new multi-million pound ‘birth cohort’ study with the aim of understanding how social, economic and biological factors during pregnancy and infancy eventually influence people’s health, development, occupation, education and well being.

maternity survey.JPG

The cohort will be the latest in a series of British cohort studies that have tracked children from birth. It comes in the week that members of the oldest of these cohorts, all born in one week in March 1946, celebrate their 65th birthday. The 1946 study has become the oldest continuous running birth cohort in the world and a feature in Nature this week tells how this group of ordinary British men and women have become some of the most scientifically valuable people in the planet. Later British cohort studies were started in 1958, 1970 and at the turn of the millennium, efforts that are a point of envy amongst epidemiologists because such studies are expensive and difficult to start and sustain.

Unlike previous cohorts, the newest one will reflect today’s intense research interest in the long term impacts of genetic and environmental influences during pregnancy and early infancy. A range of social and biomedical information will be gathered on parents during pregnancy; and from the parents and baby twice during the first year. Plans for the new cohort were stuck in funding limbo for several months after the UK general election last year. The announcement today by David Willetts, universities and science minister, confirmed that it will be funded as part of £33.5 million awarded from the Government Department of Business Innovation and Skills, the Economic and Social Research Council and the Medical Research Council — a sizable chunk of funding in the country’s current cost cutting climate. A large part of the funding will go to a new research facility which will co-ordinate studies from all the British birth cohorts.

Continue reading

World Science Festival: Scientists explore grey matters at The Moth

Cross posted from Nature Medicine’s Spoonful of Medicine blog.

What do a Nobel prize-winning physicist, a stem cell scientist and a video game pioneer have in common? They were all onstage at New York University’s Webster Hall on Thursday night to talk about how science impacted their lives — in ways both humorous and poignant — at The Moth, New York’s quirky storytelling venue.

Read the rest of the post on the Spoonful blog.

World Science Festival: Scientists explore grey matters at The Moth

Cross posted from Nature Medicine’s Spoonful of Medicine blog.

What do a Nobel prize-winning physicist, a stem cell scientist and a video game pioneer have in common? They were all onstage at New York University’s Webster Hall on Thursday night to talk about how science impacted their lives — in ways both humorous and poignant — at The Moth, New York’s quirky storytelling venue.

Read the rest of the post on the Spoonful blog.

World Science Festival: Gala of Science

There was something for everyone’s taste in the “cool cup of science” — as actor Alan Alda introduced it — that made up the opening gala for this year’s World Science Festival in New York. The evening included an impressive roster of artists, from Yo-Yo Ma to John Lithgow to Kelli O’Hara; and an equally impressive line-up of scientists, including Stephen Hawking, the physicist to whom the evening’s performances paid tribute.WSF logo.bmp

The Festival is now in its third year and seems to be gaining momentum and profile in the city — you can see the listing of events here, (some of which are being streamed on the web) and blog coverage here . Nature will also be blogging from a few select events.

Continue reading

World Science Festival: Gala of Science

There was something for everyone’s taste in the “cool cup of science” — as actor Alan Alda introduced it — that made up the opening gala for this year’s World Science Festival in New York. The evening included an impressive roster of artists, from Yo-Yo Ma to John Lithgow to Kelli O’Hara; and an equally impressive line-up of scientists, including Stephen Hawking, the physicist to whom the evening’s performances paid tribute.WSF logo.bmp

The Festival is now in its third year and seems to be gaining momentum and profile in the city — you can see the listing of events here, (some of which are being streamed on the web) and blog coverage here . Nature will also be blogging from a few select events.

Continue reading

AAAS 2010: Blogs, twitter, videos … oh my!

Posted on behalf of Neda Afsarmanesh.

It would have been more appropriate to have my laptop open and to blog or twitter while at the talk on Communicating Science in the New Information Age. But alas, even if I had remembered my laptop at 8:30 in the morning, it would have been useless at the San Diego Convention Center; oddly enough, most of the rooms lack WiFi. So I stuck it out with the ways of the “old information age”: pen and paper.

The take home message from my quickly jotted notes: traditional media formats may be falling out of fashion, but it isn’t the end of science journalism. It means that journalists, communication officers, and yes, even scientists, need to be creative in using the new media resources available.

Continue reading

AAAS 2010: Blogs, twitter, videos … oh my!

Posted on behalf of Neda Afsarmanesh.

It would have been more appropriate to have my laptop open and to blog or twitter while at the talk on Communicating Science in the New Information Age. But alas, even if I had remembered my laptop at 8:30 in the morning, it would have been useless at the San Diego Convention Center; oddly enough, most of the rooms lack WiFi. So I stuck it out with the ways of the “old information age”: pen and paper.

The take home message from my quickly jotted notes: traditional media formats may be falling out of fashion, but it isn’t the end of science journalism. It means that journalists, communication officers, and yes, even scientists, need to be creative in using the new media resources available.

Continue reading

AAAS 2010: 13 months of science and Obama

You have to hand it to Eric Lander: he gives a good talk. At last night’s plenary session, he admitted he would have been more comfortable talking about the human genome. But as one of three co-chairs of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) he was instead tasked with reflecting on science and technology in the Obama administration just over one year in, and he kept the full house rapt.

Here’s a one-minute version (of Lander’s version) of the last 13 months:

Jan: Inauguration speech: “We’ll restore science to its rightful place.”

Feb: >$100 billion for science and technology in the economic stimulus package.

March: Obama overturns Bush-era restrictions on human embryonic stem cells

April: Obama sets goal of spending 3% of GDP on R&D.

June: “We will open centers of scientific excellence in Africa, the Middle East and Southeast Asia, and appoint new Science Envoys.”

July-Sept: Summer; PCAST meets; plus lots of H1N1 influenza.

Oct: Presidential commission rethinks space program

Nov: Launches program to boost science education. National Lab Day launched, but turns out to be every day.

Dec-Jan: Winter

Feb: Freeze on discretionary spending; yet Obama budget requests nearly 6% increase for R&D.

Lander emphasized that he was talking about his own experiences, not speaking on behalf of the White House. The White House would have been pretty happy with his talk though; at some points you had to wonder if Obama had been doing anything but furthering science in its first year.