Senate Hearing on H5N1 papers exposes political divisions

26 April in Washington DC, US Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut revealed that his grandmother was killed by influenza during the 1918 pandemic. This was one reason he has been so interested in a pair of yet-to-be-published papers on laboratory-created H5N1 avian influenza strains that could conceivably prove many times more deadly than the 1918 flu. The other reason for his interest is that he chairs the committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, which had called a hearing to understand how decisions were made about the research’s potential use as an agent of bioterrorism. At the hearing, officials involved in making the decision to publish the research were queried about a letter that was leaked to the press two weeks ago. In the letter, Michael Osterholm, a member of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), accused the U.S. government of stacking the decks in favour of full publication during a crucial closed door meeting in March at which the NSABB was asked to re-evaluate the papers.

Paul Keim, acting chair of the NSABB, who testified today, said “I view it as a very constructive type of communication. It was unfortunate that it was leaked to the public… that made it very hard to have a constructive conversation about it.” He went on to say that he agreed with Osterholm’s contention that there was a bias in the list of witnesses presenting evidence for and against full publication. The presenters included the two researchers whose teams had performed the research and one of their collaborators. “But the bias inherent in these witnesses was not very important,” Keim says, noting that the board members were able to ask them tough, probing questions. Continue reading

A bend in the river for cancer genomics

People can be forgiven for thinking that the messages coming out of the American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting in Chicago this week seem to conflict. Finishing up today, the meeting hosted nearly 17,000 scientists, exhibitors and guests and had several talks expounding the dizzying pace of genome technologies being applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. At the same time, some speakers warned of the challenges inherent in doing cancer ‘omics.’

A plenary talk Sunday evening by Elaine Mardis of the Genome Institute at Washington University in St Louis covered her group’s ongoing work to characterize individual patients’ tumours using what she calls deep digital sequencing, which looks at the whole-genome sequence from a patient and his or her cancer and then resequences and verifies individual mutations in DNA and RNA recovered from multiple biopsies. Her methods can show not only differences between cancer cells and normal cells but also how cancer cells change and evolve over time and in response to treatment. She has published recently on this for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and for myelodysplastic syndromes that can progress to AML.

Continue reading

The new gatekeepers: reducing research misconduct

Mistakes, goofs and outright deceptions litter the scientific literature, but there is something that can be done about it. Scientists, writers and journal editors gathered at Rockefeller University in New York last evening to discuss increases in retracted research over the past several years and how best to correct the research record.

“Image manipulation is not a new phenomenon, but it is an increasingly visible one,” said Liz Williams, executive editor of the Journal of Cell Biology (JCB), a Rockefeller University Press journal that has led the way in ferreting out manipulated images before their publication. She was one of three panelists that I helped to bring together for the latest Science Online New York City (SONYC) event, hosted by nature.com and Rockefeller University.

Continue reading

Video: Debating H5N1 and dual-use research

On 2 February, scientists and public health officials squared off in a panel discussion at the New York Academy of Sciences. Debate raged around the fate of two papers that describe a mutant strain of the avian influenza virus H5N1. The virus is capable of mammal-to-mammal transmission, which has raised concern that it might be transferable to humans. Several panelists sat down with Nature News to discuss their positions.

See also our web special on the H5N1 controversy.

*Update 08/02/12: New York Academy of Sciences has posted full video of the 2 hour debate.

Emotion runs high at H5N1 debate

Last night, researchers and public health officials gathered high above New York City’s ‘Ground Zero’ in hopes of narrowing the divide within the scientific community over the fate of two papers currently in the press at Nature and Science demonstrating mammalian transmission of avian influenza H5N1. Dozens of commentaries and news stories have born out the debate as to whether or not the research should be published in full, allowing others to replicate it. Michael Osterholm, who was part of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) which unanimously recommended redaction of the papers, referred to them as, “the two most famous unpublished manuscripts in the history of life science.”

At the panel, hosted by The New York Academy of Science, moderator W. Ian Lipkin of Columbia University said that “the emotional debate is something we’re going to try to keep to a low roar tonight.” Emotions nevertheless ran high as panelists accused each other of misrepresenting facts and rushing too quickly to either publish or censor scientific data. Continue reading

How bedbugs came back, with a vengeance

bedbug9817_300.jpgBedbugs suck — blood mostly, but they are also a costly problem, says Rajeev Vaidyanathan of SRI International in Menlo Park, California, who led a series of talks on the creepy parasites at the American Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in Philadelphia today.

New York City has reported a cost of US$10 million-40 million to control them, says Vaidyanathan, and in 2010 some 95% of pest-control agencies reported bedbugs as a number-one concern. They’ve been a huge worry for the hotel and hospitality industry in the United States, and after a few speakers presented their data (with stomach-wrenching pictures), several members of the audience were asking for ways to keep the parasites from hitchhiking home on their luggage.

A driving question for the past few years has been why, in just the past decade or so, have bedbugs come to thrive in the United States? Colby Schal of North Carolina State University in Raleigh has been looking to answer this question through bedbug genetics, as we reported earlier this year.

Continue reading

A new map of “the other” malaria

The malarial parasite, Plasmodium vivax, is something of a forgotten step sister to the more prevalent, more deadly Plasmodium falciparum. Global and local programmes looking to eradicate malaria may need to pay it more attention say several health experts presenting at this year’s annual meeting for the American Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in Philadelphia taking place this week.

Today, in poster sessions, Peter Gething from Oxford University presented a newly updated map created by the Malaria Atlas Project and showing P. vivax’s impact around the world. “If you asked people before this map was available about vivax’s prevalence, you get 100 different answers,” says Gething.

So, the team assembled data from roughly 8,000 site-based surveys of infection rates and from this drew up maps modelling prevalence and risk. Because many of the survey results could only be found in unpublished ‘grey literature’ they had to work closely with global and local health ministries to get access to the numbers.

The risk of contracting this disease is extremely low throughout most of Africa, where P. falciparum is rampant and a form of genetic resistance to vivax known as Duffy negativity is widespread. But P. vivax is extremely widespread, putting nearly 130 million people at risk in Indonesia alone – more than half the population according to a map of that country presented by Iqbal Elyazar of the Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit in Jakarta, Indonesia.

“The headline for us,” says Gething, “is in terms of the elimination agenda.” The idea has been that P. vivax is a benign, less common form of malaria than its more dangerous sibling P. falciparum, which attracts upwards of 97% of the funding in terms of research and control* a far greater share of research-and-development investment. But differences in P. vivax’s life cycle and the mosquito based vectors that transmit it could make forgetting about it a serious problem.

Image: Malaria Atlas Project

* Update 12/03/2012: The 97% figure previously listed was inaccurate. According to a PATH report from last year, P. vivax was the specified target for roughly 3% of R&D funding between 2007 and 2009. Roughly 45% went to P. falciparum and more than 50% did not report the species of malaria. I regret the error and thank Austin Walker of Northwestern University for questioning my source and pointing out the error.

Researcher confesses to stealing lab notebooks

Mikovits.jpgThe story keeps getting stranger. In two sworn affidavits dated 16 and 21 November, researcher Max Pfost admitted to stealing laboratory notebooks from his employer, the Whittemore Peterson Institute (WPI) in Reno, Nevada, and giving them to Judy Mikovits, the institute’s former research director.

He states that he retrieved “between 12-20 notebooks” from a locked desk in Mikovits’s former office on the morning of 30 September. This was one day after Mikovits was fired from her post for insubordination. He stored them in his mother’s garage in a “multicoloured Happy Birthday” bag, and reports that he gave them to Mikovits in Reno on 16 October, when she came to retrieve some personal items. Mikovits has maintained that she had not returned to Nevada since being fired.

Mikovits was arrested in Ventura, California, on felony charges this past Friday, as a fugitive from the law. She awaits a hearing for extradition to Nevada, where she faces a civil suit filed by WPI over the alleged stolen notebooks and data.

Continue reading

Researcher arrested over missing lab notebooks

news574-i1.0.jpgThe travails of Judy Mikovits and the Whittemores have all the makings of a soap opera serial. On Friday 18 November, Mikovits, a chronic fatigue syndrome researcher, was arrested and jailed by Ventura County police in relation to a lawsuit brought by her former employer, the Whittemore Peterson Institute (WPI) in Reno, Nevada claiming that she had absconded with lab notebooks and proprietary information. She is being held without bail and may face extradition to Nevada.

As lawyers and patient advocates line up to debate who is right and who is wrong in this bitter dispute, there is still the question of what will become of a US$1.5 million grant from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) that is held by WPI with Mikovits as the principal investigator.

Continue reading

The Scientist shutters after 25 years

scientistcovers260.jpgThe October issue of The Scientist arrived in my mailbox yesterday, and I was happy to see it celebrating its 25th anniversary with a montage of cover images, many of which appeared during my time at the publication (I was an editor there for six years from 2001-2007). Inside, I was excited to see a slew of top-name contributors including George Church, Craig Venter, and Edward O. Wilson – giants in their respective fields fulfilling the mission of an award winning magazine meant to expand horizons for researchers working in the life sciences. And I was touched by the heartfelt editorial by the magazine’s founder, Eugene Garfield, who had shown his faith in the publication by rescuing it from near death on several occasions.

All of which is why I was stunned by the news I received last night that The Scientist has folded. Staffers were brought into an all-hands-on-deck meeting at its offices in New York Thursday morning. There, publisher Jane Hunter and director Andrew Crompton announced that due to economic troubles, there would be no November issue, and no additions to the website save for an announcement of the magazine’s closure some time next week.

Continue reading